Abstract
The British National Health Service (BNHS) was founded, to quote Minister of Health Aneurin Bevan, to ‘universalise the best’. Over time, however, financial constraints forced the BNHS to turn to incrementalist budgeting, to rationalise care and to ask its practitioners to act as gatekeepers. Seeking a way to ration scarce tertiary care resources, BNHS gatekeepers began to use chronological age as a rationing criterion. Age-rationing became the ‘done thing’ without explicit policy directives and in a manner largely invisible to patients, to Parliament, and to the public. The invisibility of the practice, however, violates the publicity principle that John Rawls and other philosophers believe essential to fairness. BNHS invisible age-rationing practices are thus a test case of the principle that fairness presupposes publicity; they raise the question: is it possible to preserve equitability in a system that uses non-public criteria to allocate scarce resources? To seek an answer, published data on access to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treatment in Britain and the European Community (EC) are analysed. Among the findings are: that BNHS age-rationing acts as an excuse for denying care to those most likely to need ESRD treatment; and is, moreover, arbitrary and inequitable. It is further argued that no age-rationing policy can sustain visibility, and that, if the BNHS is to be fair to its patients, it must reform its present age-rationing practices, replacing them by a publicly visible, outcome-based rationing policy that rations either in terms of QALYs or triage categories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eckstein, H. (1958).The English Health Service: Its Origins, Structure, and Achievements, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, p. 172.
Klein, R. (1983).The Politics of the National Health Service, Longman Group, London, pp. 62–66.
Lindblom, C. E. (1980). Incrementalism: the science of ‘muddling through’.Public Administration Review 19, 79–88.
Halper, T. (1989).The Misfortunes of Others: End-Stage Renal Disease in the United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Aaron, H. and Schwartz, W. (1984).The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care, The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
Yates, J. (1987).Why Are We Waiting? An Analysis of Hospital Waiting Lists, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Slee, V. and Slee, D. (1991).Health Care Terms, 2nd edn, Tringa Press, Saint Paul, MN.
Callahan, D. (1987).Setting Limits: Medical Goals in An Aging Society, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Daniels, N. (1986). Why saying no to patients in the United States is so hard.New England Journal of Medicine 314, 1380–1383.
Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian constructivism in moral theory: The Dewey lectures 1980.The Journal of Philosophy 77, 515–572.
Fleck, L. (1990). Justice, HMOs, and the invisible rationing of health care resources.Biothics 4, 97–120.
Medical Services Study Group of the Royal College of Physicians (1981). Deaths from chronic renal failure.British Medical Journal 283, 281–282; see also the response, ‘Audit in renal failure: the wrong target? 555–557.
Daniels, N. (1988).Am I My Parents Keeper: An Essay on Justice Between the Young and Old, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Guillemin, J. H. and Holmstrom, L. L. (1986).Mixed Blessings: Intensive Care for Newborns, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Menzel, P. (1990).Strong Medicine: The Ethical Rationing of Health Care. Oxford University Press, New York.
Baker, R. (1992). The inevitability of health care rationing. In,Rationing America's Medical Care: Oregon and Beyond, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., pp. 208–230.
Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press.
Baker, R. and Strosberg, M. (1992). Triage and equality: an historical reassessment of utilitarian analyses of triage.Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2, 103–124.
Brannigan, M. (1993). Oregon's experiment.Health Care Analysis 1, 15–32.
Garland, M. (1992). Rationing in public: Oregon's priority-setting methodology. In,Rationing America's Medical Care: Oregon and Beyond, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., pp. 37–59.
Strosberg, M., Weiner, J. and Baker, R. (1992).Rationing America's Medical Care: Oregon and Beyond, The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
Kaplan, R. (1992). A quality-of-life approach to health resource allocation. In,Rationing America's Medical Care: Oregon and Beyond, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., pp. 60–77.
Morreim, E. H. (1992). The impossibility and necessity of quality of life research.Bioethics 6, 218–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A longer version of this paper was presented atThe Sixth European Conference of Medicine and Health Care, Budapest, Hungary, August 1992.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, R. Visibility and the just allocation of health care: A study of Age-Rationing in the British national Health Service. Health Care Anal 1, 139–150 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197107
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197107