Skip to main content
Log in

Self-efficacy and consumer satisfaction with housing

  • Administrative Update
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During clinical recovery mental health consumers express increasing interest in assuming control over their community living arrangements. Despite recent policy initiatives toward consumer empowerment in housing services and supports, few studies have explored empowerment issues, such as self-efficacy, in relation to housing satisfaction. This study explored the extent to which specific areas of support and self-efficacy predict consumer satisfaction with housing. This study also explored how different types of housing, and consumer housing preferences, also explain consumer satisfaction with housing. One-hundred twenty-five randomly selected consumers completed structured interviews. As hypothesized, hierarchical multiple predictor regression analyses revealed type of housing and self-efficacy as significant predictor variables. The total regression equation accounted for 67 percent of the explained variance in housing satisfaction. Chi-square analyses across housing groups indicated that consumers prefer less restrictive residential settings. Findings suggest that consumers prefer less restrictive housing, as such relate in part to increasing levels of self-efficacy. Further study is recommended to explore how self-efficacy may best be promoted across different clinical groups and different residential settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arns, P.G. & Linney, J.A. (1993). Work, self, and life-satisfaction for persons with severe and persistent mental disorders.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17, 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carling, P.J. (1990). Major mental illness, housing and supports.American Psychologist, 45, 969–975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S.T. (1993). Subjective quality of life in the planning and evaluation of programs.Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L.R. (1993). Brief symptom inventory: administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, J., Spitzer, R.L., Fleiss, J.L. & Cohen, J. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale: a procedure for measuring the overall severity of psychiatric disturbance.Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 776–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, P., Paduchak, D. & Durbin, J. (1990). Housing Homeless Women: a consumer preference study.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 790–794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.M., Dziobek, J.F., Clark, R. & Bassuk, E.L. (1990). Supportive housing for the chronically mentally ill.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 415–422.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B.A. (1978). Strategies for studying client satisfaction.Journal of Social Issues, 34, 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, J. (1990). Responding to consumer housing preferences: the toledo experience.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L.W., Northcott, H.C. & Kinzel, C. (1978). Subjective evaluation of well-being: Problems and prospects.Social Indicators Research, 5, 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1991).Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F. (1983). The well-being of chronic mental patients.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 369–373.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill.Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F. (1991). Quality of life interview: core version, manual.

  • Lehman, A.F., Ward, N.C. & Linn, L.S. (1982). Chronic mental patients: The quality of life issue.American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1271–1276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F., Possidente, S.M. & Hawker, F. (1986). The quality of life of chronic patients in a state hospital and in community residences.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 37, 901–907.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F., & Burns, B.J. (1990). Severe mental illness in the community. In B. Spilker (Ed.)Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. New York: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A.F., Slaughter, J.G. & Myers, C.P. (1991). Quality of life in alternative residential settings.Psychiatric Quarterly, 62, 35–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levstek, D.A. & Bond, G.R. (1993). Housing cost, quality, and satisfaction among formerly homeless persons with serious mental illness in two cities.Innovations and Research, 2, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, O.T. & Wu, L. (1993). Important characteristics of independent housing for people with mental illness: Perspectives of case managers and consumers.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health (1987).Toward a model plan for a comprehensive, community-based mental health system. Washington, D.C.: Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L.I., Lieberman, M., Menaghan, P. & Mullan, J. (1981) The stress process.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkney, A.A., Gerber, G.J. & LaFave, H.G. (1991). Quality of life after psychiatric rehabilitation: the client's perspective.Acta Psychiatric Scandinavia, 83, 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, L. & Parker, R. (1992).Designing and Conducting Survey Research: a Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, J.W. & Zautra, A.J. (1983). Demands and desires in daily life: some influences on well-being.American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway, P. & Zipple, A.M. (1990). The paradigm shift in residential services: from the linear continuum to supported housing approaches.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, S. (1992). Factors contributing to the subjective quality of life of the chronic mentally ill.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 299–315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, S. & Neese-Todd, S. (1993). Elements of a psychosocial clubhouse program associated with a satisfying quality of life.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 76–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzman, B. (1993). An overview of surveys of mental health consumers' preferences for housing and support services.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 450–455.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zautra, A.J. & Reich, J.W. (1983). Life events and perceptions of life quality: developments in a two-factor approach.Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Thomas A. Seilheimer, Ph.D., is affiliated with St. Clair County Community Mental Health Services, Port Huron, Michigan. Guy T. Doyal, Ph.D., is affiliated with Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seilheimer, T.A., Doyal, G.T. Self-efficacy and consumer satisfaction with housing. Community Ment Health J 32, 549–559 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251065

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251065

Keywords

Navigation