Skip to main content
Log in

Availability to peer group treatment in residential care as a function of relational ethics

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty-five adolescent boys from abusive and depriving homes were not doing well in positive peer culture residential care. Despite their backgrounds, given a modified form of the Relational Ethics Scale, they indicated that their relational life with their families of origin was trustworthy, fair, and worthy of continued devotion. In contrast, on the Firo-B these same boys demonstrated distrust of others outside of their families and an unwillingness to get involved. These results support the inference from contextual family theory that peer group interventions cannot bypass identification and resolution of the injustices that took place in the family of origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. M. (1984).Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Krasner, B. R. (1986).Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenthal, P. (1993).Contextual family therapy: Assessment and intervention procedures. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunebaum, J. (1990). From discourse to dialogue: the power of fairness in therapy with couples. In R. Chasin, H. Grunebaum, & M. Herzig, (Eds.),One couple, four realities: Multiple perspectives on couple therapy (pp. 191–228). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunebaum, J. (1988).Contextual therapy, child abuse and feminism. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting, American Association for Marital and Family Therapy. New Orleans.

  • Hargrave, T. D., & Bomba, A. K. (1993). Further validation of the relational ethics scale.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19, 292–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave, T. D., Jennings, G., & Anderson, W. (1991). The development of a relational ethics scale.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, L., Elias, A., & Bixby, F. L. (1958).The highlands story. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L. R. (1989).Clinical interpretation of the FIRO-B (3rd ed.). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, D., & Scharff, J. S. (1987).Object relations family therapy. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. F. (1989).Narcissism and intimacy. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heusden, A. & Van Den Eerenbeemt, E. (1987).Balance in motion: Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy and his vision of individual and family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorrath, H., & Brendtro, C. (1985).Positive peer culture (2nd ed.). Hawthorne, New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This project was fully supported by Teen Ranch, Inc., Marlette, MI 48453.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, R.E. Availability to peer group treatment in residential care as a function of relational ethics. Contemp Fam Ther 17, 343–348 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02252671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02252671

Key words

Navigation