Abstract
A long-term retrospective study was conducted on two groups of patients affected with typical central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). One group was not treated and the other was treated by direct argon laser photocoagulation. CSCR shows a long-term good prognosis of visual acuity. The visual acuity of laser-treated eyes improves significantly (P ≤ 0.05), particularly in single focus cases (P ≤ 0.01). Unfortunately, these results cannot be statistically compared to the natural course of the non-treated patients because of the initial inhomogeneity of the two groups. Laser treatment did not produce any long-term complications. The recurrence rate in treated and untreated eyes was similar.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Binaghi M, Prevost Y, Coscas G (1984) Chorioretinopatie sereuse centrale idiopathique. J Fr Ophtalmol 7:419–436
Brancato R, Mahnic F, Menchini U (1978) In: Cupak K (ed) Photocoagulation. Lasers in ophthalmology. Tiz, Zrinski, Cakovec, pp 76–89 [In Yugoslavian]
Cohen D, Gaudric A, Coscas G, Quentel G, Binaghi M (1983) Epitheliopathie retinienne diffuse et chorioretinopathie sereuse centrale. J Fr Ophtalmol 6:339–349
Gass JDM (1977) Idiopathic central serous choroidopathy (ICSC). Controversy in ophthalmology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 710–714
Gilbert MC, Owens SL, Smith PD, Fine SI (1984) Long-term follow-up of central serous chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 68:815–820
Nanjani M (1977) Long-term follow-up of central serous retinopathy. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 97:656–661
Watzke RC, Burton TC, Woolson RF (1979) Direct and indirect laser photocoagulation of central serous choroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 88:914–918
Zweng HC, Little HL (1977) Argon laser photocoagulation in diffuse retinal pigment epitheliopathy. Mosby, St Louis, pp 117–126
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brancato, R., Scialdone, A., Pece, A. et al. Eight-year follow-up of central serous chorioretinopathy with and without laser treatment. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 225, 166–168 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02175443
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02175443