Skip to main content
Log in

Across the divide: Religious objections to brain death

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews the evolution of the medical-legal definition of brain death, as well as the normative debate surrounding this reconceptualization. It offers a clinical approach to address religious objections to brain death, which prefers negotiation over confrontation when families and practicitioners must discern the boundaries between life and death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eliade M.The Sacred and the Profane. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. A Definition of Irreversible Coma.JAMA 1968, 205, pp. 337–40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.Defining Death: Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Uniform Determination of Death Act. 12 Uniform Laws Annotated 320 (1990 Supp.).

  5. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law.The Determination of Death. Second edition, 1989.

  6. Ibid. Minority report by Rabbi J. David Bleich.

  7. New York State Department of Health. Determination of Death. Adopted Regulation 10 N.Y.C.R.R. 400.16.

  8. The New Jersey Declaration of Death Act. P.L. 1991, Chapter 90 (To be codified as Chapter 6A of Title 26 of the Revised Statutes.) Section 5: Exemption to Accomodate Personal Religious Beliefs.Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1991, 1(4), pp. 289–292.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eliade M.The Sacred and the Profane. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jonas, H. Against the Stream: Comments on the Definition and Redefinition of Death. In Jonas, H.Philosophical Essays. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974, pp. 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jonas, H. Against the Stream: Comments on the Definition and Redefinition of Death.In Jonas, H.Philosophical Essays. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974,pp. 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosner F. Definition of Death.Modern Medicine and Jewish Ethics: Second revised and Augmented Edition. pp. 263–275. New York: Yeshiva University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fins JJ. Futility in Clinical Practice: Report on a Congress of Clinical Societies.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1994, 42, pp. 861–865.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCullough L and Chevernak F.Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He also serves as physician-ethicist-in-residence at the Hospital Chaplaincy in New York City. An earlier draft of this essay was presented to the Metropolitan New York Ethics Committee Network at the New York Academy of Medicine on 16 November 1994.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fins, J.J. Across the divide: Religious objections to brain death. J Relig Health 34, 33–40 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02248636

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02248636

Keywords

Navigation