Skip to main content
Log in

Public attitudes on environment, energy and the economy — Implications for policy

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

During the last ten years environmental quality and energy have emerged as important national issues right along with the economy. The central proposition appears to be that environmental concerns are inversely related to concern about energy and the economy. The common assumptions about public perception of the trade-offs between environmental quality, economic growth, and energy production are shown to be invalid. In any event it is unlikely that public policy makers will find themselves strongly pulled by a highly polarized public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABC News/Harris Survey (1979)ABC News/Harris Survey, Vol. 2.

  • Albrecht, S. L. and Mauss, A. L. (1975) The Environment as a social problem. In A. L. Mauss (ed.),Social Problems as Social Movements, J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp. 556–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althoff, P. and Greig, W. H. (1977) Environmental pollution control: Two views from the general population.Environment and Behavior, 9 (3), September, 441–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttell, F. H. (1975) The environmental movement: consensus, conflict and change.J. Environmental Education, 7 (1), Fall, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1964) Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In B. A. Maher (ed.),Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 170–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality (1980)Public Opinion on Environmental Issues, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. H. (1978)Energy Politics, 2nd ed., St. Martin's, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1972) Up and down with ecology—the “issue-attention” cycle.Public Interest, No. 28, Summer, 38–50.

  • Dunlap, R. E. and Dillman, D. A. (1976) Decline in public support for environmental protection: Evidence from a 1970–1974 panel study.Rural Sociology, 41 (3), Fall, 382–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton Institute of Politics (1979)The New Jersey Public's Willingness to Pay For Clean Air, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (1975)The Politics of Pollution in a Comparative Perspective, David McKay, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1973) The Entropy law and the economic problem. In H. Daly (ed.),Toward a Steady-State Economy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, R. and Daneker, G. (1979)Energy, Jobs and the Economy, Alyson Publications, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1971) Work and leisure: Situational attitudes.Pacific Sociological Review, 14 (3), July, 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, G. (1979) Lofty environmental goals delayed.The New York Times December 30, Section 12, p. 10.

  • Jones, C. O. (1975)Clean Air: The Policies and Politics of Pollution Control, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, A. B. (1977)Soft Energy Paths, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. (1980)Final Results of the Resources for the Future National Environmental Survey for the President's Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, D.C.

  • Mobil Oil Corporation (1979) Some energy options that haven't been discussed. Advertisement placed in theWall Street Journal (August 7) and elsewhere.

  • Nie Normanet al. (1975)Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd edn., McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the President (1981)Actions to Help the U.S. Auto Industry, Washington, D.C.

  • Reisner, M. (1979) Inflation and the environment.Amicus, 1 (2), Fall, 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. J. (1980) Public attitudes and alternative energy systems: The end-user perspective. In G. Daneke and A. Lagassa (eds.),Energy Policy and Public Administration, Lexington, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1978) No sense of urgency.New Jersey Magazine, 8 (2), Summer, 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, W. A. (1977)The Politics of Environmental Concern, 2nd ed., Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, L. E. (1979) National energy policy: Blueprint or maze?Public Utilities Fortnightly, 104 (7) September 27, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobaugh, R. and Yergin, D. (1979)Energy Future: Report of the Energy Project at the Harvard Business School, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoel, T. B. Jr. (1979) Revising the American dream,Amicus, 1 (2), Fall, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. (1979) Preparing for the future in electric power.Public Utilities Fortnightly, 103 (8), April 12, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liere, K. D. and Dunlap, R. E. (1979) The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta, Ga.

  • Weinstein, N. D. (1979) Individual differences in critical tendencies and noise annoyance.J. Sound and Vibration, 66 (4), December.

  • Winham, G. (1971) Attitudes on pollution and growth in Hamilton, or “There's an awful lot of talk these days about ecology.”Canadian J. Political Science, 5 (3), September, 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

David J. Rosen is an assistant professor in the Department of Human Ecology, Cook College of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences, Rutgers University (U.S.A.) where he teaches in the interdisciplinary International Environmental Studies and Human Ecology curricula. While formally trained as a political scientist (Ph D, Rutgers University, 1975) for the past six years his research on energy and environmental matters has become increasingly interdisciplinary. The subjects of his work have ranged from the international energy system to the provision of solar energy incentives by state government. He has also served as a consultant to government and private organizations on a number of energy and environmental projects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, D.J. Public attitudes on environment, energy and the economy — Implications for policy. Environmentalist 1, 187–195 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02233109

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02233109

Keywords

Navigation