Abstract
I show that on Richard Healey's interpretation of quantum mechanics, a composite property is possessed if and only if each of its factors is possessed. This result has a number of agreeable consequences, the foremost being that it exempts Healey's interpretation from the Decomposition Problem, a problem afflicting some rival interpretations. At the heart of my argument is a purely mathematical theorem, which I prove, concerning projection operators in tensorproduct Hilbert spaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. d'Espagnat,Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Benjamin, Reading, 1976), Part Four.
B. C. van Fraassen, “Semantic analysis of quantum logic”, in C. A. Hooker, ed.,Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973), p. 80;Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).
S. Kochen, “A new interpretation of quantum mechanics,” in P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds.,Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985) p. 151.
R. Healey,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
D. Dieks,Phys. Lett. A 142, 439 (1989).
J. Bub,Found. Phys. 22, 737 (1992).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
J.S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964).
N. Reeder and R. Clifton,Phys. Lett. A 204, 198 (1995).
F. Arntzenius, “Kochen's interpretation of quantum mechanics,” in A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, eds.,PSA 1990, Volume 1 (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 1990), p. 241.
R. Clifton,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34, 1303 (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reeder, N. Property composition in Healey's interpretation of quantum mechanics. Found Phys Lett 8, 497–522 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186243
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186243