Skip to main content
Log in

Phytometric estimation of fertility of waterlogged rich-fen peats usingEpilobium hirsutum L.

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The above-ground net production of herbaceous vegetation in 16 stands of waterlogged rich fen in Broadland, Norfolk UK, has been compared with the growth ofEpilobium hirsutum seedlings (in controlled environment) on replicate peat samples from each site and with the chemical composition of extracts from sub-samples of each peat (Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe, Mn, inorganic P, inorganic N). There were no consistent or significant relationships between measured concentrations of major nutrients (K, N, P) in peat samples and netin situ production of the vegetation or with growth ofE. hirsutum seedlings on each peat. There was a strong, significant (p<0.001) relationship between above ground productionin situ and growth ofE. hirsutum seedlings. Seedling growth thus provided a simple, sensitive phytometric measure of fertility of the waterlogged peats (pH range 6.0–7.0). One possible limitation is the apparent sensitivity ofE. hirsutum seedlings to high manganese concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Al-Farraj M M 1983 The Influence of Environmental Conditions on the Growth of Wet land Plants, with Special Reference toEpilobium hirsutum L. andE. palustre L. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Sheffield.

  2. Black C A 1965 Methods of Soil Analysis Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, No. 9, Part 2. Madison, Wisconsin.

  3. Clements F E and Goldsmith G W 1924 The Phytometer Methods in Ecology. Carnegie Institute, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giller K E 1982 Aspects of the Plant Ecology of a Flood-plain Mire in Broadland, Norfolk. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield.

  5. Grime J P et al. 1981 J. Ecol. 69, 1017–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grime J P and Hunt R 1975 J. Ecol. 63, 393–422.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hemm J D 1970 Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water 2nd Ed. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1473, Washington.

  8. Mason C F and Bryant R J 1975 J. Ecol. 63, 71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pallis M 1911In Types of British Vegetation. Ed. A G Tansley. pp 214–245. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rorison I H J. Ecol. 55, 725–741.

  11. Shamsi S R A and Whitehead F H 1974 J. Ecol. 62, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shamsi S R A and Whitehead F H 1977 J. Ecol. 65, 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sokal R R and Rohlf F J 1981 Biometry: the principles and practise of statistics in biological research. pp 526–532. W H Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stainton M P, Capel M J and Armstrong F A J 1977 The Chemical Analysis of Freshwater 2nd Edition. Canadian Fisheries and Marine Service Special Publication 25. Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, pp 180.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace T 1961 The Diagnosis of Mineral Deficiencies in Plants by Visual Symptoms. pp 78–80. H.M.S.O. London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weaver J E and Clements F E 1938 Plant Ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wheeler B D 1983 J. Ecol. 71, 529–544.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wheeler B D and Giller K E 1982 J. Ecol. 70, 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Farraj, M.M., Giller, K.E. & Wheeler, B.D. Phytometric estimation of fertility of waterlogged rich-fen peats usingEpilobium hirsutum L.. Plant Soil 81, 283–289 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197161

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197161

Key words

Navigation