Skip to main content
Log in

Standardization of the rat paw formalin test for the evaluation of analgesics

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Administration of 5% formalin into the rat or guinea pig hind paw evokes two spontaneous responses: flinching/shaking and licking/biting of the injected paw. The temporal and behavioral characteristics of these objective endpoints are described. Additionally, several practical suggestions aimed at standardizing this test for the evaluation of analgesics are presented. The early/acute and late/tonic (0–10 and 20–35 min post-formalin, respectively) phases of flinching were used to quantitate antinociception in the rat. PD 117302, the kappa selective agonist, was three times more potent than morphine against tonic flinching after SC administration. Formalin may therefore be a noxious stimulus of choice in the evaluation of kappa agonists. Morphine was only twice as potent against tonic flinching as against acute flinching or the tail-dip reflex to water (50° C). In contrast, PD 117302 was 27 times less potent on early phase and was inactive in the tail-dip test. Thus, while morphine is essentially equipotent across tests, PD 117302 shows a spectrum of activity with impressive potency and efficacy being obtained against tonic pain. Kappa receptors may therefore be prominently involved in tonic pain states. Aspirin given orally was not consistently antinociceptive in either phase of the formalin test. Spinal transection completely abolished late phase responding but only partly attenuated flinching in the early phase. This suggests that the relative involvement of spinal (as opposed to supraspinal) processing of noxious inputs may, at least in part, be a function of stimulus intensity and underlie the differences in antinociceptive potency observed in this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott FV, Melzack R, Samuel C (1982) Morphine analgesia in the tail-flick and formalin tests is mediated by different neural systems. Exp Neurol 75:644–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Allerton CA, Smith JAM, Hunter JC, Hill RG, Hughes J (1989) Correlation of ontogeny with function of [3H]U69593 labelled κ opioid binding sites in the rat spinal cord. Brain Res 502:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Alreja M, Mutalik P, Nayar U, Manchanda SK (1984) The formalin test: a tonic pain model in the primate. Pain 20:97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Attal N, Kayser V, Jazat F, Guilbaud G (1989) Behavioural evidence for a bidirectional effect of systemic naloxone in a model of experimental neuropathy in the rat. Brain Res 494:276–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr GA, Paredes W, Erickson KL, Zukin SR (1986) κ-Opioid receptor mediated analgesia in the developing rat. Dev Brain Res 29:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Besson J-M, Guilbaud G (1988) The arthritic rat as a model of clinical pain? Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvino B, Crepon-Bernard MO, LeBars D (1987) Parallel clinical and behavioural studies of adjuvant-induced arthritis in the rat: possible relationship with “chronic pain”. Behav Brain Res 24:11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesselin F, Montastruc JL, Gros C, Bourgoin S, Hamon M (1980) Met-enkephalin levels and opioid receptors in the spinal cord of chronic suffering rats. Brain Res 191:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CR, Birchmore B, Sharif NA, Hunter JC, Hill RG Hughes J (1988) PD 117302: a selective agonist for the κ-opioid receptor. Br J Pharmacol 93:618–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen SR, Melzack R (1985) Morphine injected into the habenula and dorsal posteromedial thalamus produces analgesia in the formalin test. Brain Res 359:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC (1987) Evidence that adjuvant arthritis in the rat is associated with chronic pain. Pain 28:201–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis SG, Melzack R (1979) Comparison of phasic and tonic pain in animals. Adv Pain Res Ther 3:747–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson AH, Sullivan AF (1987) Subcutaneous formalin-induced activity of dorsal horn neurones in the rat: differential response to an intrathecal opiate administered pre or post formalin. Pain 30:349–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubuisson D, Dennis SG (1977) The formalin test: a quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine, meperidine and brain stem stimulation in rats and cats. Pain 4:161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AG, Sheenan MJ, Tyers MB (1987) Differential sensitivity of models of antinociception in the rat, mouse and guinea pig to μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonists. Br J Pharmacol 91:823–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Headley PM, Parsons CG (1989) μ and κ Opioid “selectivity” between spinal nociceptive reflexes depends on the intensity, not on the modality, of the stimulus. Adv Biosci 75:443–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Höllt V, Haarmann I, Millan MJ, Herz A (1987) Prodynorphin gene expression is enhanced in the spinal cord of chronic arthritic rats. Neurosci Lett 73:90–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunskaar S, Hole K (1987) The formalin test in mice: dissociation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain. Pain 30:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunskaar S, Fasmer OB, Hole K (1985) The formalin test in mice, a useful technique for evaluating mild analgesics. J Neurosci Methods 14:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunskaar S, Berge O-G, Hole K (1986) Dissociation between antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of acetylsalicylic acid and indomethacin in the formalin test. Pain 25:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Iadarola MJ, Brady LS, Draisci G, Dubner R (1988) Enhancement of dynorphin gene expression in spinal cord following experimental inflammation: stimulus specificity, behavioral parameters and opioid receptor binding. Pain 35:313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson HC, Kitchen I (1989) Behavioural effects of selective μ-, κ- and δ-opioid agonists in neonatal rats. Psychopharmacology 97:404–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser V, Guilbaud G (1981) Dose-dependent analgesic and hyperalgesic effect of systemic naloxone in arthritic rats. Brain Res 226:344–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser V, Besson J-M, Guilbaud G (1988) Paradoxical effects of low doses of naloxone in experimental models of inflammatory pain. In: Fields HL, Besson J-M (eds) Pain modulation. Prog Brain Res, vol 77, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 301–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton GE, Johnson MA, Meecham KG, Hill RG, Hughes J (1987) Pharmacological profile of PD 117302, a selective κ-opioid agonist. Br J Pharmacol 92:915–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard MC, Besson J-M (1989) Electrophysiological evidence for a tonic activity of the spinal cord intrinsic opioid system in a chronic pain model. Brain Res 477:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour A, Khachaturian H, Lewis ME, Akil A, Watson SJ (1988) Anatomy of CNS opioid receptors. Trends Neurosci 11:308–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack R (1990) The tragedy of needless pain. Sci Am 262:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Millan MJ (1986) Multiple opioid systems and pain. Pain 27:303–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Millan MJ (1989) Kappa-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception in the rat. I. Comparative actions of mu- and kappa-opioids against noxious thermal, pressure and electrical stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 251:334–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Millan MJ, Członkowski A, Pilcher CWT, Almeida OFX, Millan MH, Colpaert FC, Herz A (1987) A model of chronic pain in the rat: functional correlates of alterations in the activity of opioid systems. J Neurosci 7:77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Millan MJ, Członkowski A, Morris B, Stein C, Arendt R, Huber A, Höllt V, Herz A (1988a) Inflammation of the hind limb as a model of unilateral localized pain: influence on multiple opioid systems in the spinal cord of the rat. Pain 35:299–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Millan MJ, Morris BJ, Herz A (1988b) Antagonist-induced opioid upregulation. I. Characterization of supersensitivity to selective μ- and κ-agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247:721–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray CW, Porreca F, Cowan A (1988) Methodological refinements to the mouse paw formalin test, an animal model of tonic pain. J Pharmacol Methods 20:175–186

    Google Scholar 

  • North MA (1978) Naloxone reversal of morphine analgesia but failure to alter reactivity to pain in the formalin test. Life Sci 22:295–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons CG, Headley PM (1989) Spinal antinociceptive actions of μ-and κ-opioids: the importance of stimulus intensity in determining “selectivity”, between reflexes to different modalities of noxious stimulus. Br J Pharmacol 98:523–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan SM, Watkins LR, Mayer DJ, Maier SF (1985) Spinal pain suppression mechanisms may differ for phasic and tonic pain. Brain Res 334:172–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmauss C (1987) Spinal κ-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception is stimulus specific. Eur J Pharmacol 137:197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmauss C, Yaksh TL (1984) In vivo studies on spinal opiate receptor systems mediating antinociception. II Pharmacological profiles suggesting a differential association of mu, delta and kappa receptors with visceral chemical and cutaneous thermal stimuli in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 228:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmauss C, Yaksh TL, Shimohigashi Y, Harty G, Jensen T, Rodbard D (1983) Differential association of spinal μ, δ and κ-opioid receptors with cutaneous thermal and visceral chemical nociceptive stimuli in the rat. Life Sci 33 [Suppl I]:653–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw JS, Rourke JD, Burns KM (1988) Differential sensitivity of antinociceptive tests to opioid agonists and partial agonists. Br J Pharmacol 95:578–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein C, Millan MJ, Herz A (1988) Unilateral inflammation of the hindpaw in rats as a model of prolonged noxious stimulation: alterations in behavior and nociceptive thresholds. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31:445–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallarida RJ, Murray RB (1987) Manual of pharmacologic calculations with computer programs. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyers MB (1980) A classification of opiate receptors that mediate antinociception in animals. Br J Pharmacol 69:503–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton N, Sewell RDE, Spencer PSJ (1982) Differentiation of potent μ- and κ-opiate agonists using heat and pressure antinociceptive profile and combined potency analysis. Eur J Pharmacol 78:421–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccarino AL, Tasker RAR, Melzack R (1988) Systemic administration of naloxone produces analgesia in BALB/c mice in the formalin pain test. Neurosci Lett 84:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccarino AL, Tasker RAR, Melzack R (1989) Analgesia produced by normal doses of opioid antagonists alone and in combination with morphine. Pain 36:103–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall PD (1984a) Mechanisms of acute and chronic pain. Adv Pain Res Ther 6:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall PD (1984b) Neurophysiology of acute and chronic pain. Adv Pain Res Ther 7:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler H, Porreca F, Cowan A (1988) Further development of the formalin test in rats as a tonic pain model. FASEB J 2:1391

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler-Aceto H, Porreca F, Cowan A (1990) The rat paw formalin test: comparison of noxious agents. Pain 40:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin RS, Eghbali M, Olive D, Unterwald EM, Tempel A (1988) Characterization and visualization of rat and guinea pig brain κ opioid receptors: evidence for κ1 and κ2 opioid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4061–4065

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wheeler-Aceto, H., Cowan, A. Standardization of the rat paw formalin test for the evaluation of analgesics. Psychopharmacology 104, 35–44 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244551

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244551

Key words

Navigation