Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship of service individualization to client functioning in programs for severely mentally Ill persons

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A measure of service individualization, derived from the goals in clients' treatment plans, was developed and used to evaluate this treatment process variable for 141 severely mentally ill persons served by three psychosocial rehabilitation programs. Relatively few of the 364 goals reviewed were highly individualized. Level of service individualization was inversely related to clients' functional skills, residential independence, level of education, and a primary diagnosis of an affective disorder, but positively related to a diagnosis of schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder. The goal individualization measure differentiated both between programs and among staff members, even after controlling for differences on client variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony, W.A., Pierce, R.M., Cohen, M.R., & Cannon, J.R. (1980).The skills of diagnostic planning. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arns, P.G., & Linney, J.A. (1993). Work, self, and life satisfaction for persons with severe and persistent mental disorders.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17 (2), 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, L.L. (1983). Planning services for chronically mentally ill patients.Bulletin of the menninger Clinic, 47, 163–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartko, J.J. & Carpenter, W.T. (1976). On the methods and theory of reliability.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 163, 307–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G.R., Miller, L.D., Krumwied, R.D., & Ward, R.S. (1988). Assertive case management in three CMHCs: A controlled study.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39:411–418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, J.S. (1988). What do we really know about community support programs? Strategies for better monitoring.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39:946–952.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, J.S., & Test, M.A. (1987). An empirical analysis of services delivered in a model community support program.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 10(4), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, J.S., & Test, M.A. (1992). A model for measuring the implementation of community support programs: Results from three sites.Community Mental Health Journal, 28, 227–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan, R.A., Blankertz, L., Messinger, K.W. & Gardner, J.R. (1990). Experts' assessment of psychosocial rehabilitation principles.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13(3), 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. (1990).Standards manual for organizations serving people with disabilities. Tucson, AZ; Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, M.D., Cohen, M.R., & Nemec, P.B. (1988). Psychiatric rehabilitation programs: Putting concepts into practice?Community Mental Health Journal, 24, 7–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, P., & Warner, R. (1992). Case management, quality of life, and satisfaction with services of long0term psychiatric patients.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 799–802.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerrell, J.M. & Hargreaves, W.A. (1991). The operating philosophy of community programs. Berkeley: Institute for Mental Health Services Research, Working Paper #18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncher, F.J., & Prinz, R.J. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies.Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. (1974).Evaluating treatment environments: A social ecological approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheck, R., Neale, M., & Gallup, P. (1993). Community-oriented mental health care: Assessing diversity in clinical practice.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L.C., & Struenig, E.L. (1983). SLOF: A behavioral rating scale for assessing the mentally ill.Social Work Research and Abstracts, 19, 9–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arns, P.G., Linney, J.A. The relationship of service individualization to client functioning in programs for severely mentally Ill persons. Community Ment Health J 31, 127–137 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02188762

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02188762

Keywords

Navigation