Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A pilot study of total pelvic floor repair or gluteus maximus transposition for postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report pilot data comparing the morbidity and functional outcome of total pelvic floor repair with gluteus maximus transposition for women with postobstetric fecal incontinence. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized trial of two surgical procedures in 24 women so far. Functional assessment was performed with use of a 20-point clinical incontinence score and patient questionnaire before and after operation. The physiologic parameters, before and after operation, included resting and squeeze anal pressures, length of the high pressure zone, anal and rectal mucosal sensitivity, and pudendal nerve latency. RESULTS: So far, 12 patients have been treated by total pelvic floor repair and 12 by gluteus maximus transposition. Of these, three patients developed wound complications after gluteus maximus transposition compared with none after total pelvic floor repair. Among these cases there was a significant overall improvement in functional score (given as mean ± standard deviation) after both total pelvic floor repair (13.1±2.7vs. 6.6±4.5;P<0.001) and gluteus maximus transposition (13.8±3.8vs. 7.7±6.1;P<0.01), although no difference existed between the groups. There was no change in any of the physiologic measurements after either operation, and preoperative measurements did not identify patients likely to do badly. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude from these preliminary data that both total pelvic floor repair and gluteus maximus transposition significantly improve continence in women with postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence. Gluteus maximus transposition gives equivalent results to total pelvic floor repair. Neither procedure has any influence on anorectal physiologic parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engel AF, Kamm MA. The acute effect of straining on pelvic floor neurological function. Int J Colorect Dis 1994;9:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deen KI, Oya M, Ortiz J, Keighley MR. Randomized trial comparing three forms of pelvic floor repair for neuropathic fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1993;80:794–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Korsgen S, Deen KI, Keighley MR. Long-term results of total pelvic floor repair for postobstetric fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:835–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Devesa JM, Vicente E, Enriquez JM,et al. Total fecal incontinence—a new method of gluteus maximus transposition: preliminary results and report of previous experience with similar procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:339–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliveira L, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 1996;83:502–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Andromanakos N, Deen KI, Grant EA, Keighley MR. Anorectal physiology in the assessment and management of patients with fecal incontinence. Hellenic J of Gastroenterology 1996;9:151–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MR. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut 1993;34:685–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farthing MJ, Lennard-Jones JE. Sensibility of the rectum to distension and the anorectal distension reflex in ulcerative colitis. Gut 1978;19:64–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keighley MR and Williams NS. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. London: WB Saunders, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parks AG. Anorectal incontinence. J Roy Soc Med 1973;68:681–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Locke-Edmunds JC, Mortensen NJ. Prospective study of conservative and operative treatment for fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1988;75:101–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Womack NR, Morrison JF, Williams NS. Prospective study of the effects of post-anal repair in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1988;75:48–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MR. Physiological changes after post-anal repair and parameters predicting outcome. Br J Surg 1988;75:1220–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinho M, Ortiz J, Oya M,et al. Total pelvic floor repair for the treatment of neuropathic fecal incontinence. Am J Surg 1992;163:340–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Critical assessment of the quality of continence after post-anal repair for fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1989;76:1054–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Setti Carro P, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ. Long-term results of post-anal repair for neurogenic fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1994;81:140–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt D. Late results following smooth muscle sphincter replacement. Chirurg 1985;56:305–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Corman ML. Gracilis muscle transposition for anal incontinence: late results. Br J Surg 1985;72(Suppl):S21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Clinical and manometric assessment of gracilis muscle transplant for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:767–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FE, Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg 1952;135:853–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Konsten J, Baeten CG, Spaans F, Havenith MG, Soeters PB. Follow up of anal dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. World J Surg 1993;17:404–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM,et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. New Engl J Med 1995;332:1600–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Korsgen S, Keighley MR. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter—not as good as previously thought: report of four cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1331–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the University Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    K. Yoshioka M.D., O. A. Ogunbiyi M.D. (F.R.C.S.) & M. R. B. Keighley M.S.

Authors
  1. K. Yoshioka M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. A. Ogunbiyi M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. R. B. Keighley M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshioka, K., Ogunbiyi, O.A. & Keighley, M.R.B. A pilot study of total pelvic floor repair or gluteus maximus transposition for postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 252–257 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237137

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237137

Key words

Search

Navigation