Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Archaeology without gravity: Postmodernism and the past

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interdisciplinary approaches to the study of the past and the present have become commonplace: anthropologists now situate cultures in their historical contexts, while historians pursue particularistic ends within politicoeconomic or ideational structures. Archaeologists have cast their nets even more widely, not only toward anthropology and history, but to fields ranging from molecular biology to hermeneutics. Postmodernist approaches maintain that archaeologists should be looking at the past from multiple perspectives and listening to its multivocality. Archaeologists, in fact, not only develop different ways of understanding the past, but actually develop alternative pasts. This paper argues that multiple paths to alternative pasts enhance archaeological understanding and, at the same time, stimulate the development of archaeological theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Alcoff, L. (1988). Poststructuralism and cultural feminism.Signs 13(3): 4–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (ed.) (1986).The Social Life of Things, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. C. (1988). Fields of discourse: reconstituting a social archaeology.Critique of Anthropology 7(3): 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. C. (1994a).Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. C. (1994b). Postmodern creationists? Posting onArch-Theory bulletin board (arch-theory@mailbase. ac. uk), 23 Nov. (text in author's files).

  • Baudrillard, J. (1983).Simulations, Semiotext(e), New York.

  • Bender, B. (1993). Cognitive archaeology and cultural materialism.Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3: 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1994). Feminism and the question of postmodernism.Polity Reader in Gender Studies, Policy Press, Cambridge, pp. 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1989).Reclaiming Reality, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology.American Antiquity 28: 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1977).For Theory Building in Archaeology, Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bintliff, J. L. (1991). Post-modernism, rhetoric and scholasticism at TAG: the current state of British archaeological theory.Antiquity 65(247): 274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bintliff, J. L. (1993). Why Indiana Jones is smarter than the post-processualists.Norwegian Archaeological Review 26: 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, R. (1990).Foucault and Derrida: The Other Side of Reason, Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. (1990). Feminism, postmodernism, and gender-scepticism. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. M. (1992). Breaking and entering the ecosystem—Gender, class, and faction steal the show.American Anthropologist 94: 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, E. M. (1994). Abraham Lincoln as authentic reproduction: A critique of postmodernism.American Anthropologist 96: 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, V. (1986).The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Postmodernity, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. (ed.) (1991).New Perspectives on Historical Writing, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, G. (1990). The joker is wild, the text untameable: The analytics of homo analogicus (anthropology, post-structuralism, and post modernism). In Bapty, I., and Yates, T. (eds),Archaeology After Structuralism, Routledge, London, pp. 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (1989).Against Post Modernism, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1961).What Is History? Pelican, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrian, T., Connell, R. W., and Lee, J. (1985). Towards a new sociology of masculinity.Theory and Society 14: 551–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, J. F. (1987). Power in space: Archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In Wagstaff, J. M. (ed.),Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives, Blackwell, London, pp. 146–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, B. (1988). The race for theory.Feminist Studies 14: 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. L. (1978).Analytical Archaeology, 2nd ed., Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1946).The Idea of History, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W., with Williams, S. H. (1991). Original narratives: the political economy of gender in archaeology. In di Leonardo, M. (ed.),Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 102–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowgill, G. L. (1993). Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Beyond criticizing the New Archaeology.American Anthropologist 95: 551–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, G. (1981).A Short History of Archaeology, Thames and Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S., and Cosgrove, D. E. (1988). Introduction: iconography and landscape. In Cosgrove, D. E., and Daniels, S., (eds.),The Iconography of Landscape Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. (1992). The deconstruction of intentionality in archaeology.Antiquity 66(251): 334–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1981).Positions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Leonardo, M. (ed.) (1991).Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-A., and Hoffman, C. R. (1994). Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology.Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1(3): 211–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, S. L. (1982). Archaeological survey in the Mediterranean basin: A review of recent research.American Antiquity 47: 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, S. L. (1993). From New to New Age archaeology: archaeological theory and classical archaeology—a 1990s perspective.American Journal of Archaeology 97: 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. K., and Preucel, R. (1987). Processual archaeology and the radical critique.Current Anthropology 28: 501–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1987).Travels in Hyperreality, Picador, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelstad, E. (1991). Images of power and contradiction: feminist theory and post-processual archaeology.Antiquity 65(248): 502–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M. (1988) In pursuit of the postmodernism: an introduction.Theory, Culture and Society 5: 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory.Signs 12: 621–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1990). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fokkema, D., and H. Bertens (eds) (1986).Approaching Postmodernism, John Benjamins, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotiadis, M. (1994). What is archaeology's “mitigated objectivism” mitigated by? Comments on Wylie.American Antiquity 59: 545–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980).Power/Knowledge—Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Harvester Press, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., and Nicholson, L. J. (1990) Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1992). The past in the future: History and the politics of identity.American Anthropologist 94: 837–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C (1986). Hunter-gatherer studies and the origin of states. In Hall, J. A. (ed.),States in History, Blackwell, London, pp. 22–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, C (1993) Ancestors and agendas. In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.),Archaeological Theory—Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds.) (1990).The Politics of the Past, One World Archaeology 12, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1992).Postmodernism, Reason, and Religion, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J., and Conkey, M. W. (eds.) (1991).Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1982).Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J., and Chippendale, C. (1993). Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for Cycladic figurines.American Journal of Archaeology 97: 601–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, T. (1989). Postmodernism: Roots and politics. In Angus, I., and Jhally, S. (eds),Cultural Politics in Contemporary America, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 347–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, A. (1983). Texts and archaeology at Tell Ta'annek.Berytus 31: 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, A. (1985). Tradition and change in two archaeologies.American Antiquity 50: 464–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. R. (1992). Image and environment: The decline of cognitive behaviouralism in human geography and grounds for regeneration.Geoforum 23: 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1986).The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C. (1992). Is what write right?Antiquity 66(252): 803–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C. (1994).Social Being and Time, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J. (1986).Philosophy and Feminist Thinking, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutterman, D. S. (1994). Postmodernism and the interrogation of masculinity. In Brod, H., and Kaufmann, M. (eds.),Theorizing Masculinities, Research on Men and Masculinities 5, Sage, London, pp. 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1986).Autonomy and Solidarity, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 190–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1990). Feminism, science, and the anti-enlightenment critiques. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. (1987). Rethinking modernism: Minority vs. majority theories.Cultural Critique 7: 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990).The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, L. (1993). Unearthing prehistoric cultural landscapes: A view from Australia.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers n.s.18: 481–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. D. (1993). Can we recognise a different European past? A contrastive archaeology of later prehistoric settlement in southern England.Journal of European Archaeology 1: 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. A. (ed.) (1987).Archaeology as Long-Term History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. A. (1989a). Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology. In Hodder, I. (ed.),The Meanings of Things, One World Archaeology 6, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. A. (1989b). Writing archaeology: Site reports in context.Antiquity 63(239): 268–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. A. (1990).Archaeology and the post-modern.Anthropology Today 6(5): 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. A. (1991a). Postprocessual archaeology and the current debate. In Preucel, R. W. (ed.),Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Carbondale, IL, pp. 30–41.

  • Hodder, I. A. (1991b). Archaeological theory in contemporary European societies: The emergence of competing traditions. In Hodder, I. (ed.),Archaeological Theory in Europe, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. A. (1991c). Interpretive archaeology and its role.American Antiquity 56: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. A. (ed.) (1991d).Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. A. (1991e).Reading the Past, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism.New Left Review 146: 53–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, H., and B. Olsen (1992). Hermeneutics and archaeology: On the philosophy of contextual archaeology.American Antiquity 57: 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsnorth, A. (1993). Complexities of complexity: An anthropological concern.Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 292: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, T. (1991). Structure, agency, and power relations “Chez les Derniers Chasseurs-Cueilleurs” of northwestern France. In Preucel, R. W. (ed.),Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 108–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klejn, L. S. (1993). To separate a centaur: on the relationship of archaeology and history in the Soviet tradition.Antiquity 67(255): 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, A. B. (ed.) (1992).Archaeology, Annales and Ethnohistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroker, A., and D. Cook (1986).The Postmodern Scene: Excremental Culture and the Hyper-Aesthetics, St Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (1989). Introduction. In C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (ed.),Archaeological Thought in America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1990).Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B. (1992). Art, science, or politics? The crisis in hunter-gatherer studies.American Anthropologist 94: 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. P., and Potter, P. B., Jr. (1992). Legitimation and the classification of archaeological sites.American Antiquity 57: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longacre, W. A. (1970).Archaeology as Anthropology: A Case Study, Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona 17, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond, S. (1989). Feminism and postmodernism.New Left Review 178: 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1985).The Past is a Foreign Country, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984).The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, (translated by Bennington, G. and Massouri, B.) University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., and Fischer, M. (1986).Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia-Lees, F., Sharpe, P. and Cohen, C. B. (1989). The postmodernist turn in anthropology.Signs 15: 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J. (1990). Review article of P. Courbin,What is Archaeology? (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988).History and Theory 30: 246–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (1986). Ce qui à change dans la vie intellectuale française.Revue le débat 40(été): 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. (1993). The childhood of William Lanne: contact archaeology and Aboriginality in Tasmania.Antiquity 67(256): 504–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, L. J. (ed.) (1990).Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paddaya, K. (1990).The New Archaeology and Aftermath: A View from Outside the Anglo-American World, Ravish, Pune.

  • Patterson, T. C. (1989). History and the post-processual archaeologies.Man 24: 555–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peebles, C. S. (1991).Annalistes, hermeneutics and positivists: squaring circles or dissolving problems. In Bintliff, J. (Ed.),The Annales School and Archaeology, Leicester University Press, Leicester, pp. 108–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peebles, C. S. (1993). Aspects of a cognitive archaeology.Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3: 250–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, F. (1991). Central themes in archaeology. In Kottak, C. P. (ed.),Central Themes in the Teaching of Anthropology, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, P. B., Jr. (1991). Self-reflection in archaeology. In Preucel, R. W. (ed.),Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, R. W. (ed.) (1991a).Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, R. W. (1991b). Introduction. in Preucel, R. W. (ed.),Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper, 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., and Lewis, M. (1993). The reinvention of cultural geography.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. L. (1991). Distinguished lecture in archeology: In defense of the seventies.American Anthropologist 93: 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, A. C. (1980). The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: Archaeology as anthropology.American Journal of Archaeology 84: 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, A. C. (1994). Towards a cognitive archaeology. In Renfrew, C., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.),The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, A. C., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds) (1994).The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, J. (1981). The development of the Three Age System: Archaeology's first paradigm. In Daniel, G. (ed.),Towards a History of Archaeology, London, Thames and Hudson, pp. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, P. M. (1992).Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1978).Orientalism, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1985). Orientalism revisited. In Barker, F. (ed.),Europe and its Other, University of Essex Press, Colchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitta, D. (1992). Radical archaeology and middle-range methodology.Antiquity 66(253): 886–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1976).Behavioral Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1988). The structure of archaeological theory.American Antiquity 53: 461–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1992). Archaeology and behavioral science: manifesto for an imperial archaeology. In Wandsnider, L. (ed.),Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology's Future, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 20, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1989). History in crisis? The other's side of the story.American Historical Review 94: 680–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (ed.) (1994).The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S., and Wagner, D. G. (eds.) (1992).Postmodernism and Social Theory: The Debate Over General Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., and Hodder, I. A. (1994). Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In Hodder, I. A., Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carman, J., Last, J., and Lucas G. (eds.),Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1989). Archaeology into the 1990s.Norwegian Archaeological Review 22: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1992).Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, A. G. (1993). The relativity of theory. In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds),Archaeological Theory—Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (1995). What is this thing called postprocessual archaeology ... and is it relevant for Australian archaeology?Australian Archaeology 40: 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, A. M. (1985). The new archaeology and the classical archaeologist.American Journal of Archaeology 89: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, R. W. (1989).Postmodern Geographies, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. (1991). What this awl means: Toward a feminist archaeology. In Gero, J. M. and Conkey, M. W. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 388–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauth, G., and Turner, B. S. (1988). Nostalgia, postmodernism and the critique of mass culture.Theory, Culture and Society 5: 509–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. G. (1989). Sourdoughs and cheechakos: The formation of identity-signaling social groups.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 270–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, J. (1990). Storytelling and prehistory. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Archaeological Method and Theory 2, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1990). Some, other, analogue: Writing the past. In Baker, F., and Thomas, J. (eds.),Writing the Past in the Present, Department of Archaeology, St David's University College, Lampeter, pp. 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1993). After essentialism: Archaeology, geography and post-modernity.Archaeological Review from Cambridge 12: 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., and Tilley, C. (1992). TAG and “post-modernism”: A reply to John Bintliff.Antiquity 66(250): 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (1989). Excavation as theatre.Antiquity 63(239): 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (1990). On modernity and archaeological discourse. In Bapty, I., and Yates, T. (eds.),Archaeology After Structuralism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (ed.) (1993).Interpretative Archaeology, Berg, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (1989a). Hyperrelativism, responsibility, and the social sciences.Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 26: 776–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (1989b).A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (1991a). Post-processual developments in Anglo-American archaeology.Norwegian Archaeological Review 24: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tringham, R. (1991b). Households with faces: The challenge of gender in prehistoric architectural remains. In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. W. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 93–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, S. (1984). The poetic turn in postmodern anthropology—the poetry of Paul Friedrich.American Anthropologist 86: 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G. (1988).The End of Postmodernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-Modern Culture, Polity Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K. (1990). The Post-Modern threat to the past. In Bapty, I., and Yates, T. (eds),Archaeology After Structuralism, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 278–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K. (1992).The Representation of the Past: Museums and Heritage in the Post-Modern World, Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J. (1991). A parochial primer: The new dissonance as seen from the Midcontinental United States. In Preucel, R. W. (ed.),Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies: Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 10, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J., and Fotiadis, M. (1990). The razor's edge: Symbolic-structuralist archaeology and the expansion of archaeological inference.American Anthropologist 92: 613–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. A. (1990). Ozymandias, King of Kings: Postprocessual radical archaeology as critique.American Antiquity 55: 673–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, D. S. (1992). Prehistory and post-positivist science: A prolegomenon to cognitive archaeology. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Archaeological Theory and Method 4, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 57–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. (1994). Perilous ideas: Race, culture, people.Current Anthropology 35: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1992a). On “heavily decomposing red herrings”: Scientific method in archaeology and the ladening of evidence with theory. In Embree, L. (ed.),Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1992b). Feminist theories of social power: Some implications for a processual archaeology.Norwegian Archaeological Review 25: 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1992c). The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: recent archaeological research on gender.American Antiquity 57: 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1993). Invented lands, discovered pasts: The westward expansion of myth and history.Historical Archaeology 27: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, T. (1990). Jacques Derrida: “There is nothing outside of the text.” In Tilley, C. (ed.),Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics, and Poststructuralism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 206–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffee, N. (1993). Too many chiefs? (or, safe texts for the '90s). In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.),Archaeological Theory—Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (1993a). Introduction: The sources of archaeological theory. In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.),Archaeological Theory—Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.) (1993b).Archaeological Theory—Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. B. W. (1994). Knowledge representation and archaeology: A cognitive example using GIS. In Renfrew, C., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.),The Ancient Mind: Elements of a Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Archaeology, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland

    A. Bernard Knapp

Authors
  1. A. Bernard Knapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knapp, A.B. Archaeology without gravity: Postmodernism and the past. J Archaeol Method Theory 3, 127–158 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02232772

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02232772

Key words

Search

Navigation