Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of hospital ethics committee success

  • Article
  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In December 1990, an empirical study assessing hospital ethics committee (HEC) success was completed. Success was measured in terms of the number of interventions undertaken by the committees in four functional areas: education, guidelines development, prospective and retrospective case review. Some commonly quoted success determinants, such as multidisciplinarity, physician chairpersons, and a high institutional status of the chairperson were found not to foster success; the latter two, actually decreased committee success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scheirton LS.The relationship between ethics committee success and the training and status of the chairperson in university teaching hospitals. Dissertation Abstracts International. Publication Number: AAC6116973; 1990.

  2. LevineC. Questions and (some very tentative) answers about hospital ethics committees.Hastings Center Report. 1984; 14(3): 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MozdzierzGJ, ReiquamCW, SmithLC. Shaping access to hospital ethics committees: Some critical issues.HEC Forum. 1989; 1(1): 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. United States Department of Health and Human Services: Office of Human Development Services. Child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment program; final rule; [and] Model guidelines for health care providers to establish Infant Care Review Committees; notice.Federal Register, 1985; 50: 14878–901.

    Google Scholar 

  5. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: A report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. RuesLA, WeaverB. Membership issues for hospital ethics committees.HEC Forum. 1989; 1(3): 127–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. RossJW, BayleyC, MichelV, PughD.Handbook for hospital ethics committees. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. LoB. Behind closed doors: Promises and pitfalls of ethics committees.New England Journal of Medicine. 1987; 317: 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Monagle JF. Blueprints for hospital ethics committees.CHA (California Hospital Association) Insight. 1984; 1–4.

  10. YoungMG. Hospital ethics committees.Texas Medicine. 1986; 82(4): 72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. BeckmannMJ, KrelleW. (eds.)Tinbergen lectures on organization theory. 2nd ed., Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer Verlag; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GregoryDR. Consensus—Real or Imaginary?.The Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1990; 1(1): 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  13. GetzelsJW, GubaEG. Social behavior and the administrative process.School Review. 1957; 65: 423–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. HosfordB.Bioethics committees: The health care providers's guide. Rockville, MD.: Aspen Systems Corporation; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. BlaineGB. Ethicists in the hospital [letter].New England Journal of Medicine, 1985; 312(3): 188.

    Google Scholar 

  16. NiemiraDA. Grassroots grappling: Ethics committees at rural hospitals.Annals of Internal Medicine. 1988; 109: 981–83.

    Google Scholar 

  17. NiemiraDA, OrrRD, CulverCM. Ethics committees in small hospitals.Journal of Rural Health. 1989; 5: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. PerrowC. Hospitals: Technology, structure and goals. In J.G.March (ed.),Handbook of organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1965, pp. 910–71.

    Google Scholar 

  19. FreidsonE.Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York, NY: Harper and Row; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ParsonsT.The social system. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  21. GetzelsJW, ThelenJW. The classroom group as a unique social system. In N.B.Henry (ed.),The dynamics of instructional groups (Fifty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II) (pp. 53–82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  22. SieglerM. Ethics committees: Decisions by bureaucracy.Hastings Center Report. 1986; 16(3): 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheirton, L.S. Determinants of hospital ethics committee success. HEC Forum 4, 342–359 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217981

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217981

Key words

Navigation