Skip to main content
Log in

Stoma complications

The Cook County Hospital experience

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: A retrospective analysis of enteric stomas performed at Cook County Hospital was undertaken to evaluate stoma complications per stoma type and configuration and operating service. In addition, we attempted to identify factors predictive of increased enteric stoma complications. METHODS: From 1976 to 1995, data cards on 1,616 patients with stomas were compiled by Cook County Hospital enteric stomal therapists. Data card information included age, gender, weight, early and late stoma complications, emergency status, operating service, type and configuration of the stoma, and whether the patient was seen preoperatively by an enteric stomal therapist. Data were then analyzed using a logistic regression model to identify those variables that influenced the rate of complications. RESULTS: There were 553 (34 percent) patients with complications. Among the total complications, 448 (28 percent) occurred early (<1 month postoperative), and 105 (6 percent) occurred late (>1 month). The most common early complications were skin irritation (12 percent), pain associated with poor stoma location (7 percent), and partial necrosis (5 percent). The most common late complications were skin irritation (6 percent), prolapse (2 percent), and stenosis (2 percent). The enteric stoma with the most complications was the loop ileostomy (75 percent). The enteric stoma with the least complications was the end transverse colostomy (6 percent). The general surgery service had the most complications (47 percent), followed by gynecology (44 percent), surgical oncology (37 percent), colorectal (32 percent), pediatric surgery (29 percent), and trauma (25 percent). Age, operating service, enteric stoma type and configuration, and preoperative enteric stomal therapist marking were found to be variables that influenced stoma complications. CONCLUSIONS: Complications from enteric stoma construction are common. Preoperative enteric stoma site marking, especially in older patients, and avoiding the ileostomy, particularly in the loop configuration, can help minimize complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagi P, Jendresen M, Kirkegaard P. Early local stoma complications in relation to the applied suture material: comparison between monofilament and multifilament sutures. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:739–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doherty C. The climate for surgical treatment of obesity in the United States. Probl Gen Surg 1992;9:227–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pearl RK. Complications of ileostomy. In: Nelson RL, Nyhus LM, eds. Surgery of the small intestine. Norwalk, CA: Appleton and Lange, 1987:449–509.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pearl RK, Tan AB. Stomas and stoma care. In: Nyhus LM, Baker RJ, eds. Mastery of surgery. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co, 1992:1218–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pearl RK, Prasad LM, Orsay CP, Abcarian H, Tan AB, Melzl MT. Early local complications from intestinal stomas. Arch Surg 1985;120:1145–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:916–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abrams AV, Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC. Ileostomy in the elderly. Dis Colon Rectum. 1975;18:115–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Park, J.J., Pino, A.D., Orsay, C.P. et al. Stoma complications. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 1575–1580 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236210

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236210

Key words

Navigation