Skip to main content
Log in

Assumptions underlying quantitative and qualitative research: Implications for institutional research

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For institutional researchers, the choice to use a quantitative or qualitative approach to research is dictated by time, money, resources, and staff. Frequently, the choice to use one or the other approach is made at the method level. Choices made at this level generally have rigor, but ignore the underlying philosophical assumptions structuring beliefs about methodology, knowledge, and reality. When choosing a method, institutional researchers also choose what they believe to be knowledge, reality, and the correct method to measure both. The purpose of this paper is to clarify and explore the assumptions underlying quantitative and qualitative research. The reason for highlighting the assumptions is to increase the general level of understanding and appreciation of epistemological issues in institutional research. Articulation of these assumptions should foster greater awareness of the appropriateness of different kinds of knowledge for different purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allender, J. S. (1986). Educational research: A personal and social process.Review of Educational Research 56(2): 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. A. (1988).Multiethnic Education, 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992).Intimations of Postmodernity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1976).The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1983).Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, T. R. (1988). Applying regression analysis to problems in institutional research. In B. D. Yancey (ed.),Applying Statistics in Institutional Research, 43–60. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunda, M. A. (1991). Capturing the richness of student outcomes with qualitative techniques. In D. M. Fetterman (ed.),Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Research, pp. 35–47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cziko, G. A. (1989). Unpredictability and indeterminism in human behavior: Arguments and implications for educational research.Educational Researcher 18(3): 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darder, A. (1991).Culture and Power in the Classroom. A Critical Foundation for Bi-cultural Education. New York: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1971). The logic of naturalistic inquiry.Social Forces 50: 166–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln (1994) (eds.).Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933).How We Think. Massachusetts: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1990). The rise of hermeneutics. In G. L. Ormiston and A. D. Schrift (eds.),The Hermeneutic Tradition. From Ast to Ricoeur (pp. 101–114). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmoyer, R. (1985). The rescue from relativism: Two failed attempts and an alternative strategy.Educational Researcher 14(10): 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1981). On the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to qualitative research.Educational Researcher 10(4): 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1983). Anastasia might still be alive, but the monarchy is dead.Educational Researcher 12(5): 13–14, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M. (1991). Qualitative resource landmarks. In D. M. Fetterman (ed.),Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Research, pp. 81–84. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. (1985). The art and science of institutional research. In M. W. Peterson and M. Corcoran (eds.),Institutional Research in Transition, pp. 17–37. New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A. (1987). Meaning in method: The rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research.Educational Researcher 16(7): 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research.Educational Researcher 22(4): 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. (1984).A Dictionary of Philosophy. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. W. (1986). Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science.Educational Researcher 15(9): 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973).The interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giarelli, J. M., and Chambliss, J. J. (1988). Philosophy of education as qualitative inquiry. In R. R. Sherman and R. B. Webb (eds.),Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods, pp. 30–43. New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1988).Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life. Critical Pedagogy in the Modern Age. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1991) (ed.).Postmodernism, Feminism, and Cultural Politics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, E. W., F. Miller, and D. Rollock (1990). Coping with communicentric bias in knowledge production in the social sciences.Educational Researcher 19(3): 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. M. (1993).The Struggle for Pedagogies. Critical and Feminist Discourses as Regimes of Truth. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. (1987). What have we learned about naturalistic evaluation?Evaluation Practice 8(1): 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., and Y. Lincoln (1981).Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D. M. Fetterman (ed.),Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution, pp. 89–115. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. (1988).Analyzing Field Reality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971).Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988).On the Logic of the Social Sciences (S. W. Nicholsen and J. A. Stark, trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976).Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriott, R. E., and W. A. Firestone (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability.Educational Researcher 12(2): 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyl, J. D. (1975). Paradigms in social science.Society 12(5): 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, D. E., G. W. McLaughlin, and J. T. Austin (1988). Using log-linear models in higher education research. In B. D. Yancey (ed.),Applying statistics in Institutional Research, pp. 23–42. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K. R. (1985). Two dogmas of educational research.Educational Researcher 14(8): 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard.Educational Researcher 17(8): 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, S. A. (1988). Educational and grounded theory. In R. R. Sherman and R. B. Webb (eds.),Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods, pp. 123–140. New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, E. (1988). Clarifying qualitative research: A focus on traditions.Educational Researcher (17(1): 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1918).The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, L. W., and D. M. Young (1988). Forecasting methods for institutional research. In B. D. Yancey (ed.),Applying Statistics in Institutional Research, pp. 77–96. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1964).The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, T. (1991). On the very idea of a discourse community.College Composition and Communication 42(4): 425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J., and M. L. Miller (1986).Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962).The structure of Scientific Revolutions. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. Reprinted inThe Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding.Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 14(2): 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancy, D. (1993).Qualitative Research in Education. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. 1991a).Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy Within the Post-modern. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991b). Deconstructing/deconstructive inquiry: The politics of knowing and being known.Educational Theory 41(2): 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951).Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba (1985).Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., Y. S. Lincoln, and A. E. Austin (1991). Integrating a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the quality of academic life: Political and logistical issues. In D. M. Fetterman (ed.),Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Research, pp. 65–80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988).The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. InVarieties of Political Expression in Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft.Educational Researcher 13(5): 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1986).Research Interviewing. Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. A. (1990, April).Multiple Triangulation in Impact Assessment: Setting the Context. Remarks prepared for oral presentation in P. LeMahieu (Chair), Multiple triangulation in impact assessment: The Pittsburgh discussion project experience. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, Boston, Massachusetts.

  • Packer, M. J., and R. B. Addison (1989). Introduction. In M. J. Packer and R. B. Addison (eds.),Entering the Circle: Hermeneutic Investigation in Psychology, pp. 13–36. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1980).Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. W. (1985a). Emerging developments in postsecondary organization theory and research: Fragmentation or integration.Educational Researcher 14(3): 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. W. (1985b). Institutional research: An evolutionary perspective. In M. W. Peterson and M. Corcoran (eds.),Institutional Research in Transition, pp. 5–15. New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 46. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. W., and M. G. Spencer (1993). Qualitative and quantitative approaches to academic culture: Do they tell us the same thing?Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. IX, pp. 344–388. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (1983). After the wake: Postpositivistic educational thought.Educational Researcher 12(5); 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K. L. (1967).Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P., and W. M. Sullivan (1987). The interpretive turn: A second look. In P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan (eds.),Interpretive Social Science. A Second Look, pp. 1–30. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1951).Client-Centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, P. M. (1992).Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., and B. L. Wilson (1985). Numbers and words. Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study.Evaluation Review 9(5): 627–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runes, D. D. (1983).Dictionary of Philosophy. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. (1967).The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R. R., and R. B. Webb (1988). Qualitative research in education: A focus. In R. R. Sherman and R. B. Webb (eds.),Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods, pp. 2–21. New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1981). Disciplines of inquiry in education: An overview.Educational Researcher 10(6): 5–12, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. K. (1983a). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue.Educational Researcher 12(3): 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. K. (1983b). Quantitative versus interpretive: The problem of conducting social inquiry. In E. House (ed.),Philosophy of Evaluation, pp. 27–52. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. K. (1984). The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 6(4): 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. K., and L. Heshusius (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers.Educational Researcher 15(1): 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J. F. (1984). On the nature of educational research.Educational Researcher 13(10: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield, J. H. (1985). The ethnocentric basis of social science knowledge production. In E. W. Gorden (ed.),Review of Research in Education, vol. 12, pp. 387–415. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1987). Interpretation and the science of man. In P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan (eds.),Interpretive Social Science. A Second Look, pp. 33–81. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1991). Utilizing ethnographic interviews to enhance academic decision making. In D. M. Fetterman (ed.),Using Qualitative Methods in Institutional Research, pp. 7–22. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmson, J. O., and J. Ree (1989) (eds.).The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy and Philosophies. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, B. D. (1988a). Exploratory data analysis methods for institutional researchers. In B. D. Yancey (ed.),Applying Statistics in Institutional Research, pp. 97–110. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, B. D. (1988b). Institutional research and the classical experimental paradigm. In B. D. Yancey (ed.),Applying Statistics in Institutional Research, pp. 5–10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hathaway, R.S. Assumptions underlying quantitative and qualitative research: Implications for institutional research. Res High Educ 36, 535–562 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208830

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02208830

Keywords

Navigation