Skip to main content
Log in

A critique of hierarchy theory

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In our zeal to apply models successfully, failures of the model are often overlooked. A model may be used for quite some time before its success is questioned or before the model fails to be applied successfully. Since hierarchy theory has been deemed successful in the systems field, it is necessary and appropriate to critique the development and application of hierarchy theory using the framework presented inCreative Problem Solving (Flood and Jackson, 1992). That framework proposes a critique that uses the four areas of theory, utility, ideology, and methodology in reviewing a systems theory. It is important to examine hierarchy theory through the analytical filter of critical systems thinking if we are genuinely to understand what hierarchy theory has to offer systems thinking in the exploration of complex situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. F. H. (1985).A Primer on Hierarchy Theory, Unpublished manuscript.

  • Allen, T. F. H., and Starr, T. B. (1982).Hierarchy: Perspective for Ecological Complexity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1979).The Heart of the Enterprise, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1981).The Brain of the Firm, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1985).Diagnosing the System for Organizations, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science.Manage. Sci. 2, 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1961).The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1963). Levels. InThe Myth of Simplicity: Problems of Scientific Philosophy, Prentice-Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1969). The metaphysics, epistemology and methodology of levels. In White, L. L., Wilson, A. G., and Wilson, D. (eds.),Hierarchical Structures, American Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1982).Thought and Wisdom, Intersystems, Seaside, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemson, B. (1984).Cybernetics: A New Management Tool, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1990).Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1993).Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, 2nd ed., Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991).Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1992).Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M. (1967). Biology and the problems of reality.New Scholast.41, 427–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972).Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985). Systems inquiring competence and organizational analysis.Proceedings of the 1985 Meeting of the Society for General Systems Research, pp. 522–530.

  • Jackson, M. C. (1990). Beyond a system of systems methodologies.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 41, 657–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991). The origins and nature of critical systems thinking.Syst. Pract. 4, 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 35, 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G. (1985). Complexity: Some general observations.Syst. Res. 2, 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazlo, E. (1972).The Systems View of the World, Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannermaa, M. (1988). Complexity and systems thinking in futures research: From neutral scenarios to value considerations.Syst. Pract. 1, 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1978).Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1992). Greater than the sum of its parts. 1. Subsystems which possess both matterenergy and information.Behav. Sci. 37, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., and Allen, T. F. H. (1986).An Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. (1973).Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckmeyer, W. J. (1982).The Emerging Systems Paradigm: An Historical Perspective, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, S. N. (1985).Evolving Hierarchical Systems: Their Structure and Representation, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schecter, D. (1991). Interview, May 24.

  • Simon, H. A. (1973). The organization of complex systems. In Pattee, H. H. (ed.),Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troncale, L. R. (1985). Unpublished data from the Integration-Directed Iterative Dialogue, California State University, Pomona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity.Am. Sci. 36, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, G. M. (1975).An Introduction to General Systems Thinking, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P., Buechner, H. K., Coleman, J. S., Forrester, J. W., Lorenz, K., McNeill, D., and Ozbekhan, H. (1971).Hierarchically Organized Systems in Theory and Practice, Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilby, J. A critique of hierarchy theory. Systems Practice 7, 653–670 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173498

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173498

Key words

Navigation