Skip to main content
Log in

Enlargement of colonic pouch after proctectomy and colonanal anastomosis

Potential cause for evacuation difficulty

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although the functional outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using colonic J-pouch reconstruction is superior to that using conventional straight reconstruction, the one drawback of colonic J-pouch reconstruction is difficulty with evacuation. Recently it has been suggested that construction of a larger colonic J-pouch causes the evacuation difficulty. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the cause of evacuation difficulty with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. METHODS: We compared pouchography of 26 patients with 10-cm colonic J-pouch reconstructions (10-J group) and 27 patients with 5-cm colonic J-pouch reconstructions (5-J group) at three months, one year, and two years after surgery. Functional assessments were performed one year postoperatively. Clinical function was evaluated using a questionnaire. Evacuation function was evaluated by the balloon expulsion and saline evacuation tests. RESULTS: The greatest width of the pouch in the 10-J group in the anteroposterior view was significantly greater than that in the 5-J group at all three measurement times (3 months, 4.9vs. 4 cm;P=0.0011; 1 year, 9vs. 5.6 cm;P<0.0001; 2 years, 9.2vs. 5.8 cm;P<0.0001). The value in the 10-J group at one year after surgery was 1.9 times that at three postoperative months; in the 5-J group this ratio was 1.4. There was a significant difference between these ratios (P<0.0001). No significant difference existed between the values at two years and one year after surgery in either the 10-J or the 5-J group. An evacuation difficulty was significantly more common in the 10-J group than the 5-J group. Evacuation function in the 10-J group was significantly inferior to that in the 5-J group. CONCLUSIONS: The evacuation difficulty observed in patients with larger colonic J-pouch reconstructions is associated with excessive distention of the pouch occurring within one year of surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1986;73:136–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parc P, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowski E, Loygue J. Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986;73:139–41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drake DB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Wolff BG. Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease. Ann Surg 1987;206:600–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ, Donaldson DR. Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision. Br J Surg 1988;75:318–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H,et al. Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991;78:1434–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berger A, Tiret E, Parc R,et al. Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum. World J Surg 1992;16:470–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pélissier EP, Blum D, Bachour A, Bosset JF. Functional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:843–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leo E, Belli F, Baldini MT,et al. New perspective in the treatment of low rectal cancer: total rectal resection and coloendoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37(Suppl):S62–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mortensen NJ, Ramirez JM, Takeuchi N, Smilgin Humphreys MM. Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome. Br J Surg 1995;82:611–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramirez JM, Mortensen NJ, Takeuchi N, Smilgin Humphreys MM. Colonic J-pouch rectal reconstruction: is it really a neorectum? Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1286–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramanos J, Stebbing JF, Smilgin Humphreys MM, Takeuchi N, Mortensen NJ. Ambulatory manometric examination in patients with a colonic J pouch and in normal controls. Br J Surg 1996;83:1744–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Comparison between the colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis and healthy rectum: clinical and physiological function. Br J Surg 1997;84:1437–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K,et al. Functional outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch. Surg Today 1997;27:1109–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 1995;82:608–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz H, De Miguel M, Armendáriz P, Rodriguez J, Chocarro C. Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:375–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hallböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996;224:58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ho YH, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Br J Surg 1996;83:978–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hallböök O, Nyström P-O, Sjödahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:332–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagani RA, Istvan G, Chevreau P. Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1997;84:1449–51.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lazorthes F, Gamagani R, Chiotasso P, Istvan G, Muhammad S. Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1409–13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K,et al. Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch: prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:986–91.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T,et al. Indications for colonic J-pouch reconstruction after anterior resection for rectal cancer: determining the optimum level of anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:558–63.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (International Union Against Cancer), eds. TNM Classification of malignant tumours. 5th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1997:66–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lindquist K, Liljeqvist, Sellberg B. The topography of ileoanal reservoirs in relation to evacuation patterns and clinical functions. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:573–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pescatori M, Manhire A, Bartram CI. Evacuation pouchography in the evaluation of ileoanal reservoir function. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:365–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tsao JI, Galandiuk S, Pemberton JH. Pouchogram: predictor of clinical outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:547–51.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thoeni RF, Fell SC, Engelstad B, Schrock TB. Ileoanal pouches: comparison of CT, scintigraphy, and contrast enemas for diagnosing post surgical complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stelzner M, Fonkalsrud EW, Lichtenstein G. Significance of reservoir length in the endorectal ileal pullthrough with ileal reservoir. Arch Surg 1988;123:1265–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hennild V, Kjærgård H, Hansen LK. Radiologic evaluation of the continent (S-pouch) ileal reservoir with anal anastomosis. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 1986;27:301–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hillard AE, Mann FA, Becker JM, Nelson JA. The ileoanal J pouch: radiographic evaluation. Radiology 1985;155:591–4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kremers PW, Scholz FJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA. Radiology of the ileoanal reservoir. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145:559–67.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Becker JM, Hillard AE, Mann FA, Kestenberg A, Nelson JA. Functional assessment after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull-through. World J Surg 1985;9:598–605.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Becker JM. Anal sphincter function after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull-through. Arch Surg 1984;119:526–31.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr, Wolff BG. Ileal. “J” pouch-anal anastomosis: clinical outcome. Ann Surg 1985;202:735–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Becker JM, Raymond JL. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1986;204:375–83.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Öresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Åkervall S, Hultén L. Pouch size: the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1990;77:265–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chaussade S, Michopoulos S, Hautefeuille M,et al. Clinical and physiological study of anal sphincter and ileal J pouch before preileostomy closure and 6 and 12 months after closure of loop ileostomy. Dig Dis Sci 1991;36:161–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, and a grant for Cancer Research from the Osaka Cancer Foundation.

About this article

Cite this article

Hida, Ji., Yasutomi, M., Maruyama, T. et al. Enlargement of colonic pouch after proctectomy and colonanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 1181–1188 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238571

Key words

Navigation