Skip to main content
Log in

On controlling the parameter in the logarithmic barrier term for convex programming problems

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a log-barrier based algorithm for linearly constrained convex differentiable programming problems in nonnegative variables, but where the objective function may not be differentiable at points having a zero coordinate. We use an approximate centering condition as a basis for decreasing the positive parameter of the log-barrier term and show that the total number of iterations to achieve an ε-tolerance optimal solution isO(|log(ε)|)×(number of inner-loop iterations). When applied to then-variable dual geometric programming problem, this bound becomesO(n 2 U/ε), whereU is an upper bound on the maximum magnitude of the iterates generated during the computation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fiacco, A. V., Private Correspondence, 1993.

  2. Rockafellar, R. T.,Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fiacco, A. V., andMcCormick, G. P.,Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Golstein, E. G.,Theory of Convex Programming, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bazaraa, M. S., andShetty, G. M.,Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzaga, C. C.,Path Following Methods for Linear Programming, SIAM Review, Vol. 34, pp. 167–224, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Den Hertog, D.,Interior-Point Approach to Linear, Quadratic, and Convex Programming: Algorithms and Complexity, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University, Delft, Holland, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duffin, R. J., Peterson, E. L., andZener, C.,Geometric Programming: Theory and Applications, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anstreicher, K. Den Hertog, D., Roos, C., andTerlaky, T.,A Long-Step Barrier Method for Convex Quadratic Programming, Report No. 90-53, Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Holland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Monteiro, R. D. C., andAdler, I.,An Extension of Karmarkar-Type Algorithm to a Class of Convex Separable Programming Problems with Global Linear Rate of Convergence, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 15, pp. 408–422, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kortanek, K. O., Potra, F., andYe, Y.,On Some Efficient Interior-Point Methods for Nonlinear Convex Programming, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Vol. 152, pp. 169–189, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, J.,A Path Following Algorithm for a Class of Convex Programming Problems, Zeitschrift für Operations Research: Methods and Models of Operations Research, Vol. 36, pp. 359–377, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Den Hertog, D., Roos, C., andTerlaky, T.,On the Classical Logarithmic Barrier Function Method for a Class of Smooth Convex Programming Problems, Computer Science Report No. 90-28, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Holland, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jarre, F.,The Method of Analytic Centers for Smooth Convex Programs, Dissertation, Institut für Angewandte Mathematik und Statistik, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, West Germany, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nesterov, Y. E., andNemirovsky, A. S.,Self-Concordant Functions and Polynomial Time Methods in Convex Programming, Central Economical and Mathematical Institute, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, USSR, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Den Hertog, D., Roos, C., andTerlaky, T.,On the Monotonicity of the Dual Objective Along Barrier Paths, COAL Bulletin, Vol. 20, pp. 2–7, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kortanek, K. O., andNo, H.,A Second-Order Affine Scaling Algorithm for the Geometric Programming Dual with Logarithmic Barrier, Optimization, Vol. 23, pp. 303–332, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kortanek, K. O., andZhu, J.,A Polynomial Barrier Algorithm for Linearly Constrained Convex Programming Problems, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 18, pp. 116–127, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abrams, R. A.,Projections of Convex Programs with Unattained Infima, SIAM Journal on Control, Vol. 13, pp. 706–718, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Avriel, M., andWilliams, A. C.,On the Primal and Dual Constraint Sets in Geometric Programming, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 3, pp. 684–688, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gochet, W., Kortanek, K. O., andSmeers, Y.,On a Classification Scheme for Geometric Programming and Complementarity Theorems, Applicable Analysis, Vol. 6, pp. 47–59, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bigelow, J. H., DeHaven, J. C., andShapiro, N. Z.,Chemical Equilibrium Problems with Unbounded Constraint Sets, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 18, pp. 768–775, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kortanek, K. O., Rom, W. O., andSoyster, A. L.,Solution Sets of Convex Programs Related to Chemical Equilibrium Problems, Operations Research, Vol. 21, pp. 240–246, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. V. Fiacco

The authors gratefully acknowledge very constructive and insightful comments and suggestions from the two anonymous referees and the correspondence from A. V. Fiacco (Ref. 1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kortanek, K.O., Zhu, J. On controlling the parameter in the logarithmic barrier term for convex programming problems. J Optim Theory Appl 84, 117–143 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191739

Key Words

Navigation