Skip to main content
Log in

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References cited

  • Aitken, M. J. (1985).Thermoluminescence Dating, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, M. J., and Hawley, H. N. (1971). Archaeomagnetism: evidence for magnetic refraction in kiln structure.Archaeometry 13: 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. E., Neff, H., and Bishop, R. L. (1991). Compositional analysis and “sources” of pottery: an ethnoarchaeological approach.American Anthropologist 93: 70–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. E. (1987).Craft Specialization in the Prehistoric Channel Islands, California, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. E. (ed.) (1992).Stone Tool Procurement, Production, and Distribution in California Prehistory, Perspectives in California Archaeology, Volume 2, UCLA Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, A., Feather, S. W., and Renfrew, C. (1972a). Neutron activation analysis of aegean obsidians.Nature 237: 333–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, A. A., Warren, S. E., Crummett, J. G., and Newton, R. G. (1972b). Neutron activation of faience beads.Archaeometry 14: 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, M. G. L. (1982).Tree-Ring Dating and Archaeology, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, M. G. L. (1993). Archaeological wood in Northern Ireland.Archeomaterials 7(1): 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, G. (1983). Electromagnetics for mapping buried earth features.Journal of Field Archaeology 10: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnichsen, R. (1973). Some operational aspects of human and animal bone alteration. In Gilbert, B. M. (ed.),Mammalian Osteo-Archaeology: North America, Missouri Archaeological Society, St. Louis, pp. 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, S. (1990).Radiocarbon Dating, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briuer, F. L. (1976). New clues to stone tool function: plant and animal residues.American Antiquity 41: 478–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. M., and Earle, T. K. (eds.) (1987).Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucha, V. (1971). Archaeomagnetic dating. In Michael, H. N., and Ralph, E. K. (eds.),Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, J. E., and Dayton, A. (1986). Uses and limitations of lead isotopes in archaeology. In Olin, J. S., and Blackman, M. J. (eds.),Proceedings of the 24th International Archaeometry Symposium, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 13–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, D., Baillie, M. G. L., and Egger, H. (1984).Dendrochronological Dating, Handbooks for Archaeologists No. 2. European Science Foundation, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, R. M. (1985).Trade, Technology, and the Ironworking Community in the Iron Age of Southern Britain, BAR British Series 144, Oxford.

  • Ehrenreich, R. M. (ed.) (1991).Metals in Society: Theory Beyond Analysis, MASCA, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C., and Meggers, B. J. (1960). A new dating method using obsidian: an archaeological evaluation of the new method.American Antiquity 25(4): 523–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feathers, J. K. (1993). Thermoluminescence dating of pottery from southeastern Missouri and the problem of radioactive disequilibrium.Archeomaterials 7(1): 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, I., Clark, D., and Smith, R. L. (1970). Obsidian dating. In Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.).Science in Archaeology, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R. (1989).Interpreting the Function of Stone Tools: The Quantification and Computerization of Microwear Analysis, BAR International Series 474, Oxford.

  • Henderson, J. (1989a). The scientific analysis of ancient glass and its archaeological interpretation. In Henderson, J. (ed.),Scientific Analysis in Archaeology, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, Monograph No. 19, Oxford, pp. 30–62.

  • Henderson, J. (ed.) (1989b).Scientific Analysis in Archaeology, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, Monograph No. 19, Oxford.

  • Huxtabel, J., and Aitken, M. J. (1986). Dating of European flint by thermoluminescence. In Olin, J. S., and Blackman, M. J. (eds.),Proceedings of the 24th International Archaeometry Symposium, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A., Stipp, J. J., and Tamers, M. A. (1986). Archaeological sherd dating: comparison of thermoluminescence dates with radiocarbon dates by beta counting and accelerator techniques.Radiocarbon 28: 719–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. H. (1980).Experimental Determinations of Stone Tools: A Microwear Analysis, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacheva, M. (1989). Archaeomagnetic studies as a dating tool and some considerations on the archaeomagnetic methodology. In Maniatis, Y. (ed.),Archaeometry, Elsevier, New York, pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Sala, I. (1986). Experimental replication of post-depositional surface modifications on flint. In Owen, R. L., and Unrath, G. (eds.),Early Man News, Vol. 9/10/11, Part 1, Tubingen, Germany, pp. 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libby, W. F. (1952).Radiocarbon Dating, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy, T. H. (1983). Prehistoric blood residues: detection on tool surfaces and identification of species of origin.Science 220: 1269–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, R. W. (1993). Faience beads of the Irish Bronze Age.Archeomaterials 7(1): 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, H. N., and Ralph, E. K. (eds.) (1971).Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, J. W. (1973).Dating Methods in Archaeology, Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, H. (1992a). Ceramics and evolution. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 141–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, H. (ed.) (1992b).Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northover, P. (1984). Iron Age bronze metallurgy in central southern Britain. In Cunliffe, B., and Miles, D. (eds.),Aspects of the Iron Age in Central Southern Britain, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology No. 2, Oxford, pp. 126–145.

  • Petkov, A. T., and Georgiev, M. I. (1989). Automatic and electromechanical equipment for electrical prospecting. In Maniatis, Y. (ed.),Archaeometry, Elsevier, New York, pp. 365–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plisson, H., and Mauger, M. (1988). Chemical and mechanical alteration of microwear polishes: an experimental approach.Helinium 28(1): 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. R., and Wilson, M. T. (1992). Blood residues on ancient tool surfaces: a cautionary note.Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. E. (1987).Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, C. J. (1986). Ground-penetrating radar surveys used in archaeological investigations.Geophysics 51(3): 595–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, P. C. (1985).Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R. B. (1993). Irish prehistoric goldwork: a provisional analysis.Archeomaterials 7(1): 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams-Thorpe, O., Warren, S. E., and Nandris, J. G. (1984). The distribution and provenance of archaeological obsidian in central and eastern Europe.Journal of Archaeological Science 11: 183–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ehrenreich, R.M. Archaeometry into archaeology. J Archaeol Method Theory 2, 1–6 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228433

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228433

Navigation