Skip to main content
Log in

Blood flow and mucoid cap protect against penetration of carcinogens into superficially injured gastric mucosa of rats

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we tested the influence of blood flow and the mucoid cap on the penetration of carcinogens to the proliferative cells in the injured rat gastric mucosa. Ten minutes after mucosal exposure to 4.5 mol/liter NaCl,N-[3H]methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine was instilled intragastrically. Hypertonic saline caused superficial mucosal damage, formation of a mucoid cap, high gastric mucosal blood flow, and a large flux of fluid into the gastric lumen. The mean percentage of S-phase cells labeled with carcinogen (the cell population at risk forN-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced carcinogenesis) in the antrum and corpus was 0.2 and 0.2, respectively, in the injury control group, 10.1 and 2.0 after removal of the mucoid cap, 1.5 and 9.8 after celiac artery ligation, and 28.2 and 21.9 after removal of the mucoid cap and celiac artery ligation. These results show that both the mucoid cap and gastric mucosal blood flow protect against penetration of carcinogens into the superficially injured gastric mucosa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen A, Flemstrom G, Garner A, Kivilaakso E: Gastroduodenal mucosal protection. Physiol Rev 73:823–857, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  2. Svanes K, Gislason H, Guttu K, Herfjord JK, Fevang J, Grønbech JE: Role of blood flow in adaptive protection of the cat gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 100:1249–1258, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  3. Endoh K, Kauffman GL, Leung FW: Mechanism of aggravation of mucosal injury by intravenous nicotine in rat stomach. Am J Physiol 261:G1037-G1042, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grønbech JE, Matre K, Stangeland L, Svanes K, Varhaug JE: Gastric mucosal repair in the cat: Role of the hyperemic response to mucosal damage. Gastroenterology 95:311–320 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert A, Nezamis JE, Lancaster C, Davis JP, Field SO, Hanchar AJ: Mild irritants prevent gastric necrosis through “adaptive cytoprotection” mediated by prostaglandins. Am J Physiol 245:G113-G121, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frydman GM, Penney AG, Malcontenti C, O'Brien PE: Inability of cytoprotection to occur during a period of gastric ischemia. Dig Dis Sci 36:1353–1360, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith GS, Myers SI, Bartula LL, Miller TA: Adaptive cytoprotection against alcohol injury in the rat stomach is not due to increased prostanoid synthesis. Prostaglandins 41:207–223 1991

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davenport HW: Fluid produced by the gastric mucosa during damage by acetic and salicylic acids. Gastroenterology 50:487–499, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  9. Szabo S, Trier JS, Brown A, Schnoor J: Early vascular injury and increased vascular permeability in gastric mucosal injury caused by ethanol in the rat. Gastroenterology 88:228–236 1985

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lacy ER: Gastric mucosal resistance to a repeated ethanol insult. Scand J Gastroenterol 20(suppl 110):63–72, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  11. Balaa MA, Turnage C: Gastric contents retained in rat stomach following mild irritant exposure contribute to adaptive cytoprotection. Dig Dis Sci 35:1328–1333, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cho CH, Ogle CW: Modulatory action of adenosine on gastric function and ethanol-induced mucosal damage in rats. Dig Dis Sci 35:1334–1339, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pihan G, Szabo S: Protection of gastric mucosa against hypertonic sodium chloride by 16,16-dimethy prostaglandin E2 or sodium thiosulfate in the rat. Dig Dis Sci 34:1865–1872, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morris GP, Wallace JL: The roles of ethanol and of acid in the production of gastric mucosal erosions in rats. Circhows Arch B 38:23–38, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sellers LA, Allen A, Bennett MK: Formation of a fibrin based gelatinous coat over repairing rat gastric epithelim after acute ethanol damage: Interaction with adherent mucus. Gut 28:835–843, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wallace JL, Whittle BJR: Role of mucus in the repair of gastric epithelial damage in the rat. Gastroenterology 91:603–611 1986

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wallace JL, Whittle BJR: The role of extracellular mucus as a protective cap over gastric mucosal damage. Scand J Gastroenterol 21(suppl 125):79–84, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wallace JL: Increased resistance of the rat gastric mucosa to hemorrhagic damage after exposure to an irritant. Gastroenterology 94:22–32, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wallace JL, McKnight GW: The mucoid cap over superficial gastric damage in the rat. Gastroenterology 99:295–304, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ohgaki H, Tomihara M, Sato S, Kleihues P, Sugimura T: Differential proliferative response of gastric mucosa during carcinogenesis induced byN-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in susceptible ACI rats, resistant Buffalo rats, and their nybrid F1 cross. Cancer Res 48:5275–5279, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sørbye H, Kvinnsland S, Svanes K: Penetration ofN-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine to proliferative cells in gastric mucosa of rats is different in polyrus and fundus and depends on exposure time and solvent. Carcinogenesis 14:887–892, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sørbye H, Kvinnsland S, Svanes K: Effect of salt-induced damage and healing on penetration ofN-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine to proliferative cells in the gastric mucosa of rats. Carcinogenesis 15:673–674, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sørbye H, Guttu K, Gislason H, Grong K, Svanes K: Gastric mucosal injury and associated changes in mucosal blood flow and gastric fluid secretion caused by dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in rats. Dig Dis Sci 38:1243–1250, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heymann MA, Payne BD, Hoffmann JIE, Rudolph AM: Blood flow measurements with radionuclide-labeled particiles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 20:55–79, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  25. Segadal L, Svanes K: Evaluation of the mikcrosphere method for determination of cardiac output. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 39:415–421, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  26. Allen A, Leonard AJ, Pearson JP, Sellers LA, Bennett MK: Pepsin induced mucosal damage compared to that with ethanol or hypertonic saline.In Mechanisms of Injury, Protection and Repair of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. A Garner, PE O'Brien (eds). Chichester, Wiley, 1991, pp 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cepinskas G, Specian RD, Kvietys PR: Adaptive cytoprotection in the small intestine: Role of mucus. Am J Physiol 264:G921-G927, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cepinskas G, Specian RD, Kvietys PR: Mucin offers protection against intestinal epithelial injury induced by oleic acid and ethanol. Gastroenterology 102:A48, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tatematsu M, Takahashi M, Hananouchi M, Shirai T, Hirose M, Fukushima S, Ito N: Protective effect of mucin on experimental gastric cancer induced byN-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine plus sodium chloride in rats. Gann 67:223–229, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gislason H, Herfjord JK, Guttu K, Grong K, Grønbech JE, Ulvik R, Svanes K: Adaptive protection related to clearance of ethanol in gastric mucosa of cats. Scand J Gastroenterol 28:361–368, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sipponen P: Gastric cancer—a long-term consequence ofHelicobacter pylori infection? Scand J Gastroenterol 29(suppl 201):24–27, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dixon MF: Pathophysiology ofHelicobacter pylori infection. Scand J Gastroenterol 29(suppl 201):7–10, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  33. Micots I, Augeron C, Laboisse CL, Muzeau F, Megraud F: Mucin exocytosis: A major target forHelicobacter pylori. J Clin Pathol 46:241–245, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  34. Molinari F, Parodi MC, DeAngelis P, Cheli R: Gastric mucus secretion in chronic gastritis. Scand J Gastroenterol 19(suppl 92):167–171, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kurumado K, Yamakawa T, Ohara T: Changes in arterioles of the human gastric mucosa with atrophic gastritis. Hepatogastroenterology 37:235–238, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tanaguchi Y, Kimura K, Yoshida Y, Seki M, Kumakura Y, Satoh K, Kihira K, Ido K, Mato M: Age-related changes in the micovessels of the human stomach: an ultrastructural study. J Clin Gastroenterol 17(suppl 1):S92-S98, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  37. Guslandi N, Sorghi M, Foppa L, Tittobello A: Congestive gastropathy versus chronic gastritis: A comparison of some pathophysiological aspects. Digestion 54:160–162, 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grants from the Norwegian Cancer Society and Helga Sembs fond. Dr Sørbye is a Research Fellow of the Norwegian Cancer Society.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sørbyae, H., Øvrebø, K., Gislason, H. et al. Blood flow and mucoid cap protect against penetration of carcinogens into superficially injured gastric mucosa of rats. Digest Dis Sci 40, 1720–1728 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212693

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212693

Key Words

Navigation