Skip to main content
Log in

Productivity and photosynthetic efficiency ofSpirulina platensis as affected by light intensity, algal density and rate of mixing in a flat plate photobioreactor

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of the rate of mixing on productivity of algal mass in relation to photon flux density and algal concentration was quantitatively evaluated in cultures ofSpirulina platensis grown in a newly designed flat-plate photobioreactor. Special emphasis was placed on elucidating the principles underlying efficient utilization of high photon flux density for maximal productivity of algal-mass. Whereas the rate of mixing exerted little influence on productivity and photosynthetic efficiency in cultures of relatively low algal density, its effect became ever more significant as algal concentration was increased. Maximal mixing-enhanced cell concentrations and productivity of biomass were obtained at the highest light intensity used. At each level of incident light intensity, maximum productivity and photosynthetic efficiency could be achieved only when algal concentration and mixing rates were optimized. The higher the intensity of the light source, the higher became the optimal culture density, highest algal concentrations and productivity of biomass being obtained at the highest light intensity used. The rate of mixing required careful optimization: when too low, maximal productivity resulting from the most efficient utilization of light could not be obtained. Too high a rate of mixing resulted in cell damage and reduced output rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burlew JS (1953) Chapter 17. In Burlew JS (ed.), Algae Culture from Laboratory to Pilot Plant. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington DC: 235–272.

  • De la Noüe J, Cloutier-Mantha L, Walsh P, Picard G (1984) Influence of agitation and aeration modes on biomass production byOOcystis sp. grown on wastewaters. Biomass 4: 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson LE, Lee HY (1986) Process analysis and design of algal growth systems. In Barclay W, Mcintosh R (eds), Algal Biomass Technologies. Nova Hedwigia 83: 197–206.

  • Gittelson A, Hu Q, Richmond A (1996) The photic volume in photobioreactors supporting super-high population densities of the photoautotrophSpirulina platensis. J. appl. environ. Microbiol. (in press).

  • Goldman IC (1979) Outdoor algal mass cultures. II. Photosynthetic yield limitations. Water Res. 13: 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobbelaar JU (1989) Do light/dark cycles of medium frequency enhance phytoplankton productivity? J. appl. Phycol. 1: 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobbelaar JU (1994) Turbulence in mass algal cultures and the role of light/dark fluctuations. J. appl. Phycol. 6: 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobbelaar JU (1991) The influence of light/dark cycles in mixed algal cultures on their productivity. Bioresource Technol. 38: 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guterman H, Ben-Yaakov S, Vonshak A (1989) Automatic on-line growth estimation method for outdoor algal biomass production. Biotechnol. Bioengng 34: 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DO, Scurlock JMO (1993) Biomass Production and Data. In Hall DO, Scurlock JMO, Bolhar-Nordenkampf HR, Leegood RC, Long SP (eds) Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment. Chapman & Hall, London: 425–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Q, Guterman H, Richmond A (1996) A flat inclined modular photobioreactor (FIMP) for outdoor mass cultivation of photoautotrophs. Biotechnol. Bioengng (in press).

  • Kok B (1953) Chapter 6. In Burlew JS (ed.), Algal culture: from laboratory to pilot plant. Carnegie Institute Washington Pub. 600: 63–75.

  • Laws EA, Taguchi S, Hirata J, Pang L. (1988) Optimization of microalgal production in a shallow outdoor flume. Biotechnol. Bioengng 32: 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws ER, Terry KL, Wickman J, Challup MS (1983) A simple algal production system designed to utilize the flashing light effect. Biotechnol. Bioengng 25: 2319–2335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee YK, Pirt SJ (1981) Energetics of photosynthetic algal growth: influence of intermittent illumination in short (40 s) cycles. J. gen. Microbiol. 124, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Märkl H (1980) Modelling of algal production systems. In Shelef G, Soeder CJ (eds), Algae Biomass. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical medical Press: 361–383.

  • Marquez FJ, Sasaki K, Nishio N, Nagai S (1995) Inhibitory effect of oxygen accumulation on the growth ofSpirulina platensis. Biotechnology Letters 17: 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JN, Myers J (1954) Growth rate ofChlorella in flashing light. Plant Physiol. 29: 152–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirt SJ, Lee YK, Walach MR, Pirt MW, Balyuzi HHM, Bazin MJ (1983) A tubular bioreactor for photosynthetic production of biomass from carbon dioxide: design and performance. J. chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 33: 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulz O (1994) Open-air and semi-closed cultivation systems for the mass cultivation of microalgae. In Phang SM, Lee YK, Borowitzka MA; Whitton BA (eds), Algal Biotechnology in the Asia-Pacific Region. University of Malaya: 113–117.

  • Richmond A (1988) A prerequisite for industrial microalgaculture: efficient utilization of solar irradiance. In Stadler T, Mollion J, Verdus MC, Karamanos Y, Morvan H, Christiaen D (eds), Algal Biotechnology. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd, Essex: 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond A, Grobbelaar JU (1986) Factors affecting the output rate ofSpirulina Platensis with reference to mass cultivation. Biomass. 10: 253–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond A, Vonshak, A (1978)Spirulina culture in Israel. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol. 11: 274–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stitt M (1986) Limitation of photosynthesis by carbon metabolism. Plant Physiol. 81: 1115–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry KL (1986) Photosynthesis in modulated light: quantitative dependence of photosynthetic enhancement on flashing rate, Biotechnol. Bioengng 28: 988–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torzillo G, Carlozzi P, Pusharaj B, Montani E, Materassi R (1994) A two-plane tubular photobioreactor for outdoor culture ofSpirulina. Biotechnol. Bioengng 42: 891–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torzillo G, Giovannetti L, Bocci F, Materassi R (1984) Effect of oxygen concentration on the protein content ofSpirulina biomass. Biotechnol. Bioengng 26: 1134–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torzillo G, Pushparaj B, Bocci F, Balloni W, Materassi R, Florenzano G (1986) Production ofSpirulina biomass in closed photobioreactors. Biomass 11: 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonshak A, Abeliovich A, Boussiba S, Richmond A (1982) Production ofSpirulina biomass: Effects of environmental factors and population density. Biomass 2: 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman JC, Goebel RP, Benemann JR (1988) Photobioreactor design: mixing, carbon utilization and oxygen accumulation. Biotechnol. Bioengng 31: 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarouk C (1966) Contribution a l'étude d'une cyanophycée. Influence de divers facteurs physiques et chimiques sur la croissance et la photosynthèse deSpirulina maxima. Ph.D. Thesis, Paris.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Author for correspondence

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiang, H., Richmond, A. Productivity and photosynthetic efficiency ofSpirulina platensis as affected by light intensity, algal density and rate of mixing in a flat plate photobioreactor. J Appl Phycol 8, 139–145 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186317

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186317

Key words

Navigation