Skip to main content
Log in

Extrafascial excision of the rectum

Surgical anatomy of the fascia propria

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is now agreed that it is of vital importance to maintain the fascia propria as an intact envelope around the mesorectum to prevent tumor spillage while performing rectal excision for cancer. There are several surgical techniques described to achieve an intact fascial envelope, each arising from differing descriptions of the fascia propria of the rectum. The aim of this study was to describe the detailed surgical anatomy of the fascia propria. METHODS: Thirteen rectal specimens surgically removed by the technique of extrafascial excision were subjected to gross inspection, dissection, and histologic and electron microscopic examination. The attachments, thickness, and composition of the fascia propria were determined. RESULTS: The fascia propria is a continuous fascial sleeve surrounding the rectum and mesorectum that can be dissected as a complete “sock” off a fresh extrafascial specimen. It is 154 (±1 standard deviation = 61–391) µm thick, is thinner anteriorly than posteriorly (P<0.05), and is composed predominantly of collagen. It can be identified surgically at the pelvic brim as a shiny membrane and lies inside the hypogastric nerves and the pelvic plexuses. CONCLUSION: The fascia propria forms a sleeve around the mesorectum, offering a surface against which to dissect, enabling safe removal of the rectum with its intact mesorectum while preserving the autonomic nerves of the pelvis. The term “extrafascial excision” highlights the importance of the fascia propria in this operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Church JM, Raudkivi PJ, Hill GL. The surgical anatomy of the rectum—a review with particular relevance to the hazards of rectal mobilisation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:158–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beart RW. Mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: the new standard? Adv Surg 1999;32:193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Takahashi T, Ueno M, Azekura K, Ota H. The lymphatic spread of rectal cancer and the effect of dissection: Japanese contribution and experience. In: Soreide O, Norstein J, eds. Rectal cancer surgery: optimisation—standardisation—documentation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997:165–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Havenga K, DeRuiter MC, Enker WE, Welvaart K. Antomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:384–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hill GL, Rafique M. Extrafascial excision of the rectum for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:809–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Havenga K, Enker WE, DeRuiter MC, Welvaart K. Anatomical basis of total mesorectal excision and preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves in the treatment of rectal cancer. In: Soreide O, Norstein J, eds. Rectal cancer surgery: optimisation—standardisation—documentation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997:134–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Enker WE. Potency, cure, and local control in the operative treatment of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 1992;127:1396–401.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rutegard J, Sandzen B, Stenling R, Wiig J, Heald RJ. Lateral rectal ligaments contain important nerves. Br J Surg 1997;84:1544–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crapp AR, Cuthbertson AM. William Waldeyer and the rectosacral fascia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;138:252–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Ophoven A, Roth S. The anatomy and embryological origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers: a medicohistorical debate. J Urol 1997;157:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tobin CE BJ. Anatomical, and surgical restudy of Denonvilliers' fascia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1948;80:373–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36:976–83.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cunéo B, Veau V. De la signification morphologique des aponévroses périvésicales. J Anat Physiol 1899;35:235. Cited by: van Ophoven A, Roth S. The anatomy and embryological origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers: a medico-historical debate. J Urol 1997;157:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Funded by a research grant from The Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust.

About this article

Cite this article

Bissett, I.P., Chau, K.Y. & Hill, G.L. Extrafascial excision of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 903–910 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237349

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237349

Key words

Navigation