Skip to main content
Log in

Response ofSetaria italica to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense as compared toAzotobacter chroococcum

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Under controlled conditions in pots filled with sand, vermiculite and field soil, inoculation withA. brasilense-Cd ATCC 29729 or withAzotobacter chroococcum caused increases above controls in the weight and N content of panicles ofSetaria italica. In no case, however, did N increases in test plants exceed the initial total N content. High acetylene reduction activities (1,000–2,000 nmole/h/pot) could be found only in plants inoculated withAzospirillum. Inoculation withAzospirillum (strain-Cd) in the field caused a significant increase above noninoculated controls of 18.5% in shoot dry weight, ofSetaria italica. Azotobacter caused a non significant increase of 8%. No significant differences were found between yields ofSetaria italica grown in soil inoculated withA. chroococcum, and those of plants grown in the presence ofA. vinelandii. A. brasilense-Cd was more effective in the field thanA. brasilense Sp-7 ATCC 29145. The results suggest that Azospirillum may increase yields ofS. italica more efficiently than Azotobacter under local field conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecht S L, Okon Y and Burris R H 1977 Effect of light and temperature on the association betweenZea mays andSpirillum lipoferum. Plant Physiol. 60, 528–531.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berkum P van and Bohlool B B 1980 Evaluation of nitrogen fixation by bacteria in association with roots of tropical grasses. Microbiol. Rev. 44, 491–517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown M E 1982In Bacteria and Plants. Eds. M E Rhodes-Roberts and F A Skinner. Academic Press, London, pp 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen E, Okon Y, Kigel J, Nur I and Henis Y 1980 Increases in dry weight and total nitrogen content inZea mays andSetaria italica associated with nitrogen fixing Azospirillum spp. Plant Physiol. 66, 746–749.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dart P J and Day J M 1975 Non-symbiotic nitrogen fixation in soil.In Soil Microbiology Ed. N Walker. Butterworths London pp. 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy R W F, Burns R C and Holsten R D 1973 Applications of acetylene-ethylene assay for measurement of nitrogen fixation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5, 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hiller A, Plazin J and Von Slyke D D 1948 A study of condition kjeldahl determination of nitrogen in proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 176, 1401–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen H L 1965 Non-symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Agronomy 10, 436–480.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kapulnik Y, Okon Y, Kigel J, Nur I and Henis Y 1981 Effects of temperature, nitrogen fertilization and plant age on nitrogen fixation bySetaria italica inoculated withAzospirillum brasilense (strain Cd). Plant Physiol. 68, 340–343.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kapulnik Y, Sarig S, Nur I and Okon Y 1983 Effect ofAzospirillum inoculation on yield of field grown wheat. Can. J. Microbiol. 29, 895–944.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kapulnik Y, Sarig S, Nur I, Okon Y, Kigel J and Henis Y 1981 Yield increases in summer cereal crops of Israeli fields inoculated with Azospirillum. Exp. Agric. 17, 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin W, Okon Y and Hardy R W F 1983 Enhanced mineral uptake byZea mays andSorghum bicolor roots inoculated withAzospirillum brasilense. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 1775–1779.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nur I, Okon Y and Henis Y 1980 An increase in nitrogen content ofSetaria italica andZea mays inoculated with Azospirillum. Can. J. Microbiol. 26, 482–485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Okon Y, 1984 Response of cereal and forage grasses to inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria.In Advances in Nitrogen Fixation Research. Eds. C Veeger and W E Newton. Martinus Nijhoff, Dr W. Junk/Pudoc Publishers The Hague. Wageningen. pp 303–309.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Okon Y, Albrecht S L and Burris R H 1977 Methods for growingSpirillum lipoferum and for counting it in pure culture and in association with plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33, 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Okon Y, Heytler P G and Hardy R W F 1983 N2 fixation byAzospirillum brasilense and its incorporation into hostSetaria italica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46, 694–697.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patriquin D G, Döbereiner J and Jain D K 1983 Sites and processes of association between diazotrophs and grasses. Can. J. Microbiol. 29, 900–915.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sarig S, Kapulnik Y, Nur I and Okon Y 1984 Response of non-irrigatedSorghum bicolor toAzospirillum inoculation. Expl. Agric. 20, 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tarrand J J, Krieg N R and Döbereiner J 1978 A taxonomic study of theSpirillum lipoferum group, with description of a new genusAzospirillum gen. nov. and two species,Azospirillum lipoferum (Beijerinck) comb. nov. andAzospirillum brasilense sp. nov. Can. J. Microbiol. 24, 967–980.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Watanabe F S and Olsen R S 1965 Test of an ascorbic method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29, 677–678.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yahalom, E., Kapulnik, Y. & Okon, Y. Response ofSetaria italica to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense as compared toAzotobacter chroococcum . Plant Soil 82, 77–85 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220772

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220772

Key words

Navigation