Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of magnetic sacral root stimulation on anorectal pressure and volume

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Electrical sacral root stimulation induces defecation in spinal cord injury patients and is currently under examination as a new therapy for fecal incontinence. In contrast to electrical stimulation, magnetic stimulation is noninvasive. To gain more insight into the mechanism of action of sacral root stimulation, we studied the effects of magnetic sacral root stimulation on anorectal pressure and volume in both fecal incontinence and spinal cord injury patients. METHODS: Three groups were examined: 14 healthy volunteers, 18 fecal incontinence patients, and 14 spinal cord injury patients. Repetitive magnetic sacral root stimulation was performed bilaterally using bursts of five seconds at 5 Hz. Anal and rectal pressure changes and rectal volume changes were measured. RESULTS: An increase in anal pressure was seen in 100 percent of the control subjects, in 86 percent of the spinal cord injury patients, and in 73 percent of the fecal incontinence patients (P=0.03). The overall median pressure rise after right-sided and left-sided stimulation was 12 (interquartile range, 8–18.5) and 13 (interquartile range, 6–18) mmHg at the mid anal level. A decrease in rectal volume was provoked in 72 percent of the control subjects, in 79 percent of the spinal cord injury patients, and in 50 percent of the fecal incontinence patients. Overall median volume changes after right-sided and left-sided stimulation were 10 (range, 5–22) and 9 (range, 5–21) percent from baseline volume. An increase in rectal pressure could be measured in 56 percent of the control subjects, 77 percent of the fecal incontinence patients, and 43 percent of the spinal cord injury patients. Median pressure rises after right-sided and left-sided stimulation were 5 (range, 3–12) and 5 (range, 3–5) mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic sacral root stimulation produces an increase in anal and rectal pressure and a decrease in rectal volume in healthy subjects and patients with fecal incontinence or a spinal cord injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rijkhoff NJ, Wijkstra H, Van Kerrebroeck PE, Debruyne FM. Urinary bladder control by electrical stimulation: review of electrical stimulation techniques in spinal cord injury. Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16:39–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Kerrebroeck PE. The role of electrical stimulation in voiding dysfunction. Eur Urol 1998;34(Suppl 1):27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MacDonagh RP, Sun WM, Smallwood R, Forster D, Read NW. Control of defecation in patients with spinal injuries by stimulation of sacral anterior nerve roots. BMJ 1990;300:1494–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1995;346:1124–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Turner IC, Nicholls RJ, Woloszko J. Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence. Gut 1999;44:407–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jost WH, Schimrigk K. Magnetic stimulation of the pudendal nerve. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:697–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Loening BV, Read NW, Yamada T, Barker AT. Evaluation of the motor and sensory components of the pudendal nerve. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;93:35–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamdy S, Enck P, Aziz Q, et al. Spinal and pudendal nerve modulation of human corticoanal motor pathways. Am J Physiol 1998;274:G419-G423.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin VW, Wolfe V, Frost FS, Perkash I. Micturition by functional magnetic stimulation. J Spinal Cord Med 1997;20:218–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McFarlane JP, Foley SJ, de WP, Shah PJ, Craggs MD. Acute suppression of idiopathic detrusor instability with magnetic stimulation of the sacral nerve roots. Br J Urol 1997;80:734–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamanishi T, Yasuda K, Suda S, Ishikawa N, Sakakibara R, Hattori T. Effect of functional continuous magnetic stimulation for urinary incontinence. J Urol 2000;163:456–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheriff MK, Shah PJ, Fowler C, Mundy AR, Craggs MD. Neuromodulation of detrusor hyper-reflexia by functional magnetic stimulation of the sacral roots. Br J Urol 1996;78:39–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shafik A, El-Sibai O. Effect of magnetic stimulation on the contractile activity of the rectum in humans. Am Surg 2000;66:491–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shafik A. Suppression of uninhibited rectal detrusor by functional magnetic stimulation of sacral root. J Spinal Cord Med 2000;23:45–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Techniques of rectal compliance measurement. Sem Colon Rectal Surg 1992;3:88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rogers J, Henry MM, Misiewicz JJ. Disposable pudendal nerve stimulator: evaluation of the standard instrument and new device. Gut 1988;29:1131–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Felt-Bersma RJ, Gort G, Meuwissen SG. Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepatogastroenterology 1991;38:444–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schultz LD, Jiang C, Lindstrom S, Thuroff JW. Experimental results on mechanisms of action of electrical neuromodulation in chronic urinary retention. World J Urol 1998;16:301–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Craggs M, McFarlane J. Neuromdulation of the lower urinary tract. Exp Physiol 1999;84:149–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the XVIII Biennial Congress of The International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons, São Paulo, Brazil, July 23 to 27, 2000.

About this article

Cite this article

Morren, G.L., Walter, S., Hallböök, O. et al. Effects of magnetic sacral root stimulation on anorectal pressure and volume. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 1827–1833 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234462

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234462

Key words

Navigation