Skip to main content
Log in

A contribution to the natural history of breast cancer

V. Bilateral primary breast cancer: Incidence, risks and diagnosis of simultaneous primary cancer in the opposite breast

  • Published:
Archives of gynecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Tissue from contralateral breast was taken from 505 patients with invasive breast cancer. Every 5th patient had simultaneous carcinom in the opposite breast, 7.7% (39/505) had invasive cancer, and 13.1% (66/505) had carcinoma in situ.

Invasive cancers in the opposite breast were diagnosed at an earlier stage as compared with the neoplasm of the primary breast. However, 26% of the patients already had positive axillary nodes. The following risk indicators of the bilateral disease were found: age at time of diagnosis, histologic type of tumours, familial breast cancer, suspicious mammography, P2/DY-breast parenchymal pattern (Wolfe) and multicentric cancer of primary breast. Our findings support the proposal to consider bilaterality of breast cancer as a sign of systemic disease of the breasts, involving the ductal and lobular system within eight quadrants of a paired organ (Ober).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beahrs OH, Shapiro S, Smart C (1979) Report of the working group to review the national cancer institute — American cancer society. Breast cancer detection demonstration projects. J Nat Cancer Inst 62:640–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudary MA, Millis RR, Hoskins EOL, Halder M, Bulbrook RD, Cuzick J, Hayward JL (1984) Bilateral primary breast cancer: a prospective study of disease incidence. Br J Surg 71:711–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher ER, Fisher B, Sass R, Wickerham L et al. (1984) Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project (Protocol No. 4). Cancer 54: 3002–3011

    Google Scholar 

  • Leis HP (1980) Managing the remaining breast. Cancer 46:1026–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser ML, Rosen PP, Kinne DW (1982) Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive breast carcinoma. Surgery 91:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober KG (1982) The opposite breast — a model that may help us to understand breast cancer. Clinics Oncol 1:401–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen PP, Senie R, Schottenfeld D, Ashikari R (1979) Noninvasive breast carcinoma. Frequency of unsuspected invasion and implications for treatment. Ann Surg 189:377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulusan AH, Egger H, Schneider ML, Willgeroth F (1982) A contribution to the natural history of breast cancer. IV. Lobular carcinoma in situ and its relation to breast cancer. Arch Gynecol 231:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban JA (1970) Bilateral breast cancer. Breast cancer: early and late. Year Book Medical Publ Inc, Chicago, pp 262–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban JA, Papachristou D, Taylor J (1977) Bilateral breast cancer — biopsy of the opposite breast. Cancer 40:1968–1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban JA (1985) Bilateral breast cancer revealed by biopsy of the opposite breast. In: Zander J, Baltzer J (eds) Early breast cancer. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi U, Zucali R, Luini A, Belli F, Crispino S, Merson M (1985) Conservative treatment of breast cancer with the “QU.A.RT.” Technique. In: Zander J, Baltzer J (eds) Early breast cancer. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 264–270

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. K. G. Ober on his 70th birthday. His personal support and professional acumen has made this investigation possible

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tulusan, A.H., Ronay, G., Egger, H. et al. A contribution to the natural history of breast cancer. Arch. Gynecol. 237, 85–91 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199712

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199712

Key words

Navigation