Skip to main content
Log in

Fluorocinematography

  • Current Gastroenterology
  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Vantrappen, G., Liemer, M. D., andTexter, E. C., Jr. Fluorocinematography and intraluminal pressure recordings in the study of esophageal motor activity: method and perspectives.Fed. Proc. 17:162, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Texter, E. C., Jr., Vantrappen, G., Liemer, M. D., andBarborka, C. J. Methods for studying gastrointestinal motility.Quart. Bull. Northwestern Univ. M. School 32:281, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cannon, W. B., andMoser, A. The movements of the food in the esophagus.Am. J. Physiol. 1:435, 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Templeton, F. E. Twenty-five years of progress (IX): Gastrointestinal radiology.Am. J. Digest. Dis. n.s., 4:661, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gianturco, C., andAlvarez, W. C. Roentgen ray motion pictures of the stomach.Proc. Staff Meet. Mayo Clin. 7:669, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan, R. H. Personal communication, Aug. 1, 1960.

  7. van der Sande, J. J. An electro-optical image intensifier with a 12 1/2 inch field. In U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Laboratories, Corps of Engineers:Image Intensifier Symposium, sponsored by Warfare Vision Branch, Electrical Engineering Department, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 1958, p. 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tristan, T. A. Methods of cinefluorography. In Ramsey, G. H. S., Watson, J. S., Tristan, T. A.,et al. (eds.)Cinefluorography, Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1960, p. 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feddma, J. The nine-inch image intensifier. In Ramsey, G. H. S., Watson, J. S., Tristan, T. A.,et al. (eds.):Cinefluorography, Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1960, p. 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abrams, H. L. Biplane cinefluorography with eleven-inch image intensifiers. In Ramsey, G. H. S., Watson, J. S., Tristan, T. A.,et al. (eds.):Cinefluorography, Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1960, p. 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ball, J. Eight-inch image amplifier. In Ramsey, G. H. S., Watson, J. S., Tristan, T. A.,et al. (eds.):Cinefluorography, Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1960, p. 218–227.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bryers, H. P., andBouwers, A. An electro-optical image intensifier with a twelve-and-a-half inch field. In Ramsey, G. H. S., Watson, J. S., Tristan, T. A.,et al. (eds.):Cinefluorography, Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1960, p. 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lignon, A., andBotden, A. Image intensification. In Ramsey, G. H. S., Watson, J. S., Tristan, T. A.,et al.. (eds.):Cinefluorography, Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1960, p. 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, F. E. Electroluminescence and light-amplifying phosphors applied to fluoroscopic image intensification.Am. J. Roentgenol. 75:77–82, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lusted, L. B. The image intensifier need in radiology. In U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Laboratories, Corps of Engineers:Image Intensifier Symposium, sponsored by Warfare Vision Branch, Electrical Engineering Department, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 1958, p. 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harper, H. M., andReynolds, S. J. Safe exposures in cineradiography.Brit. J. Radiol. 29:461, 1956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs, J. E. Television applied to cinefluorography. In Ramsey, G. H. S., Watson, J. S., Tristan, T. A.,et al. (eds.):Cinefluorography, Thomas, Springfield, III., 1960, p. 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan, R. H., andSturm, R. E. The Johns Hopkins fluoroscopic screen intensifier.Radiology 57:556, 1951.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stauffer, H. M., Oppenheimer, M. J., Steward, G. H., III, andBlackstone, A. W. Practical image amplifier technics; fluoroscopy, cinefluorography, spot-film radiography and use with closed-circuit television.Radiology 65:784, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs, J. E., andBerger, H. Large-area photoconductive pick-up tube performance.Elect. Eng. 75:158, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chejfec, G., Danemann, H. A., Milewski, J., Texter, E. C., Jr., andBarborka, C. J. Fluorocinematographic and manometric studies of esophageal motility in patients with achalasia. IRE Trans. on Medical Electronics.ME 7:225, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rushmer, R. F., andHendron, J. A. The act of deglutition: a cinefluorographic study.J. Appl. Physiol. 3:622, 1951.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramsey, G. H., Watson, J. S., Gramiak, R., andWeinberg, S. A. Cinefluorographic analysis of the mechanism of swallowing.Radiology 64:498, 1955.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts, R. I. A cineradiographic investigation of pharyngeal deglutition.Brit. J. Radiol. 30:449, 1957.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shelton, R. L., Jr., Bosma, J. F., andSheets, B. V. Tongue, thyroid and larynx displacement in swallow and phonation.J. Appl. Physiol. 15:283, 1960.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nemet, A. The image intensifier tube in gastrointestinal cine-radiography and other applications.Radiography 21:1, 1955.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Porcher, M. P. Possibilitiés offertes par la radiocinématographic en pathologic digestive.Arch. mal. app. digest. 44:373, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vantrappen, G., Liemer, M. D., Ikeya, J., Texter, E. C., Jr., andBarborka, C. J. Simultaneous fluorocinematography and intraluminal pressure measurements in the study of esophageal motility.Gastroenterology 35:592, 1958.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vantrappen, G., Texter, E. C., Jr, Barborka, C. J., andVandenbroucke, J. The closing mechanism at the gastroesophageal junction.Am. J. Med. 38:564, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Texter, E. C., Jr Image intensifier and manometric techniques—lower end of the esophagus. In Card, W. I. (ed.):Modern Trends in Gastro-Enterology, 3d series, Butterworth, London, (in press).

  31. Lerche, W. The esophagus and pharynx in action. Thomas, Springfield, III., 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wolf, B. S., Marshak, R. H., Som, M. L., Brahms, S. A., andGreenberg, E. I. The gastroesophageal vestibule on roentgen examination: differentiation from the phrenic ampulla and minimal hiatal herniation.J. Mt. Sinai Hosp. New York 25:167, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fyke, F. E., Jr., Code, C. F., andSchlegel, J. F. The gastroesophageal sphincter in healthy human beings.Gastroenterologia 86:135, 1956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Monges, H. Donnecs anatomiques, radiologiques et physiologiques sur Phiatus oesophagien. InBiblioteca Gastroenterologia, Fasc, 1:Diagnoses Und Therapie Der Hiatushernia. Karger, Basel, 1960, p. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Botha, G. S. M. Radiological localization of the diaphragmatic hiatus.Lancet 1:662, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Botha, G. S. M., Astley, R., andCarre, I. J. Combined cineradiographic and manometric study of the gastroesophageal junction.Lancet 1:659, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Creamer, B., andPierce, J. W. Observations on the gastroesophageal junction during swallowing and drinking.Lancet 2:1309, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Botha, G. S. Mucosal folds at the cardia as a component of the gastro-oesophageal closing mechanism.Brit. J. Surg. 45:569, 1958.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Creamer, B., Harrison, K., andPierce, J. W. Further observations on the gastrooesophageal junction.Thorax 14:132, 1959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolf, B. S. The esophagogastric closing mechanism; role of the abdominal esophagus.J. Mt. Sinai Hosp. New York 27:404, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wolf, B. S. Roentgen features of the normal and herniated esophogastric region —problems in terminology.Am. J. Digest. Dis. 5:751, 1960.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Allcock, J., andBerridge, F. R. The clinical applications of image intensification (IV): Some applications of cinematography to the radiology of the oesophagus.Brit. J. Radiol. 29:560, 1956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Texter, E. C., Jr, Lazar, H. P., Puletti, E. J., andVantrappen, G. The characteristic pattern of esophageal dysfunction due to hiatal hernia demonstrated by fluorocinematography and simultaneous pressure recording.J. Clin. Invest. 38:1048, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Texter, E. C., Jr., andBundfsen, W. E. Diagnosis of Hiatal Hernia.Am. J. Digest. Dis. 5:493, 1960.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gross, F. S., Kay, E. B., andJohnson, G. F. Neuromuscular imbalance of the esophagus associated with hiatal hernia as studied by means of cinefluorography and intraluminal pressure recording.J. Thoracic Surg. 34:736, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  46. De Castro, J. M., andFerreira, J. Contribucao ao estudo cineradiografico do transito gastro-duodenal.Radiologia 7:44, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Smith, A. W., Code, C. F., andSchlegel, J. K. Simultaneous cineradiographic and kymographic studies of human gastric antral motility.J. Appl. Physiol. 11:12, 1957.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Texter, E. C., Jr., Vantrappen, G. R., Lazar, H. P., Puletti, E. J., andBarborka, C. J. Further observations on the mechanism of ulcer pain.Ann. Int. Med. 51:1275, 1959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Liljedahl, S. O., Mattson, O., Pernow, B., andWallensten, S. Cineroentgenographic studies of gastrointestinal motility in healthy subjects and in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer.Acta. chir. scandinav. 117:206, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Salmoni, E. Prime ossevozion soi tipi di motilita del juodeno e del diguino.Rass. ital. di gastroenterologia 7:370, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liljedahl, S. O., Mattson, O., andPernow, B. Cineroentgenography of the intestine with special reference to the effect of simulating agents upon motility.Acta radiol. 49:348, 1958.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jorgens, J. The application of cinefluorography to x-ray diagnosis.Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 78:904, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Code, C. F. Propulsion in the alimentary canal. Presented at 83d Meeting, American Physiological Society, Chicago, April 13, 1960.

  54. Texter, E. C., Jr. Pathophysiologic basis for diarrhea. In Mellinkoff, S. (ed.):Diarrhea, Blakiston, McGraw-Hill, New York (in press).

  55. Porcher, P., andCaroli, J. Étude cineradiomanometrique du reflux Wirsungien.Rev. internat. hepat. 5:875, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Caroli, J., Porcher, P., Pequiqnot, G., andDelatare, M. Contribution of cineradiography to study of the function of the human biliary tract.Am. J. Digest. Dis. 5:677, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kelsey, J. R., andBeard, E. F. Common bile duct pressures—results of an experimental study in human subjects with use of a strain gauge manometer.Gastroenterology 32:1122, 1957.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Menguy, R. B., Hellenbeck, G. A., Bollman, J. L., andGrindlay, J. H. Intraductal pressures and sphincteric resistance in canine pancreatic and biliary ducts after various stimuli.Surg. Gynec. & Obst. 106:306, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported in part by U. S. Public Health Service research grants (RG4633 Physiol. and A-2651), by a U. S. Public Health Service Training Grant (2A-5094) National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases, and the James Picker Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clinton Texter, E. Fluorocinematography. Digest Dis Sci 6, 983–1001 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02231430

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02231430

Keywords

Navigation