Summary
Relatively large quantities of seed were obtained from the interspecific backcross (A. fistulosum xA. cepa) ×A. cepa allowing, for the first time, an extensive study of the heritable traits exhibited by backcross progeny. Two backcross populations, BC1034 and BC1040, distinguished by differentA. fistulosum parents, were characterized for the isozyme markersIdh-1, Adh-1, andPgi-1. Statistical methods are described to calculate cell probabilities for a mixed population of F2 and BC1 progeny, using an estimate of the fraction of F2 progeny in the population derived from the isozyme data. Cell probability distributions were calculated for a mixed population with independent pairs of loci and a mixed population with nonindependent pairs of loci. The isozyme lociIdh-1 andPgi-1 appear to be linked, with a map distance estimated at 33 centimorgans (cM) in BC1034 and 42 cM in BC1040. The probability distribution model for linked loci did not account for all of the distorted segregation ratios inIdh-1 ×Adh-1 orPgi-1 ×Adh-1. The cytological literature does not support linkage betweenIdh-1 ×Adh-1 orPgi-1 ×Adh-1. The distorted segregation ratios for these pairs of loci are likely the result of genetic incompatibilities between the two species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Emsweller SL, Jones HA (1935a) An interspecific hybrid inAllium. Hilgardia 9:265–273
Emsweller SL, Jones HA (1935b) Meiosis inA. fistulosum, A. cepa, and their F1 hybrid. Hilgardia 9:277–294
Emsweller SL, Jones HA (1945) Further studies on the chiasmata of theA. cepa ×A. fistulosum hybrid and its derivatives. Am J Bot 32:370–379
Graves JAM (1988) Genome instability in interspecific cell hybrids. I. Unstable expression of genes in divergent cell hybrids. J Genet 67:9–22
Hermsen JGTH (1977) General considerations on interspecific hybridization. In: Proc 8th EUCARPIA Congr, Madrid, Spain
Jones HA, Mann LK (1963) Onions and their allies. Interscience, New York p 32
Levan A (1936) Die Zytologie vonA. cepa ×A. fistulosum. Hereditas 21:195–214
Levan A (1941) The cytology of the species hybridA. cepa ×A. fistulosum and its polyploid derivatives. Heredity 27:253–272
Maeda T (1937) Chasma studies inA. fistulosum, A. cepa, and their F1, F2, and backcross hybrids. Jpn J Genet 13:146–159
Meer QP van der, Benekom JL van (1978) Improving the onion crop (A. cepa L.) by transfer of characters fromA. fistulosum L. Biul Warzywniczy 22:87–91
Peffley EB (1986) Evidence for chromosomal differentiation ofAllium fistulosum andA. cepa. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 111:126–129
Peffley EB, Currah I. (1988) The chromosomal locations of enzyme-coding genesAdh-1 andPgi-1 inAllium fistulosum L. Theor Appl Genet 75:945–949
Peffley EB, Mangum P (1990) Introgression ofA. fistulosum L, intoA. cepa L.: cytogenetic evidence. Theor Appl Genet 79:113–118
Peffley EB, Orozco-Castillo C (1987) Polymorphism of isozymes within plant introductions ofAllium cepa L. andA. fistulosum L. HortScience 22(5):956–957
Peffley EB, Corgan JN, Horak KE, Tanksley SD (1985) Electrophoretic analysis ofAllium alien addition lines. Theor Appl Genet 71:176–184
Vallejos CE, Tanksley SD (1983) Segregation of isozyme markers and cold tolerance in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 66:241–247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by H. F. Linskens
Journal Article No. 1578, Agricultural Experiment Station, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cryder, C.M., Corgan, J.N., Urquhart, N.S. et al. Isozyme analysis of progeny derived from (Allium fistulosum ×Allium cepa) ×Allium cepa . Theoret. Appl. Genetics 82, 337–345 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190620
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190620