Skip to main content
Log in

Horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis of the colonic J-pouch

Defining causes of evacuation difficulty

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is improved by the construction of a colonic J-pouch. One disadvantage of this type of reconstruction is evacuation difficulty, which has been associated with large pouches. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the causes of evacuation difficulty in large pouches using pouchography. METHODS: The angle between the longitudinal axis of the pouch and the horizontal line (pouch-horizontal angle) on lateral pouchography was determined in 26 patients with 10-cm J-pouch reconstructions (10-J group) and 27 patients with 5-cm J-pouch reconstructions (5-J group). Measurement were made at three months, one year, and two years after surgery. Clinical function was evaluated using a questionnaire one year postoperatively. RESULTS: The pouch-horizontal angle in the 10-J group was significantly smaller than that in the 5-J group at all three time points. In both groups the pouch-horizontal angle at one year was significantly smaller than that at three months. There were no significant differences between the pouch-horizontal angles at one and two years. An evacuation difficulty was significantly more common in the 10-J group than the 5-J group. CONCLUSIONS: The evacuation difficulty observed in patients with large colonic J-pouch reconstructions may be attributed to the development of a horizontal inclination within one year of surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 1995;82:608–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ortiz H, De Miguel M, Armendáriz P, Rodriguez J, Chocarro C. Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:375–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hallböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996;224:58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ho YH, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Br J Surg 1996;83:978–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hallböök O, Nyström P-O, Sjödahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:332–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagani RA, Istvan G, Chevreau P. Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1997;84:1449–51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ, Donaldson DR. Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision. Br J Surg 1988;75:318–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berger A, Tiret E, Parc R,et al. Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum. World J Surg 1992;16:470–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pélissier EP, Blum D, Bachour A, Bosset JF. Functional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:843–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Comparison between the colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis and healthy rectum: clinical and physiological function. Br J Surg 1997;84:1437–41.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lazorthes F, Gamagani R, Chiotasso P, Istvan G, Muhammad S. Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1409–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K,et al. Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch: prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:986–91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T,et al. Indications for colonic J-pouch reconstruction after anterior resection for rectal cancer: determining the optimum level of anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:558–63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Tokoro T, Wakano T, Uchida T. Enlargement of colonic pouch after proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis: potential cause for evacuation difficulty. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1181–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindquist K, Liljeqvist, Sellberg B. The topography of ileoanal reservoirs in relation to evacuation patterns and clinical functions. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:573–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch., eds. UICC TNM Classification of malignant tumours. 5th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1997:66–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Lauwers GY. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1994;219:365–73.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun WM, Read NW, Katsinelos P, Donnelly TC, Shorthouse AJ. Anorectal function after restorative proctocolectomy and low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1994;81:280–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pescatori M, Manhire A, Bartram CI. Evacuation pouchography in the evaluation of ileoanal reservoir function. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:365–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tsao JI, Galandiuk S, Pemberton JH. Pouchogram: predictor of clinical outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:547–51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thoeni RF, Fell SC, Engelstad B, Schrock TB. Ileoanal pouches: comparison of CT, scintigraphy, and contrast enemas for diagnosing post surgical complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stelzner M, Fonkalsrud EW, Lichtenstein G. Significance of reservoir length in the endorectal ileal pullthrough with ileal reservoir. Arch Surg 1988;123:1265–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hennild V, Kjærgård H, Hansen LK. Radiologic evaluation of the continent (S-pouch) ileal reservoir with anal anastomosis. Acta Radiol [Diagn] (Stockh) 1986;27:301–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hillard AE, Mann FA, Becker JM, Nelson JA. The ileoanal J pouch: radiographic evaluation. Radiology 1985;155:591–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kremers PW, Scholz FJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA. Radiology of the ileoanal reservoir. AJR 1985;145:559–67.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Becker JM, Hillard AE, Mann FA, Kestenberg A, Nelson JA. Functional assessment after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull-through. World J Surg 1985;9:598–605.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and a grant for Cancer Research from the Osaka Cancer Foundation.

About this article

Cite this article

Hida, Ji., Yasutomi, M., Maruyama, T. et al. Horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis of the colonic J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 1560–1566 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236207

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236207

Key words

Navigation