Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective, blinded comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonographyvs. contrast-enhanced computerized tomography for liver assessment in patients undergoing colorectal carcinoma surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively and blindly compare intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography to preoperative contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in detecting liver lesions in colorectal cancer patients. Additionally, we compared conventional (open) intraoperative ultrasonography with bimanual liver palpation to contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in a subset of patients. METHODS: From December 1995 to March 1998, 77 consecutive patients underwent curative (n=63) or palliative (n=14) resections for colorectal cancer. All patients undergoing curative resections were randomized to either laparoscopic (n=34) or conventional (n=29) surgery after informed consent. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computerized tomography, diagnostic laparoscopy, and laparoscopic ultrasonography before resection. In those patients who had conventional procedures, intraoperative ultrasonography with bimanual liver palpation was also done. All laparoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative ultrasonography evaluations were performed by one of two radiologists who were blinded to the CT results. All hepatic segments were scanned using a standardized method. The yield of each modality was calculated using the number of lesions identified by each imaging modality divided by the total number of lesions identified. RESULTS: In 43 of the 77 patients, both the laparoscopic ultrasonography and CT scan were negative for any liver lesions. In 34 patients, a total of 130 lesions were detected by laparoscopic ultrasonography, CT, or both. When compared with laparoscopic ultrasonography, intraoperative ultrasonography with bimanual liver palpation identified one additional metastatic lesion and no additional benign lesions. laparoscopic ultrasonography identified two patients with mets who had negative preoperative contrast-enhanced computerized tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ultrasonography of the liver at the time of primary resection of colorectal cancer yields more lesions than preoperative contrast-enhanced computerized tomography and should be considered for routine use during laparoscopic oncologic colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charnley RM, Morris DL, Dennison AR, Amar SS, Hardcastle JD. Detection of colorectal liver metastases using intraoperative ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1991;78:45–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen AK. Intraoperative ultrasonography and the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1990;77:998–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke MP, Kane RA, Steele G Jr,et al. Prospective comparison of preoperative imaging and intraoperative ultrasonography in the detection of liver tumors. Surgery 1989;106:849–55.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Machi J, Isomoto H, Yamashita Y, Kurohiji T, Shirouzu K, Kakegawa T. Intraoperative ultrasonography in screening for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: comparative accuracy with traditional procedures. Surgery 1987;101:678–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paul MA, Mulder LS, Cuesta MA, Sikkenk AC, Lyesen GK, Meijer S. Impact of intraoperative ultrasonography on treatment strategy for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1994;81:1660–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rafaelson SR, Kronborg O, Larsen C, Fenger C. Intraoperative ultrasonography in detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:355–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Soyer P, Levesque M, Elias D, Zeitoun G, Roche A. Detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: comparison of intraoperative US and CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1992;183:541–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart PJ, Chu JM, Kos SC, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Intra-operative ultrasound for the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 1993;63:530–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marchesa P, Milsom JW, Hale JC, O'Malley CM, Fazio VW. Intraoperative laparoscopic liver ultrasonography for staging of colorectal cancer: initial experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(Suppl):S73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freedman LS. Evaluating and comparing imaging techniques: a review and classification of study designs. Br J Radiol 1987;60:1071–81.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lossing AG, Hatswell EM, Wright JG, Hu Z, MacLeod R. Diagnostic test studies: biotechnology assessment. Surgery 1996;120:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wald N, Cuckle H. Reporting the assessment of screening and diagnostic tests. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:389–96.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1994;271:389–91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. John TG, Greig JD, Crosbie JL, Miles WF, Garden OJ. Superior staging of liver tumors with laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound. Ann Surg 1994;220:711–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feld RI, Liu J, Nazarian L,et al. Laparoscopic liver sonography: preliminary experience in liver metastases compared with CT portography. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:288–95.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barbot DJ, Marks JH, Feld RI, Liu JB, Rosato FE. Improved staging of liver tumors using laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound. J Surg Oncol 1997;64:63–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Callery MP, Strasberg SM, Doherty GM, Soper NJ, Norton JA. Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography: optimizing resectability in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:33–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas, May 2 to 7, 1998.

About this article

Cite this article

Milsom, J.W., Jerby, B.L., Kessler, H. et al. Prospective, blinded comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonographyvs. contrast-enhanced computerized tomography for liver assessment in patients undergoing colorectal carcinoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 44–49 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237242

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237242

Key words

Navigation