Skip to main content
Log in

Dissociation between cognitive and motor/motivational deficits in the delayed matching to position test: effects of scopolamine, 8-OH-DPAT and EAA antagonists

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of the muscarinic antagonists scopolamine HBr and MeBr, the 5-HT1A agonst 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), and theN-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists MK-801 and CGS-19755 on performance of rats in a delayed matching-to-position task were examined. Pretreatment with scopolamine HBr (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), resulted in a delay-dependent decrease in the percentage of correct responses and discriminability (logd), but had no effect on either the latency to complete trials, or the rate of trial completion during the fixed duration session. Scopolamine MeBr (0.1 mg/kg) did not impair percent correct or increase the response latency but did decrease the rate of trial completion. 8-OH-DPAT (up to 0.3 mg/kg), had no effect on percent correct, but did induce a small decrease in discriminability. The impairment in discriminability occurred only at a dose that substantially reduced the rate of trial completion. Both MK-801 (0.05 mg/kg) and CGS 19755 (10 mg/kg) induced a delay-independent impairment in percent correct, discriminability and a reduction in the rate of trial completion without affecting latency. A lower dose of CGS 19755 (5.0 mg/kg) induced a slight impairment in discriminability without significantly affecting the other measures. Taken together, these results demonstrate some dissocation between drug-induced cognitive and motor/motivational deficits in the DMTP test. However, the data question the specificity of putative cognitive impairments reported in many previous studies with the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggleton JP, Keith AB, Rawlins JNP, Hunt PR, Sahgal A (1992). Removal of the hippocampus and transection of the fornix produce comparable deficits on delayed non-matching to position by rats. Behav Brain Res 52:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli M, Samanin R (1992) 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin impairs spatial learning in a water maze: role of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. Br J Pharmacol 105:720–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli M, Tranchina S, Samanin R (1992a) 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, impairs performance in a passive avoidance task. Eur J Pharmacol 211:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli M, Lazarova M, Tatarczynska E, Samanin R (1992b) Stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal hippocampus impairs acquisition and performance of a spatial task in a water maze. Brain Res 595:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli M, Tatarczynska E, Cervo L, Samanin R (1993) Stimulation of hippocampal 5-HT1A receptors causes amnesia and anxiolytic-like but not antidepressant-like effects in the rat. Eur J Pharmacology, 234:465–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Clissold DB, Karbon JW, Ferkany JW, Hartman T, Pontecorvo MJ (1992) Effects of strychnine-insensitive glycine receptor antagonists and sigma agents on working memory performance: comparison with dizocilpine and scopolamine. Behav Pharmacol 3:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ, Jones GH, Turner JD (1994) 5-HT1A receptor agonists improve the performance of normal and scopolamine-impaired rats in an operant delayed matching to position task. Psychopharmacology 116:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ, Klewer M, Jones, GH, Stephens DN (1993) Contrasting effects of the competitive NMDA antagonist CPP and the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist MK 801 on performance of an operant delayed matching to position task in rats. Psychopharmacology 111:465–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson GR, Bayley P, Channell S, Iversen SD (1994) A comparison of the effects of the novel muscarinic receptor agonists L-689,660 and AF102B in tests of reference and working memory. Psychopharmacology 113:361–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson GR, Bentley G, Draper F, Rycroft W, Iversen SD, Pagella PG (1991) The behavioural effects of heptyl physostigmine a new cholinesterase inhibitor, in tests of long-term and working memory in rodents. Pharmacol Biochem and Behav 39:865–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson GR, Heyes CM, Iversen SD (1992) Pharmacological mechanisms and animal models of cognition. Behav Pharmacol 3:285–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon RMJ (1991) Pharmacological studies of a rat spatial delayed nonmatch-to-sample task as an animal model of dementia. Drug Dev Res 24:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudchenko P, Sarter M (1992). Behavioral microanalysis of spatial delayed alternation performance: rehearsal through overt behavior, and effects of scopolamine and chlordiazepoxide. Psychopharmacology 107:263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett SB (1985) Comparative effects of cholinergic drugs and lesions of nucleus basalis or fimbria-fornix on delayed matching in rats. Psychopharmacology, 87:357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett SB, Evenden JL, Iversen SD (1988) Delay-dependent short-term memory deficits in aged rats. Psychopharmacology 96:174–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett SB, Wareham AT, Torres EM (1990) Cholinergic blockade in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus disrupts short-term memory in rats. NeuroReport 1:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenden JL (1984) A behavioural and pharmacological analysis of response selection. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cambridge

  • Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1984). Win-stay behaviour in the rat. Q J Exp Psychol 36B:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffan EA Davies J., (1982) Reward, novelty and spontaneous alternation. Q J Exp Psychol 34B:31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutnikov SA, Barnes JC, Rawlins JNP (1994) Working memory tasks in five-choice operant chanbers: Use of relative and absolute spatial memories. Behav Neurosci 108:899–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley JE, Brown G, Stanhope, K, Fletcher, A, Dourish CT (1995) Hyperagia induced by the NMDA receptor antagonists, MK-801 and CGS 19755, in the rat is blocked by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100635. Br J Pharmacol 116:226

    Google Scholar 

  • Herremans AHJ, Hijzen TH, Slangen JL (1994) Validity of a delayed conditional discrimination task as a model for working memory in the rat. Physiol Behav 56:869–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter AJ, Roberts FF (1987) The effects of 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on spatial learning in the Morris water maze task. In: Dourish CT, Ahlenius S, Hutson PH (eds) Brain 5-HT1A receptors: behavioural and neurochemical pharmacology. Ellis Horwood and VCH, Chichester, pp 278–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter WS (1913) The delayed reaction in animals and children. Behav Monogr 2[1]: Serial # 6

  • Kirk RC, White KG, McNaughton N (1988) Low dose scopolamine affects discriminability but not rate of forgetting in delayed conditional discrimination. Psychopharmacology 96:541–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird F, Graham M, Stanhope K, Dourish CT (1995) TheN-methyl-d-asparate (NMDA) receptor antagonists MK-801 and CGS 19755 increase sucrose consumption in thirsty rats. Br J Pharmacol 115:91

    Google Scholar 

  • Laties VG (1972) The modification of drug effects on behaviour by external discriminative stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 183:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Money EA, Kirk RC, McNaughton N (1992) Alzheimers dementia produces a loss of discrimination but no increase in rate of memory decay in delayed matching to sample. Neuropsychologia 30:133–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno M, Yamamoto T, Watanabe S (1993) Working memory deficits induced by intrahippocampal administration of 8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 234:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo MJ (1983) Effect of proactive interference on rats' continuous nonmatching-to-sample performance. Anim Learn Behav 11:356–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo MJ, Clissold, DB, Conti, LH (1988) Age-related cognitive impairments as assessed with an automated repeated measures memory task Implication for the possible role of acetylcholine and norepinephrine in memory dysfunction. Neurobiol Aging 9:617–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo MJ, Clissold DB, White MF, Ferkany JW (1991)N-Methyl-d-aspartate antagonists and working memory performance: comparison with the effects of scopolamine, propranolol, diazepam and phenylisopropyladenosine. Behav Neurosci 105:521–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahgal A (1987) Some limitations of indices derived from signal detection theory: evaluation of an alternative index for measuring bias in memory tasks. Psychopharmacology 91:517–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahgal A, Keith AB and Lloyd S (1990) Opposing effects of vasopressin on matching versus non-matching to position: further evidence for response, not memory, modulation. Psychopharmacolgy 102:130–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger DJ, Jackson A (1989) Effects of phencyclidine and otherN-methyl-d-asparate antagonists on the schedule-controlled behavior of rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 248:1215–1221

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DG, Pontecorvo MJ, Heise GA (1985) Central cholinergic involvement in working memory: effects of scopolamine on continuous nonmatching and discrimination performance in the rat. Behav Neurosci 99:1049–1065

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanhope KJ, Choules M, Yudko E, Dourish CT (1994) Reevaluation of the effects of putative cognitive disrupters in the reinforced-alternation T-maze task in the rat. Br J Pharmacology, 112:15P

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan S, Kirk RC, Abraham WC, McNaughton N (1990) Chlordiazepoxide reduces discriminability but not rate of forgetting in delayed conditional discrimination. Psychopharmacology 101:550–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss J, Rawlins JNP (1991) The competitive NMDA antagonist AP5 but not the non-competitive antagonist MK-801 induced a delay-related impairment in spatial working memory in rats. Exp Brain Res 85:349–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hest A, Stroet J, Van Haaren F, Feenstra M (1990) Scopolamine differentially disrupts the behavior of male and female Wistar rats in a delayed nonmatching to position procedure. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35:903–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton DM, Brown K (1971) Attenuation of stimulus sensitivity induced by scopolamine. Nature 230:126–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton DM, Heise GA (1972) The effects of scopolamine on spatial double alternation in rats. J Comp and Physiol Psychol 81:523–532

    Google Scholar 

  • White KG (1985) Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav 44:15–34

    Google Scholar 

  • White KG, Alsop B (1993) Cognition in birds. In: Sahgal A (ed) behavioural neuroscience a practical approach, volume I. IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter JC, Petti DT (1987) The effects of 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin and other serotonergic agonists on performance in a radial maze: a possible role for 5-HT1A receptors in memory. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:625–628

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanhope, K.J., McLenachan, A.P. & Dourish, C.T. Dissociation between cognitive and motor/motivational deficits in the delayed matching to position test: effects of scopolamine, 8-OH-DPAT and EAA antagonists. Psychopharmacology 122, 268–280 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246548

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246548

Key words

Navigation