Skip to main content
Log in

Does laparoscopicvs. Conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Traumatic manipulation of cancer specimens during laparoscopic colectomy may increase exfoliation of malignant cells into the peritoneal cavity, causing an early occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-sites recurrence. Because of this concern, the routine use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer was suggested recently. We assessed if laparoscopicvs. conventional surgery increases exfoliated malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized fashion, 38 colorectal cancer patients undergoing an elective, curative operation were assigned to either a conventional or laparoscopic procedure between June 1996 and May 1997. In either group (n=19), after the abdominal cavity was entered, saline was instilled into the peritoneal cavity, and the fluid was collected (Specimen 1). During surgery, all irrigating fluids were collected (Specimen 2). Both specimens were assessed for malignancy using four techniques: filtration process (ThinPrep®), smear, cell block, and immunochemistry using Ber-EP4. The change in the amount of tumor cells in both specimens was compared between surgical groups. A pilot study was performed to validate the proposed cytologic method. RESULTS: In the pilot study of 20 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer, postresectional peritoneal cytology was positive in six patients, including two Stage II (T3,N0,M0) patients. The pilot study also validated that our semiquantitative scoring system can be reliably used to assess the amount of free peritoneal cancer cells. In the main study, 16 right colectomies, 3 extended right colectomies, 17 proctosigmoidectomies, and 1 left colectomy were performed. The T and N stages were T1 (n=13), T2 (n=5), T3 (n=8), T4 (n=11); N0 (n=22), N1 (n=8), N2 (n=7). Malignant cells were not detected in any Specimens 1 or, more importantly, in Specimens 2 in either surgical group. CONCLUSION: When performed according to strict oncologic surgical principles, laparoscopic techniques in curative colorectal cancer surgery did not have an increased risk of intraperitoneal cancer cell spillage, compared with conventional techniques. We hope that these results can decrease some of the concerns about tumors cell spillage and seeding during laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wong LS, Morris AG, Fraser IA. The exfoliation of free malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 1996;5:115–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leather AJ, Kocjan G, Savage F,et al. Detection of free malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity before and after resection of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:814–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ambrose NS, MacDonald F, Young J, Thompson H, Keighley MR. Monoclonal antibody and cytological detection of free malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer—can monoclonal antibodies do better? Eur J Surg Oncol 1989;15:99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fusco MA, Paluzzi MW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:858–61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nduka CC, Monson JR, Menzies-Gow N, Darzi A. Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy [review]. Br J Surg 1994;81:648–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy [letter]. Lancet 1994;344:58.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic management of cancer patients [review]. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1995;40:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Wound recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer—new rationale for intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy [Editorial]. Surg Endosc 1996;10:295–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacquet P, Averbach AM, Stephens AD, Sugarbaker PH. Cancer recurrence following laparoscopic colectomy: report of two patients treated with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1110–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Latza U, Niedobitek G, Schwarting R, Nekarda H, Stein H. Ber-EP4: new monoclonal antibody which distinguishes epithelia from mesothelia. J Clin Pathol 1990;43:213–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO, Williamson RC. Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg 1984;71:659–63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abulafi AM, Williams NS. Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 1994;81:7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keighley MR, Hall C. Anastomotic recurrence of colorectal cancer—a biological phenomenon or an avoidable catastrophe? Gut 1987;28:786–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore GE, Sako K, Kondo T, Badillo J, Burke E. Assessment of the exfoliation of tumor cells into the body cavities. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1961;112:469–74.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Urdaneta LF, Hoyne RF, Loh PM, Fidler SR, McGrady D. A search for malignant cells in peritoneal fluid from patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 1983;49:76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martin JK Jr, Goellner JR. Abdominal fluid cytology in patients with gastrointestinal malignant lesions. Mayo Clin Proc 1986;61:467–71.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy PD, Wadhera V, Griffin SM,et al. Free peritoneal tumor cell identification in patients with gastric and colorectal cancer. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1993;38:28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sheibani K, Shin SS, Kezirian J, Weiss LM. Ber-EP4 antibody as a discriminant in the differential diagnosis of malignant mesotheliomaversus adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15:779–84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fischler DF, Toddy SM. Nongynecologic cytology utilizing the ThinPrep processor. Acta Cytol 1996;40:669–75.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hees K, Lebeau PB. Comparison of conventional and ThinPrep preparations of mucoid cytology samples. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;12:181–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bur M, Knowles K, Pekow P, Corral O, Donovan J. Comparison of ThinPrep preparation with conventional cervicovaginal smears—practical considerations. Acta Cytol 1995;39:631–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenberg IL, Russell CW, Giles GR. Cell viability studies on the exfoliated colonic cancer cell. Br J Surg 1978;65:188–90.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fermor B, Umpleby HC, Lever JV, Symes MO, Williamson RC. Proliferative and metastatic potential of exfoliated colorectal cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1986;76:347–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skipper D, Cooper AJ, Marston JE, Taylor I. Exfoliated cells andin vitro growth in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1987;74:1049–52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hanley JA, Lippmann-Hard A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA 1983;249:1743–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 22 to 26, 1997.

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S.H., Milsom, J.W., Gramlich, T.L. et al. Does laparoscopicvs. Conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer?. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 971–977 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237382

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237382

Key words

Navigation