Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on uptake of heavy metals by the Scandinavian ‘Kisplanten’Lychnis alpina andSilene dioica

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pot trials onLychnis alpina, L. alpina var. serpentinicola, andSilene dioica were carried out on these ‘kisplanten’ (pyrite plants) to determine their uptake and tolerance of copper, lead, nickel and zinc. The tolerance and uptake of all four heavy metals was far greater for both varieties ofL. alpina than forS. dioica thus casting doubt onS. dioica being a true ‘kisplante’. There were no detectable differences between both varieties ofL. alpina indicating that var. serpentinicola may only be a stunted form ofL. alpina possibly not warranting varietal ranking. Uptake of copper, lead and nickel was very great in the case ofL. alpina. Plant-soil correlations for nickel were very highly significant in the case of both varieties ofL. alpina so that this taxon has an obvious role in biogeochemical prospecting. To describeL. alpina as a ‘copper flower’ is an oversimplification of a complex situation. The species is probably a true pyrite plant with tolerance to all of the major components of sulphide ore deposits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bølviken, B. and Låg, J. 1978 Trans. Inst. Min. Metall.86, B173-B180.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bølviken, B. et al. 1977 J. Geochem. Explor.8, 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, R. R. et al. 1979 Proc. R. Soc. London Ser.B, 203, 387–403.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks, R. R. et al. 1979 J. Geochem. Explor.11, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Godin, E. 1979 Personal Communication to B. Bølviken see ref. 4.

  6. Låg, J. and Bølviken, B. 1974 Nor. Geol. Unders.304, 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Låg, J. et al. 1969 Nor. Geol. Unders.266, 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lounamaa, J. 1956 Ann. Bot. Soc. Zool.-Bot. Fenn. ‘Vanamo’29, 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tanner, V. 1931 Mem. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn.6, 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rune, O. 1953 Acta Phytogeogr. Suec.31, 1–139.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Timperley, M. H. et al. 1970 J. Appl. Ecol.7, 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vogt, T. 1939 K. Nor. Vidensk. Selsk., Forh.12, 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vogt, T. 1942 K. Nor. Vidensk. Selsk., Forh.15, 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vogt, T. 1942 K. Nor. Vidensk. Selsk., Forh.15, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vogt, T. and Braadlie, O. 1942 K. Nor. Vidensk. Selsk., Forh.15, 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vogt, T. et al. 1943 K. Nor. Vidensk. Selsk., Forh.16, 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vogt, T. and Bugge, J. 1943 K. Nor. Vidensk. Selsk., Forh.16, 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, R.R., Crooks, H.M. Studies on uptake of heavy metals by the Scandinavian ‘Kisplanten’Lychnis alpina andSilene dioica . Plant Soil 54, 491–496 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181842

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181842

Key words

Navigation