Skip to main content
Log in

Agonistic behaviour ofMyrmica rubra L.

Le comportement agonistique deMyrmica rubra L.

  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The behavioural repertory ofMyrmica rubra encountering an ant intruder has been described in quantifiable elements. Intruder species were the following:M. rubra, originating from the same natural society, but living in separate laboratory nests for the previous two years, true alienM. rubra, M. sabuleti, Tetramorium caespitum, Lasius flavus andL. niger. No qualitative differences showed up, except for predation againstL. flavus. Quantitative differences were not analyzed here.

  2. 2.

    A tentative flow diagram has been set up with these elements.

  3. 3.

    Correlations were calculated between the obviously aggressive seizing and the most frequent behaviours: threat (=mandibles opening, head down), gaster flexing (without stinging), carriage, self-cleaning and licking. Threat was always positively correlated with seizing, gaster flexing only when frequent enough. The aggressive motivation of some of these behaviours has been discussed.

  4. 4.

    A comparison is made between the agonistic behaviour ofM. rubra and that ofF. fusca (based on data fromWallis). Although minor differences showed up, the agonistic repertories of both species are rather similar.

  5. 5.

    The intruder's behaviour has also been observed: flight, pacifying responses, attack, and their efficiencies are discussed.

Résumé

  1. 1.

    Nous avons décrit sous forme d'éléments quantifiables le répertoire comportemental deMyrmica rubra face à une fourmi intruse. Les intruses appartenaient aux espèces suivantes:Myrmica rubra originaires de la même société naturelle, mais vivant séparées de leurs compagnes depuis deux ans,M. rubra étrangères,M. sabuleti, Tetramorium caespitum, Lasius flavus etL. niger.

    Aucune différence qualitative n'a pu être mise en évidence dans le comportement agressif envers les différents types d'intruses, exception faite de la prédation subie uniquement parL. flavus. Par contre, de grandes différences quantitatives sont apparues; elles n'ont pas été analysées ici.

  2. 2.

    A partir de ces éléments, nous avons ébauché un diagramme séquentiel.

  3. 3.

    Nous avons tenté d'établir des corrélations entre les prises (comportement évidemment agressif) et les autres comportements apparus (fréquemment: menace (ouverture des mandibules, tête basse), flexion de gaster (sans piqûre), transport, toilettage, léchage. La fréquence des menaces est toujours corrélée positivement à celle des prises. Une telle corrélation s'observe également entre la fréquence des menaces et celle des flexions de gaster lorsque ces dernières sont suffisamment nombreuses.

    La motivation agressive de certains de ces comportements a été analysée.

  4. 4.

    Nous avons comparé le comportement agonistique deM. rubra à celui deF. fusca (d'après les données deWallis). Quoique quelques différences soient apparues, dans l'ensemble les deux espèces ont un répertoire agonistique fort semblable.

  5. 5.

    Nous avons également observé le comportement de l'intruse: fuite, comportements d'apaisement, attaque, et nous discutons de leur efficacité respective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum (M. S.), 1969. — Alarm Pheromones.Ann. Rev. Entomol., 14, 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum (M. S.) andBrand (J. M.), 1972. — Social Insect pheromones: their chemistry and function.Am. Zool., 12, 553–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum (M. S.), Warter (S. L.) andTraynham (J. G.), 1966. — Chemical releasers of social behaviour. VI. The relation of structure to activity of ketones as releasers of alarm forIridomyrmex pruinosus.J. Ins. Physiol., 12, 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brian (M. V.), 1952a. — The structure of a dense natural ant population.J. Anim. Ecology, 21, 12–24.—Brian (M. V.), 1952b. Interactions between ant colonies at an artificial nest site.Ent. Magaz., 88, 84–88.—Brian (M. V.), 1956. Natural density ofMyrmica rubra in West Scotland.Ins. Soc., 3, 473–487.—Brian (M. V.), 1973. Caste control through worker attack in the antMyrmica. Ins. Soc., 20, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian (M. V.), Hibble (J.) andStradling (D. J.), 1965. — Ant pattern and density in a Southern English heath.J. Anim. Ecol., 34, 545–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian (M. V.), Hibble (J.) andKelly (A. F.), 1966. — The dispersion of ant species in a southern English heath.J. Anim. Ecol., 35, 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammaerts-Tricot (M. C.), 1973. — Phéromones agrégeant les ouvrières deMyrmica rubra.J. Ins. Physiol., 19, 1299–1315.—Cammaerts-Tricot (M. C.), 1974. Piste et phéromone attractive chez la fourmiMyrmica rubra. J. Comp. Physiol., 88, 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange (R.), 1960. — Ueber die Futterweitergabe zwischen Angehörigen verschiedener Waldameisenstaaten.Zeitschr. f. Tierpsychologie, 17, 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law (J. H.) andRegnier (F.), 1971. — Pheromones.Ann. Rev. Biochem., 40, 533–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux (G.), 1976. — Les émissions de stridulation chezMyrmica laevinodis. Paper presented at the meeting of the French section of the IUSSI (Tours, March 1976).

  • Leuthold (R. H.) andSchlunegger (U.), 1973. — The alarm behaviour from the mandibular gland secretion in the antCrematogaster scutellaris.Ins. Soc., 20, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfqvist (J.), 1976. — Formic acid and saturated hydrocarbons as alarm pheromones for the antFormica rufa.J. Ins. Physiol., 22, 1331–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malicky (H.), 1970. — Unterschiede im Angriffsverhalten vonFormica-Arten gegenüber Lycaenidenraupen.Ins. Soc., 17, 121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning (A.), 1967. — An Introduction to Animal Behaviour. Arnold, Publ., London, 208 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markl (H.), 1973. — The evolution of stridulatory communication in ants.Proc. of the VIIth Intern. Congress of IUSSI (London, 10–15 Sept. 1975).

  • Maschwitz (U.), 1964. — Gefahrenalarmstoffe und Gefahrenalarmierung bei sozialen Hymenopteren.Zeitsch. f. vergl. Physiol., 47, 596–655.—Maschwitz (U.), 1975. Old and new chemical weapons in ants.Proc. Symp. IUSSI (Dijon, Sept. 1975), 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möglich (M.) andHölldobler (B.), 1974. — Social carrying behaviour and division of labor during nest moving in ants.Psyche, 81, 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe (R. M.) andBlum (M. S.), 1970. — Alarm pheromones in the genusMyrmica, Their composition and species specificity.Z. vergl. Physiol., 70, 363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn (G. J.) andMabelis (A.), 1972. — Predation and aggression as possible regulatory mechanisms inFormica.Ekologia Polska, 20, 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrzanski (J.), 1966. — Contribution to the ethology ofLeptothorax acervorum.Acta Biol. Exper. (Warsaw), 26, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrzanska (J.) andDobrzanski (J.), 1962. — Quelques observations sur les luttes entre différentes espèces de fourmis.Acta Biologiae Experimentalis, vol.22, 269–277.—Dobrzanska (J.) andDobrzanski (J.), 1975. Ethological studies in the antTetramorium caespitum Mayr. II. Interspecific relationships.Acta neurobiol. exper., 35, 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes (G. W.), 1971. — An experimental study on the distribution of heathland ants.J. Anim. Ecol., 40, 495–499.—Elmes (G. W.), 1974. The spatial distribution of two ant species living in limestone grassland.Pedobiologia, Bd. 14, 412–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde (R. A.), 1970. — Animal Behaviour. A Synthesis of Ethology and Comparative Psychology (2nd edition).Mac Graw Hill Kogakusha Ltd., édit., 876 p.

  • Hölldobler (K.), 1937. — Ueber die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der roten Knotenameise,Myrmica rubra laevinodis Nyl.Z. angew. Entomol., 24, 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler (B.), 1976. — Recruitment behaviour, home range orientation and territoriality in Harvester Ants(Pogonomyrmex).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1, 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagner (H.), 1966. — Le mécanisme et les conséquences des comportements trophallactiques chez les Guêpes du genreVespa.Bull. Biol. Fr. et Belg., 100, 189–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser (J. C.), Brownlee (R. C.) andSilverstein (R.), 1968. — Alarm pheromones of the antAtta texana.J. Ins. Physiol., 14, 529–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oinonen (E. A.), 1956. — Kallioiden muurhaisista ja niiden osundesta kallioiden metsittymiseen Etelä. Suomessa. On the ants of the rocks and their contribution to the afforestation of rocks in southern Finland.Acta Entomologica Fennica Julkaissut, Edidit Suomen Hyönteistieteellinen Seura, Societas Entomologica Fennica, 12.

  • Pasteels (J. M.), 1975. — Some aspects of the behavioural methodology in the study of social insects pheromones.Pheromones and Defensive Secretions in Social Insects. Proc. Symp. IUSSI (Dijon, France), 105–121.

  • Petal (J.), 1974. — Analysis of a sheep pasture ecosystem in the Pienninny Mountains (The Carpathians). XV. The effects of pasture management on ant population.Ekologia Polska, 22, 679–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontin (A. J.), 1961. — Population stabilization and competition between the antsL. flavus andL. niger.J. Animal Ecology, 30, 47–54.—Pontin (A. J.), 1963. Further consideration of competition and the ecology of the antsL. flavus andL. niger. J. Anim. Ecology, 32, 565–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnier (F. E.) andWilson (E. O.), 1968. — The alarm-defence system ofAcanthomyops claviger.J. Insect Physiol., 14, 955–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson (Ph. L.), 1971. — Pheromones involved in aggressive behaviour in the antMyrmecia gulosa.J. Ins. Physiol., 17, 691–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren (R.), 1969. — Notes regarding the growth of a polycalic nest system inFormica uralensis Ruzsky.Not. Entomol., 49, 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel (S.), 1956. — Non parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences.Mac Graw Hill Kogakusha Ltd Publ., 312 p.

  • Stebaev (I. V.) andReznikova (J. I.), 1972. — Two interaction types of ants living in steppe ecosystems in South Siberia, USSR.Ekologia Polska, 20, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudd (J. H.), 1967. — An introduction to the behaviour of ants. Arnold, Publ., Ltd., London, 200 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricot (M. C.), Pasteels (J. M.) andTursch (B.), 1972. — Phéromones stimulant l'agressivité chezMyrmica rubra.J. Ins. Physiol., 18, 449–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis (D. I.), 1962a. — Behaviour patterns of the antFormica fusca.Anim. Behav., 10, 105–111.—Wallis (D. I.), 1962b. Aggressive behaviour in the antFormica fusca. Anim. Behav., 10, 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler (J. W.) andBlum (M. S.), 1973. — Alkylpyrazine alarm pheromones in Ponerine Ants.Science, 182, 501–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson (E. O.), 1958. — A chemical releaser of alarm and digging behaviour in the antPogonomyrmex badius.Psyche, 65, 41–51.—Wilson (E. O.), 1971. The Insect Societies.The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), 548 p.—Wilson (E. O.), 1976. The organization of colony defense in the antPheidole dentata Mayr.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1, 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuorenrinne (H.), 1958. — Muurhaisten lajienvälisistä suhteista. Ueber die gegenseitige Beziehungen der Ameisenarten. In Finnish, German Summary.Annales Entomol. Fenn., 24, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Vroey, C., Pasteels, J.M. Agonistic behaviour ofMyrmica rubra L.. Ins. Soc 25, 247–265 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224745

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224745

Keywords

Navigation