Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in ion composition and hexitol content of differentPlantago species under the influence of salt stress

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect of salinity on the ionic balance and the hexitol content of the halophyteP. maritima L. and the nonhalophytesP. major L. ssp.major, P. lanceolata L., andP. media L. was studied in a culture experiment. In response to salt application the nonhalophilous species increased their internal electrolyte content to a considerably greater extent at high transpiration thanP. maritima. Excessive uptake of Cl and SO4 following salt-treatment was in most cases compensated by a decline in the total organic anion content in all species under investigation. Na was strongly accumulated in the shoots ofP. maritima when subjected to salt-stress, while the nonhalophytic species tended to exclude this ion from leaf tissue enhancing Mg-uptake for charge balance. Acyclic polyhydric alcohols (sorbitol and mannitol), the dominant soluble carbohydrates in allPlantago species studied, increased, with one exception, in all plants under saline conditions. The results indicate marked physiological differences between the halophyteP. maritima and the nonhalophytic members of the genusPlantago in their reaction to salinity being perhaps partially responsible for differences in the degree of salt tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad I, Larher F and Stewart G R 1979 Sorbitol, a compatible osmotic solute inPlantago maritima. New Phytol. 82, 671–678.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad I, Wainwright S J and Stewart G R 1981 The solute and water relations ofAgrostis stolonifera ecotypes differing in their salt tolerance. New Phytol. 87, 615–629.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albert R 1982 Halophyten.In Pflanzenökologie und Mineralstoffwechsel. Ed. H Kinzel. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein L, Ehlig C F and Clark R A 1969 Effect of grape rootstocks on chloride accumulation in leaves. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 94, 584–590.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blom C W P M 1976 Effects of trampling and soil compaction on the occurence of somePlantago species in coastal sand dunes. I. Soil compaction, soil moisture and seedling emergence. Oecol. Plant. 11, 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein E and Jefferies R L 1964 The genetic basis of selective ion transport in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 15, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erdei L and Kuiper P J C 1979 The effect of salinity on growth, cation content, Na+-uptake and translocation in salt-sensitive and salt-tolerantPlantago species. Physiol. Plant. 47, 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erdei L, Stuiver C E E and Kuiper P J C 1980 The effect of salinity on lipid composition and on activity of Ca2+- and Mg2+-stimulated ATPases in salt-sensitive and salt-tolerantPlantago species. Physiol. Plant. 49, 315–319.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flowers T J 1975 Halophytes.In Ion Transport in Plant Cells and Tissues. Eds. D A Baker and J L Hall. pp. 309–334. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flowers T J, Troke P F and Yeo A R 1977 The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28, 89–121.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freijsen A H J and Van Dijk A 1975 Differences in growth rate and salt tolerance between varieties of the halophyteCentaurium littorale (Turner) Gilmour, and their ecological significance. Acta Bot. Neerl. 24, 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gorham J, Hughes L I and Wyn Jones R G 1981 Low-molecular-weight carbohydrates in some salt-stressed plants. Physiol. Plant. 53, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greenway H and Munns R 1980 Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 149–190.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacoby B 1964 Function of bean roots and stems in sodium retention. Plant Physiol. 39, 445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jefferies R L, Rudmik T and Dillon E M 1979 Responses of halophytes to high salinities and low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 64, 989–994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Königshofer H 1981 Stoffwechselphysiologische Untersuchungen an Plantago-Arten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ökologischer Aspekte. Phil. Diss. Universität Wien.

  17. Lambers H, Blacquière T and Stuiver C E E 1981 Interactions between osmoregulation and the alternative respiratory pathway inPlantago coronopus as affected by salinity. Physiol. Plant. 51, 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Läuchli A 1976 Genotypic variation in transport.In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series, vol. 2, part B. Eds. U Lüttge and M Pitman. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Läuchli A 1976 Symplasmic transport and ion release to the xylem.In Transport and Transfer Processes in Plants. Eds. I F Wardlaw and J B Passioura. Academic Press, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Läuchli A 1979 Regulation des Salztransportes und Salzausschließung in Glykophyten und Halophyten. Ber Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 92, 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oertli J J 1968 Extracellular salt accumulation; a possible mechanism of salt injury in plants. Agrochimica 12, 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Popp M and Kinzel H 1981 Changes in the organic acid content of some cultivated plants induced by mineral ion deficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 32, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ramati A, Liphschitz N and Waisel Y 1979 Osmotic adaptation inPanicum repens. Differences between organ, cellular and subcellular levels. Physiol. Plant. 45, 325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rozema J 1976 An ecophysiological study on the response to salt of four halophytic and glycophyticJuncus species. Flora 165, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rush D W and Epstein E 1976 Genotypic responses to salinity. Differences between salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant genotypes of the tomato. Plant Physiol. 57, 162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sagar J R and Harper J L 1964Plantago major, Plantago lanceolata andPlantago media. J. Ecol. 52, 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 1971 Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato: responses ofLycopersicon esculentum, L. peruvianum andL. esculentum minor to sodium chloride solution. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 22, 631–638.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Königshofer, H. Changes in ion composition and hexitol content of differentPlantago species under the influence of salt stress. Plant Soil 72, 289–296 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181968

Key words

Navigation