Skip to main content
Log in

Faux-boolean algebras, classical probability, and determinism

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

It is possible to define, for any quantum system, an algebra of ‘definite-valued events’—those events that are definitely occurrent or non-occurrent. It is shown that two different sets of constraints on the algebra of definite-valued events are each equivalent to the definition of that set as a certain ‘pseudo-Boolean’ algebra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Accardi (1981), ‘Topics in quantum probability’,Phys. Rep. 77:169–192.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Bacciagaluppi and M. Dickson (1995), ‘Modal Interpretations with Dynamics’, University of Cambridge preprint.

  3. J. Bub (1994), ‘On the structure of quantal proposition systems’,Found. Phys. 24:1261–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bub, J. and Clifton, R. (1995) ‘A Uniqueness Theorem for Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics’, University of Maryland preprint.

  5. J. Butterfield (1992), ‘Bell's theorem: what it takes’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 43:41–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Clifton (1995a), ‘Independently motivating the Kochen-Dieks modal interpretation of quantum mechanics’,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 46:33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Clifton (1995b), ‘Making sense of the Kochen-Dieks “nocollapse” interpretation of quantum mechanics independent of the measurement problem’,Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., forthcoming.

  8. M. Dickson (1995), ‘Faux-Boolean algebras and classical models’, University of Notre Dame preprint.

  9. D. Dieks (1989), ‘Resolution of the measurement problem through decoherence of the quantum state’,Phys. Lett. A 142:439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Dieks (1994), ‘Modal interpretation of quantum mechanics, measurements and macroscopic behavior’,Phys. Rev. A 49:2290–2300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Fine (1982a), ‘Hidden variables, joint probability, and the Bell inequalities’,Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:291–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Fine (1982b), ‘Joint distributions, quantum correlations, and commuting observables’,J. Math. Phys. 23:1306–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Healey (1989)The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Kochen (1985), ‘A new interpretation of quantum mechanics’, in P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds.Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore).

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Pitowsky (1989),Quantum Probability—Quantum Logic (Springer, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Vermaas (1995). ‘Transition probabilities and the modal interpretation’, University of Utrecht preprint.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickson, W.M. Faux-boolean algebras, classical probability, and determinism. Found Phys Lett 8, 231–242 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187347

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187347

Key words

Navigation