Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of previous surgery on time taken for incision and division of adhesions during laparotomy

  • Presidential Address
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adhesions from previous surgery constitute a major problem in general surgery. Much is known of the consequences of adhesions in terms of morbidity, but there has been little documentation of the effect of previous surgery on the time taken to reoperate. METHODS: Information on incision time and division of adhesion time was recorded on 120 patients (89 elective cases and 31 emergencies) undergoing midline laparotomy under the care of a single colorectal surgeon. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of elective and 71 percent of emergency cases had previously had abdominal surgery. Previous surgery prolonged the median incision time from 5 (range, 3–10) to 8 (range, 4–39) minutes (P<0.001) and the median division of adhesion time from 0 (range, 0–30) to 15 (range, 0–12) minutes (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Previous surgery significantly increases the operating time during subsequent surgery by a median of 18 minutes. This information may be of use in the planning of surgical workload and highlights the needs for cost-effective adhesion prevention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson JN, Whawell SA. Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation. Br J Surg 1995;82:3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW,et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deutsch AA, Eviatar E, Gutman H, Reiss R. Small bowel obstruction: a review of 264 cases and suggestions for management. Postgrad med J 1989;65:463–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN,et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:1476–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beck DE, Opelka FG, Bailey HR, Rauh SM, Pashos CL. Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:241–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions—how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg 1990;72:60–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scott-Coombes DM, Vipond MN, Thompson JN. General surgeons' attitudes to the treatment and prevention of abdominal adhesions (current practice). Ann R Coll Surg 1993;75:123–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DiZerega GS. The peritoneum: postsurgical repair and adhesion formation. In: Rock JA, Murphy AA, Jones HW, eds. Female reproductive surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1992:2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis H. The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;577:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, M.G., McLain, A.D. & Moran, B.J. Impact of previous surgery on time taken for incision and division of adhesions during laparotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 1297–1299 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237441

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237441

Key words

Navigation