Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation and outcome of the delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the results of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of patients with rectal outlet obstruction. METHODS: A descriptive retrospective study from October 1989 to October 1997 was undertaken. Thirty-four patients with an abnormal defecography documenting rectal outlet obstruction caused by internal rectal prolapse or a combination of internal rectal prolapse and rectocele were included in the study. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (33 females) ages 35 to 82 (mean, 61.4) years were followed up for the duration of the study (mean follow-up, 43 months). Twenty-six patients (76.4 percent) reported a good to excellent overall result after the Delorme procedure. Eight patients (23.6 percent) reported fair to poor results. Symptomatic improvement was observed in 89.7 percent for patients who had incomplete evacuation, and in 88.5 percent of patients who had constipation. There was improvement in 78.6 percent of patients with bleedingper rectum, in 92.9 percent of patients with straining, and in 82.4 percent of patients with the need to manually assist in defecation by pushing in the perineum or vagina. Discontinuation of laxative use after the procedure was reported by 66.7 percent of patients. Improvement in the patients with some degree of incontinence was seen in 33.3 percent. Twelve patients (35.3 percent) experienced one or more complications. The procedure was performed in an outpatient setting in 71 percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Delorme procedure for the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction can be done with minimal morbidity, short hospital stay often in an outpatient setting, with good functional results, and with an overall patient satisfaction above 75 percent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berman IR, Manning DH, Dudley-Wright K. Anatomic specificity in the diagnosis and treatment of internal rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:816–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ihre T. Internal procidentia of the rectum: treatment and results. Scand J Gastroenterol 1972;7:643–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berman IR, Harris MS, Rabeler MB. Delorme's transrectal excision for internal rectal prolapse: patient selection, technique, and three-year follow up. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:573–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lowry AC, Goldberg SM. Internal and overt rectal procidentia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1987;16:47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asman HB. Internal procidentia of the rectum. South Med J 1957;50:641–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman MJ, Kodner IJ, Fry RD. Internal intussusception of the rectum: diagnosis and surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:435–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ihre T, Seligson U. Intussusception of the rectum—internal procidentia: treatment and results in 90 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:391–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oliver GC, Vachon D, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP. Delorme's procedure for complete rectal prolapse in severely debilitated patients. An analysis of 41 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:461–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tobin SA, Scott IH. Delorme operation for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:1681–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Edmond Delorme 1847–1929. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:544–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plusa SM, Charig JA, Balaji V, Watts A, Thompson MR. Physiologic changes after Delorme's procedure for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1995;82:1475–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lechaux JP, Lechaux D. Perez M. Rsults of Delorme's Procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of a modified technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:301–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christiansen J, Kirkegaard P. Delorme's operation for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:537–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uhlig BE, Sullivan ES. The modified Delorme operation: its place in surgical treatment for massive rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:513–21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gundersen AL, Cogbill TH, Landercasper J. Reappraisal of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:721–4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nay HR, Blair CR. Perineal surgical repair of rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1972;123:577–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Swinton NW, Palmer TE. The management of rectal prolapse and procidentia. Am J Surg 1960;99:144–51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berman IR. Different strokes for different folks in repair of rectal prolapse [letter]. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:330–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Liberman, H., Hughes, C. & Dippolito, A. Evaluation and outcome of the delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 188–192 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236980

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236980

Key words

Navigation