Abstract
Rats were trained to discriminate a mixture of amphetamine plus pentobarbitone from either drug separately in a two-bar procedure with food reinforcement. Discrimination was 86% accurate after 48 sessions, and no dose of amphetamine or pentobarbitone alone produced mixture-appropriate responding. Some mixtures increased response rates whereas the same doses of each drug separately had little effect. The same rats were then trained to discriminate a mixture from saline. There was a continuing lack of discriminative response to amphetamine and only a partial response to pentobarbitone, and under these conditions mixtures did not increase overall response rates. Thus, the way rats are trained, and their previous history, can determine the characteristics of the cue obtained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Barrett JE, Olmstead SN (1989) Spiroxatrine as a discriminative stimulus: effects depend on pharmacological history. Drug Dev Res 16:365–374
Barrett JE, Glowa JR, Nader MA (1989) Behavioral and pharmacological history as determinants of tolerance- and sensitization-like phenomena in drug action. In: Goudie AJ, Emmett-Oglesby MW (eds) Psychoactive drugs: tolerance and sensitization. Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey, pp 181–219
Branch MN (1974) Behavior as a stimulus: joint effects ofd-amphetamine and pentobarbital. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 189:33–41
Colpaert FC, Janssen PAJ (1982) OR discrimination: a new drug discrimination method. Eur J Pharmacol 78:141–144
Garcha HS, Stolerman IP (1989) Discrimination of a drug mixture in rats: role of training dose, and specificity. Behav Pharmacol 1:25–31
Hanlin JM, Appel JB (1985) Discrimination of a compound drug stimulus: amphetamine plus LSD versus saline. Soc Neurosci Abstr 11:1193
Koek W, Slangen JL (1982) The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization. Psychopharmacology 76:149–156
Mariathasan EA, Garcha HS, Stolerman IP (1990) Discrimination of an amphetamine-pentobarbitone mixture in rats. Psychopharmacology 101:S 70
Overton DA (1982) Multiple drug training as a method for increasing the specificity of the drug discrimination procedure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 221:166–172
Rushton R, Steinberg H (1963) Mutual potentiation of amphetamine and amylobarbitone measured by activity in rats. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 21:295–305
Rutledge CO, Kelleher RT (1965) Interactions between the effects of methamphetamine and pentobarbital on operant behavior in the pigeon. Psychopharmacologia 7:400–408
Stolerman IP, Rauch RJ, Norris EA (1987) Discriminative stimulus effects of a nicotine-midazolam mixture in rats. Psychopharmacology 93:250–256
Stolerman IP, Mariathasan EA, Garcha HS (1990) Discriminative stimulus effects of drug mixtures in rats. In: NIDA Monograph, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC (in press)
Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Witkin JM, Carter RB, Dykstra LA (1980) Discriminative stimulus properties ofd-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations. Psychopharmacology 68:269–276
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stolerman, I.P., Mariathasan, E.A. Discrimination of an amphetamine-pentobarbitone mixture by rats in an AND-OR paradigm. Psychopharmacology 102, 557–560 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247142
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247142