Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on tree legumes

III. Characterization of the symbionts and direct and reciprocal cross inoculation studies with tree legumes and cultivated legumes

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fortytwo isolates of root nodule bacteria obtained from 19 tree legumes were studied for their morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics. All the isolates grew well at 0.8–1.8 per cent sodium chloride concentration. Optimum temperature range for the isolates was found to be 35°–40°C.

Strains of Rhizobium, specific toVigna radiata var.aureus (Syn.Phaseolus aureus) green gram andVigna radiata var.mungo (Syn.Phaseolus mungo) black gram, were found to be selective in nodulating the tree legumes. Isolates from tree legumes maintained their infectivity after plant passage through green gram and black gram. All the six rhizobial isolates from tree legumes, when tried on green gram and black gram, were found to be superior to the uninoculated control and in some cases performed better than the specific rhizobia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen, O. N. and Allen, E. K. 1936 Root nodule bacteria of some tropical leguminous plants I. Cross inoculation studies withVigna sinensis. Soil Sci.42, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, O. N. and Allen, E. K. 1939 Root nodule bacteria of some tropical leguminous plants II. Cross inoculation test with cowpea group. Soil Sci.47, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basak, M. K. and Goyal, S. K. 1975 Studies on tree legumes. I. Nodulation pattern and characterization of the symbiont. Ann. Arid Zone14, 367.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basak, M. K. and Goyal, S. K. 1980 Studies on tree legumes II. Further additions to the list of nodulating tree legumes. Plant and Soil55, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bisset, K. A. 1959 Some characters of Rhizobium strains from tropical legumes. J. Gen. Microbiol.20, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowen, G. D. 1956 Nodulation of legumes indigenous to Queensland. Queensland J. Agric. Sci.13, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll, W. R. 1934 A study ofRhizobium species in relation to nodule formation on the roots of Florida legumes I. Soil Sci.37, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conklin, M. E. 1936 Studies on root nodule organisms of certain wild legumes. Soil Sci.41, 167.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fred, E. B., Baldwin, I. L. and McCoy, E. 1932 Root nodule bacteria and leguminous plants. Univ. Wis. Press, Madison, 118 p.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson, A. H. 1961 Root temperature and nitrogen fixation. Nature London191, 1081.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graham, P. H. and Parker, C. A. 1964 Diagnostic features in the root nodule bacteria of legumes. Plant and Soil20, 383.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Habish, H. A. and Khairi, A. M. 1968 Nodulation of legumes in the Sudan: Cross inoculation groups and the associatedRhizobium strains. Exp. Agric.4, 227.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Habish, H. A. and Khairi, A. M. 1970 Nodulation of legumes in Sudan II:Rhizobium strains and cross inoculation ofAcacia spp. Exp. Agric.6, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hofer, A. M. 1935 Methods of distinguishing between legume bacteria and their common contaminant. J. Am. Soc. Agron.27, 228.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hofer, A. W. 1941 A characterisation ofBacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and Van Delden) Lohnis. J. Bacteriol.41, 193.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koser, S. A. 1923 Utilization of the salts of organic acids by the colonaerogenes groups. J. Bacteriol.8, 493.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lange, R. T. 1961 Nodule bacteria associated with the indigenous leguminosae of South Western Australia. J. Gen. Microbiol.26, 351.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lange, R. T. 1962 Susceptibility of indigenous South West Australian legumes to infection byRhizobium. Plant and Soil17, 134.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKnight, T. 1949 Efficiency of isolates ofRhizobium in the cowpea group, with proposed additions to the group. Q. J. Agric. Sci.6, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer, D. R. and Anderson, A. J. 1959 Temperature and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Nature, London183, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norris, D. O. 1965 Acid production byRhizobium. A unifying concept. Plant and Soil22, 143.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pillai, R. N. and Sen, A. 1973 Salt tolerance ofRhizobium fromDolichos labalb. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektion Kr. Hyg. II.128, 538.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, N. R., Cordon, R. E. and Clark, F. E. 1952 Aerobic spore forming bacteria. U. S. Dep. Agric. Monograph No.16, Washington.

  24. Subba Rao, N. S., Lakshmi Kumari, M., Singh, C. S. and Magu, S. P. 1972 Nodulation of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) under the influence of sodium chloride. Indian J. Agric. Sci.42, 384.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Subba Rao, N. S., Lakshmi Kumari, M., Singh, C. S. and Biswas, A. 1975 Salinity and alkalinity in relation to legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. PartB, 40, 544.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yadav, N. K. and Vyas, S. R. 1971 Effect of salts and pH on the growth of Rhizobium strains. Indian J. Microbiol.11, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yadav, N. K. and Vyas, S. R. 1971 Note on the response of root nodule rhizobia to saline, alkaline and acid conditions. Indian J. Agric. Sci.41, 1123.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zobbell, C. E. and Felthem, C. B. 1934 A comparison of lead and iron as detectors of H2S production by bacteria. J. Bacteriol.28, 169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basak, M.K., Goyal, S.K. Studies on tree legumes. Plant Soil 56, 39–51 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197951

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197951

Key Words

Navigation