Skip to main content
Log in

New, simple approach for maximal pudendal nerve exposure

Anomalies and prospects for functional reconstruction

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional neosphincters after pudendal nerve anastomosis proved possible in animal models and may be applicable in humans, but access is a recognized problem. We report the occurrence of pudendal nerve anomalies, its implications for reconstruction, and describe a new approach for maximal exposure. METHODS: Adult human cadavers were positioned prone and dissectedvia a gluteal approach. Pudendal nerve variations and physical measurements were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: A new, simple, four-step approach (surface landmarks and exposure of gluteus maximus muscle, sacrotuberous ligament, and pudendal neurovascular bundle) permitted optimal pudendal nerve exposure in all 14 human cadavers (28 limbs). Six were males and had a mean age of 82 (range, 58–102) years. Two anomalies, Type 1 (2-trunked) and Type 2 (3-trunked), of the pudendal nerve were recognized in 30 percent of cadavers, with a left-to-right ratio of 2.5:1. Mean pudendal nerve length over the ischial spine was 23.9 (range, 19–28) mm right, 24.2 (range, 19–28) mm left (P=0.54), but its diameter measured 5.2 mm (right) and 4.9 mm (left;P=0.04). Mean length of pudendal nerve trunk exposed after reflection of the sacrotuberous ligament was 55 (range, 44–75) mm on either side before division into terminal branches. The number and percent frequency of inferior rectal nerve on both sides were 1 (13 percent), 2 (76 percent), and 3 (11 percent), respectively, with a mean length of 27.1 (range, 21–34) mm right and 27.9 (range, 20–33) mm left (P=0.31). CONCLUSION: A simple four-step approach to the pudendal nerve contributes to improved access in all cases. It facilitates reconstruction because it allows accurate nerve selection and recognition of potential anomalies that might influence functional outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidt E. The continent colostomy. World J Surg 1982;6:805–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg 1952;135:853–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruining HA, Bos KE, Colthoff EG, Tolhurst DE. Creation of an anal sphincter mechanism by bilateral proximally based gluteal muscle transposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67:70–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abercrombie JE, Williams NS. Total anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg 1995;82:438–42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991;338:1166–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans S,et al. Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1991;338:1163–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sato T, Konish F. Functional perineal colostomy with pudendal nerve anastomosis following anorectal resection: an experimental study. Surgery 1996;119:641–51.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Congilosi SM, Johnson DR, Medot M,et al. Experimental model of pudendal nerve innervation of a skeletal muscle neosphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1997;84:1269–73.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sato T, Konishi F, Kanazawa K. Anal sphincter reconstruction with a pudendal nerve anastomosis following abdominoperineal resection: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1497–503.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shafik A. Endoscopic pudendal canal decompression for the treatment of faecal incontinence due to pudendal canal syndrome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 1997;7:227–34.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shafik A, el-Sherif M, Youssef A, Olfat ES. Surgical anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its clinical implications. Clin Anat 1995;8:110–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sikorski A, Olszewski J, Miekos E. Anatomical considerations of selective pudendal neurectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 1987;19:159–63.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sato T, Konishi F, Kanazawa K. Functional perineal colostomy with pudendal nerve anastomosis following anorectal resection: a cadaver operation study on a new procedure. Surgery 1997;121:569–74.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vrahas M, Hern TC, Diangelo D,et al. Ligamentous contributions to pelvic stability. Orthopedics 1995;18:271–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vukicevic S, Marusic A, Stavljenic A,et al. Holographic analysis of the human pelvis. Spine 1991;16:209–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mr. O'Bichere is supported by a grant from St. Mark's Hospital/Northwick Park Institute for Medical Research and Dansac Limited. Presented at the “Short Article Meeting” Section of Coloproctology, Royal Society of Medicine, London, United Kingdom, November 25, 1998.

About this article

Cite this article

O'Bichere, A., Green, C. & Phillips, R.K.S. New, simple approach for maximal pudendal nerve exposure. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 956–960 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237358

Key words

Navigation