Skip to main content
Log in

Primaryvs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV)

A prospective outcome and cost analysis

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our hypothesis was that in patients with perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis and peritonitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV) a one-stage sigmoid colon resection is safe and cost effective when performed by an experienced colorectal surgeon. We evaluated outcome and cost of one-stagevs. two-stage sigmoid colon resection after diverticulitis perforation and peritonitis. METHODS: Patients undergoing emergency resection for perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis and peritonitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV). Outcome, costs, and insurers reimbursement were compared between 13 patients undergoing sigmoid colon resection and primary anastomosis (Group A) and 42 patients undergoing sigmoid colon resection with Hartmann's procedure and secondary descendorectostomy (Group B). RESULTS: Group A patients were comparable to Group B patients in age, gender, preoperative risk and severity of peritonitis (Mannheim Peritonitis Index and C-reactive protein). Operating room time for sigmoid colon resection with primary anastomosis (3.3±1.2 hours) was identical to the time for sigmoid colon resection with colostomy (3.3±1 hour), and morbidity and mortality, intensive care unit, and in-hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. In Group B patients' intestinal continuity was restored 169±74 days after the primary resection in 32 of 42 patients only (78 percent). The second procedure took on average 1.4 hours longer than the first procedure. Patients in Group B received more antibiotics (2.2vs. 2) albeit for a shorter period of time (4.5vs. 5.7 days,P = not significant). Overall expenses for restoration of intestinal continuity were between 74 and 229 percent higher for Group B patients than for Group A patients. Reimbursement was 18,191±16,761 SFr (Group A) and 41,321±26,983 SFr (Group B) respectively. CONCLUSION: With meticulous surgical technique and extensive intraoperative lavage, perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis with peritonitis can be treated by a one-stage sigmoid colon resection and anastomosis with a low mortality and morbidity. A one-stage procedure is considerably cheaper and patients are rehabilitated faster and to a higher percentage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krukowski ZH, Matheson NA. Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalized and faecal peritonitis: a review. Br J Surg 1984;71:921–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee EC, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr. Intraoperative colonic lavage in nonelective surgery for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:669–74.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kastel M, Schultheis KH, Haubenreisser F, Gebhardt C. Discontinuity resection in therapy of complicated sigmoid diverticulitis. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl 1997;114:120–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nagorney DM, Adson MA, Pemberton JH. Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:71–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rodkey GV, Welch CE. Changing patterns in the surgical treatment of diverticular disease. Ann Surg 1984;200:46–78.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wedell J, Banzhaf G, Chaoui R, Fischer R, Reichmann J. Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 1997;84:380–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rothlin M, Rietschi G, Largiader F. Value of Hartmann's operation as an emergency intervention in sigmoid diverticulitis. Swiss Surg 1997;3:107–11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson DN, Driver CP, Davidson AI, Keenan RA. Diverticular disease in patients under 50 years of age. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1997;42:102–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smirniotis V, Tsoutsos D, Fotopoulos A, Pissiotis AC. Perforated diverticulitis: a surgical dilemma. Int Surg 1992;77:44–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huber MA, Woisetschlager R, Sulzbacher H, Wayand W. Surgical therapy of complicated diverticular disease [in German]. Zentralbl Chir 1991;116:999–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pratschner TH, Pecoraro K, Schemper M, Schiessel R. Prognostic factors for survival in perforated colonic diverticulitis. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1989;374:280–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK. Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 1978;12:85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U, Wesch G, Streifensand RA, Gundlach E. The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis [in German]. Chirurg 1987;58:84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bottger TC, Junginger T. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections. World J Surg 1999;23:164–71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sasako M. Risk factors for surgical treatment in the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial. Br J Surg 1997;84:1567–71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bellantone R, Sitges-Serra A, Bossola M,et al. Transfusion timing and postoperative septic complications after gastric cancer surgery: a retrospective study of 179 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 1998;133:988–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Houbiers JG, van de Velde CJ, van de Watering LM,et al. Transfusion of red cells is associated with increased incidence of bacterial infection after colorectal surgery: a prospective study. Transfusion 1997;37:126–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Schilling, M.K., Maurer, C.A., Kollmar, O. et al. Primaryvs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV). Dis Colon Rectum 44, 699–703 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234569

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234569

Key words

Navigation