Skip to main content
Log in

Rectal cancer in anorectal malformation with rectovestibular fistula

Sphincter-restoring surgery by anterior resection and dynamic vaginoanograciloplasty

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe and discuss the anosphincter-restoring procedure adopted in an adult patient with rectal cancer, affected by anorectal atresia and rectovestibular fistula not previously treated. METHODS: After anterior resection and transverse dissection of the rectovaginal septum, a straight double-staple low colorectal anastomosis was performed. A subcutaneous tunnel was extended from the inter-rectovaginal space, surrounding the pseudoanal orifice. The tunnel housed a left gracilis muscle arranged counter-clockwise and connected to an implanted stimulator. The vaginal and anorectal flaps were sutured longitudinally, thereby spacing out the two orifices and creating an anorectal angle. A temporary loop right colostomy was performed. RESULTS: The postoperative course was uneventful. After continuous electrostimulation training and colostomy takedown, the patient had improved continence (stimulator on) and normal defecation (stimulator off). CONCLUSIONS: The solution described seemed a suitable alternative to a pull-through procedure, which would have involved a colocutaneous anastomosis and the loss of the anorectal sensory function. Any previous anal transposition or pull-through procedures would have prevented the saving of the pre-existing “anus,” because of the interruption of the residual mesenteric vascular supply to the anorectal remnant secondary to mesorectal excision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassink EA, Rieu PN, Severijnen RS, vd Staak FH, Festen C. Are adults content or continent after repair for high anal atresia? A long-term follow-up study in patients 18 years of age and older. Ann Surg 1993;218:196–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ackroyd R, Nour S. Long-term faecal continence in infants born with anorectal malformations. J R Soc Med 1994;87:695–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rintala RJ, Lindhal HG. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty is superior to sacroperineal-sacroabdominoperineal pull-through: a long-term follow-up study in boys with high anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:334–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Polk HC Jr, Welch JP, Nagaraj HS, Amin M. Rectosigmoidal adenocarcinoma after successful pull-through for imperforate anus and rectourethral fistula: a footnote to Dr. Hugh Young's 1933 operation. Johns Hopkins Med J 1982;151:151–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, Zocco G. Anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection: experience with double-wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1010–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F,et al. Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of fecal incontinence. Lancet 1991;338:1163–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seccia M, Menconi C, Balestri R, Cavina E. Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:897–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stephens FD, Smith ED. Classification, identification, and assessment of surgical treatment of anorectal anomalies. Report of a Workshop Meeting held on May 25–27, 1984, at “Wingspread” Convention Center, the Johnson Foundation, Racine, Wisconsin, USA. Pediatr Surg Int 1986;1:200–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991;338:1166–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abercrombie JF, Rogers J, Williams NS. Total anorectal reconstruction results in complete anorectal sensory loss. Br J Surg 1996;83:57–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Violi V, Roncoroni L, Boselli AS, De Cesare C, Livrini M, Peraccia A. Total anorectal reconstruction by double graciloplasty. Experience with delayed, selective use of implantable pulse generators. Int J Colorectal Dis 1999;14:164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nixon H, Puri P. Results of treatment of anorectal anomalies. A 13–20 year follow-up. J Pediatr Surg 1977;12:27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saxena N, Bhattacharyya C. Perineal anal transplant in low anorectal anomalies. Surgery 1981;90:464–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stephens FD, Smith ED. Operative management of rectal deformities. In: Stephens FD, Smith ED, eds. Anorectal malformations in children. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publisher, 1971:212–57.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kiesewetter WB. Imperforate anus. The role and results of the sacro-abdomino-perineal operation. Ann Surg 1966;164:655–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peña A. Surgical treatment of high imperforate anus. World J Surg 1985;9:236–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by grants from the Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Repubblica Italiana.

About this article

Cite this article

Violi, V., Boselli, A.S., Sarli, L. et al. Rectal cancer in anorectal malformation with rectovestibular fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 1043–1048 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235495

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235495

Key words

Navigation