Skip to main content
Log in

Growth response of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) to inoculation withGlomus mosseae, Trichoderma aureoviride andPythium ultimum in a peat-perlite mixture

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interactions between the mycorrhizal fungusGlomus mosseae, the plant pathogenPythium ultimum, and a pathogen-antagonistTrichoderma aureoviride in the rhizosphere ofTagetes erecta (marigold) were studied for their effects on plant growth in a peat-perlite substrate. Mycorrhizal fungus inoculation protected the plant againstP. ultimum, since both phytomass production and foliar development were higher in mycorrhizal plants.T. aureoviride had no effect on nonmycorrhizal plants in the presence or absence ofP. ultimum. However, more biomass was produced by mycorrhizal plants whenT. aureoviride was present, whether or not soil was infested withP. ultimum. ei]R Rodriguez-Kabana

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azcón R, Barea J M and Hayman D S 1976 Utilization of rock phosphate in alkaline soils by plants inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azcón-Aguilar C and Barea J M 1985 Effect of soil microorganisms on formation of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 84, 536–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker R 1989 ImprovedTrichoderma spp. for promoting crop productivity. Trends Biotechnol. 7, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barea J M, Bonis A F and Olivares J 1983 Interactions betweenAzospirillum and VA mycorrhiza and their effect on growth and nutrition of maize and ryegrass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 705–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen G D and Theodorou C T 1979 Interactions between bacteria and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 11, 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvet C, Pera J and Barea J M 1990 Interactions ofTrichoderma spp. withGlomus mosseae and two wilt pathogenic fungi. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 29, 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvet C, Barea J M and Pera J 1992 In vitro interactions between the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungusGlomus mosseae and some saprophytic fungi isolated from organic substrates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 775–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook R J and Baker K F 1983 The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN. 539 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davet P, Artiques M and Martin C 1981 Production en conditions non aseptiques d'inoculum deTrichoderma harzianum Rifai pour des essais de lutte biologique. Agronomie 1, 933–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey C B 1971 Nonpathogenic organisms associated with mycorrhizae.In Mycorrhizae. Ed. X Hacskaylo, USDA Miscellaneous Publication 1189. 255 p.

  • Dennis C and Webster J 1971 Antagonistic properties of species-groups ofTrichoderma. I. Production of non volatile antibiotics. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 57, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeOliveira V L, Bellei M M and Borges A C 1984 Control of white rot of garlic by antagonistic fungi under controlled environmental conditions. Can. J. Microbiol. 30, 884–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeOliveira V L and Garbaye J 1989 Les microorganismes auxiliaires de l'établissement des symbioses mycorrhiziennes. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 17, 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbaye J and Bowen G D 1987 Effect of different microflora on the success of ectomycorrhizal inoculation ofPinus radiata. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 941–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Garrido J M and Ocampo J A 1989 Effect of VA-mycorrhizal infection of tomato on damage caused byPseudomonas syringae. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21, 165–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannetti M and Mosse B 1980 An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infections in roots. New Phytol. 84, 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henis Y, Elad Y, Chet I, Hadar I and Hadar E 1979 Control of soil plant pathogenic fungi in carnation, strawberry and tomato byTrichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology, 69, 1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang S F 1988 Effects of mycorrhizae and metalaxyl on growth of alfalfa seedlings in soils from fields with ‘alfalfa sickness’ in Alberta. Plant Dis, 72, 448–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K R, Balakrishna A N and Bagyaraj D J 1982 Interactions between a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus andStreptomyces cinnamomeous and their effects on finger millet. New Phytol. 92, 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuter G A and Hoitink H A J 1985 Use of combinations of microbial antagonists to suppressRhizoctonia andPythium damping-off in compost-amended media. Phytopathology 75, 1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok O C H, Fahy P C, Hoitink H A J and Kuter G A 1987 Interactions between bacteria andTrichoderma hamatum in suppression ofRhizoctonia damping-off in bark compost media. Phytopathology 77, 1206–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderman R G 1988 Mycorrhizal interactions with the rhizosphere microflora: The mycorrhizosphere effect. Phytopathology 78, 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J R and Linderman R G 1986 Response of subterranean clover to dual inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and a plant growth promoting bacteriurnPseudomonas putida. Soil Biol. Biochem. 18, 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson E B and Hoitink H A J 1983 The role of microorganisms in the suppression ofRhizoctonia solani in container media amended with composted hardwood bark. Phytopathology 73, 274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera J and Calvet C 1989 Suppression ofFusarium wilt or carnation in a composted pine bark and a composted olive pumice. Plant Dis. 73, 699–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin R 1991 Mycorrhizes et protection phytosanitaire.In Les mycorrhizes des arbres et plantes cultivées. Ed. D GStrullu, pp 93–130. Technique et Documentation Lavoisier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips J M and Hayman D S 1970 Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55, 158–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerbell R C 1987 The inhibitory effect ofTrichoderma species and other soil microfungi on formation of mycorrhiza byLaccaria bicolor in vitro. New Phytol, 105, 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia D M and Schenck N C 1983 Germination of chlamydospores of threeGlomus species as affected by soil matric potential and fungal contamination. Mycologia 75, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trillas-Gay M I, Hoitink H A J and Madden L V 1986 Nature of suppression ofFusarium wilt of radish in a container medium amended with composted hardwood bark. Plant Dis. 70, 1023–1027.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calvet, C., Pera, J. & Barea, J.M. Growth response of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) to inoculation withGlomus mosseae, Trichoderma aureoviride andPythium ultimum in a peat-perlite mixture. Plant Soil 148, 1–6 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02185378

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02185378

Key words

Navigation