Skip to main content
Log in

Mercury removal by immobilized algae in batch culture systems

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accumulation and volatilization of mercury by non-immobilized and immobilizedChlorella emersonii have been studied in batch culture systems. Reduction in the mercury concentration in the growth medium by non-immobilized cells was highly dependent on inoculum density, whilst reduction in mercury concentration by immobilized cells was rapid at all inoculum densities. Mercury accumulation by immobilized cell biomass was significantly greater than by non-immobilized cells with 106 and 105 cells bead−1 or ml−1. Volatilization of mercury by non-immobilized cell systems was greatest at higher inoculum densities, whereas more mercury was volatilized from immobilized cell systems at lower inoculum densities, and was greatest with unstocked alginate beads. Thus, in immobilized systems, mercury removal from solution is complex and involves mercury accumulation by the cells and volatilization by the matrix and cells. Further studies of mercury accumulation and volatilization by unstocked immobilization matrices revealed that agarose volatilized much less mercury than alginate or agar. The precise mechanism of mercury volatilization by alginate remains unclear, though it is thought to be a chemical effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksu Z, Kutsal T (1987) The usage ofChlorella vulgaris in waste water treatment containing heavy metal ions. Proc. 4th Eur. Cong. Biotech 2: 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Bassat D, Mayer AM (1977) Reduction of mercury chloride byChlorella: evidence for a reducing factor. Physiol. Pl. 40: 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier P, De La Noüe J (1985) Wastewater nutrient removal with microalgae immobilized in carrageenan. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 7: 621–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnall DW, Green B, Henzl MT, Hosea JM, McPherson RA, Sneddon J, Alexander MD (1986) Selective recovery of gold and other metal ions from algal biomass. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20: 206–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Filippis LF (1978) The effect of sub-lethal concentrations of mercury and zinc onChlorella IV Characteristics of a general reducing enzyme system for metallic ions. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 86S: 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Filippis LF, Pallaghy CK (1976) The effect of sub-lethal concentrations of mercury and zinc onChlorella III Development and possible mechanisms of resistance to metals. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 79S: 332–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Itri FM (1972) The environmental mercury problem. Chemical Rubber Company Press, Cleveland, Ohio, 5–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (1982) Directive on limit values and quality objectives for mercury discharges by the chloralkali electrolysis industry (82/176/EEC). Off. J. Eur. Comm. L81: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (1982) Directive on limit values and quality objectives for mercury discharges by sectors other than the chlor-alkali industry (84/156/EEC). Off. J. Eur. Comm. L74: 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster TJ (1987) The genetics and biochemistry of mercury resistance. CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology 15: 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen S, Jernelöv A (1969) Biological methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms. Nature 223: 753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khummongol D, Canterford GS, Fryer C (1982) Accumulation of heavy metals in unicellular algae. Biotech. Bioeng. 25: 2643–2660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyucak N, Volesky B (1988) Biosorbents for recovery of metals from industrial solutions. Biotech. Lett. 10: 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macka W, Wihlidal H, Stehlik G, Washüttl J, Bancher E (1978) Metabolic studies of Hg 203 onChlamydomonas reinhardi Experientia 15: 602–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima A, Horikoshi T, Sakagushi T (1982) Recovery of uranium by immobilized microorganisms. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 16: 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols HW (1973) Growth media-freshwater. In: Stein JR (ed.). Handbook of Phycological Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pore RS (1984) Detoxification of chlordecone poisoned rats withChlorella andChlorella derived sporopollenin. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 7: 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PK, Goulding KH, Mak AL, Trevan MD (1986) Factors affecting the growth characteristics of alginate-entrappedChlorella. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 8: 729–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PK, Reeve JO, Goulding KH (1989) Phosphorus uptake kinetics of immobilizedChlorella in batch and continuous-flow culture. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 11: 590–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieh YJ, Barber J (1973) Uptake of mercury byChlorella and its effect on potassium regulation. Planta 109: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson SC, Goulding KH, Robinson PK (1989) Mercury accumulation and volatilization in immobilized algal cell systems. Biotech. Lett. 11: 861–864.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkinson, S.C., Goulding, K.H. & Robinson, P.K. Mercury removal by immobilized algae in batch culture systems. J Appl Phycol 2, 223–230 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179779

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02179779

Key words

Navigation