Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modification of the gluteal perforator-based flap for reconstruction of the posterior vagina

  • Technical Notes
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Vaginal reconstruction after pelvic exenteration not only affords significant psychological benefit, it also decreases the morbidity and mortality associated with pelvic exenteration. In irradiated patients filling the surgical defect with healthy, well-vascularized tissue, such as omental flaps, colonic advancements, and myocutaneous flaps, has been shown to decrease the incidence of fistulas, bowel obstructions, infections, and hemorrhage. A novel use of the gluteal perforator-based flap is described in the unique circumstance of posterior pelvic exenteration with sacrectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kroll SS, Rosenfield L. Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:561–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta S, Ikeda A. The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:678–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Masakazu A, Okiharu M, Yuuzaburou N, Asagoe K. Perforator-based flap for coverage of lumbosacral defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:987–91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martello JY, Vasconez HC. Vulvar and vaginal reconstruction after surgical treatment for gynecologic cancer. Clin Plast Surg 1995;22:129–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kusiak JF, Rosenblum NG. Neovaginal reconstruction after exenteration using an omental flap and splitthickness skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97:775–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cocke WM, Bolasny BL, Sawyers JL. Vaginal reconstruction following extended abdominoperineal resection. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970;46:372–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Soper JT, Berchuck A, Creasman WT, Clarke-Pearson DL. Pelvic exenteration: factors associated with major surgical morbidity. Gynecol Oncol 1989;35:93–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE. Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;58:176–83.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Soper JT, Rodriguez G, Berchuck A, Clarke-Pearson DL. Long and short gracilis myocutaneous flaps for vulvovaginal reconstruction after radical pelvic surgery: comparison of flap-specific complications. Gynecol Oncol 1995;56:271–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tobin GR, Day TG. Vaginal and pelvic reconstruction with distally based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith HO, Genesen MC, Runowicz CD, Goldberg GL. The rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Cancer 1998;83:510–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Judge, B.A., García-Aguilar, J. & Landis, G.H. Modification of the gluteal perforator-based flap for reconstruction of the posterior vagina. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 1020–1022 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237372

Key words

Navigation