Abstract
The segregation of key traits distinguishing maize and teosinte was analyzed in three F2 and three backcross populations derived from crosses of the modern maize inbred T232 withZea mays ssp.parviglumis. These traits were (i) paired vs. single female spikelets; (ii) two-ranked vs. many-ranked ears; (iii) non-indurated vs. indurated glumes; (iv) inclination of the kernels toward the rachis, and (v) distichous vs. polystichous central staminate spike. All traits showed a simple mode of inheritance except for paired female spikes, which appeared to be controlled by two genes. The loci controlling these major changes were mapped with RFLP markers to four chromosomal regions. These results support the suggestion that maize became differentiated from teosinte with as few as five major gene changes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beadle GW (1972) The mystery of maize. Field Mus Nat Hist Bull 43:9–11
Beadle GW (1980) The ancestry of corn. Scien Amer 242:112–119
Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1991) Genetic interactions among floral genes ofArabidopsis. Development 112:1–20
Burr B, Burr FA (1981) Controlling element events at theShrunken locus in maize. Genetics 98:143–156
Burr B, Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize: theoretical and practical considerations. Trends Genet 7:55–60
Burr B, Burr FA, Thompson KH, Albertson MC, Stuber CW (1988) Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. Genetics 118:519–526
Collins GN (1917) Hybrids of Zea Tunicata and Zea Ramosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci 3:345–349
Collins GN, Kempton JH (1920) A teosinte-maize hybrid. J Agric Res 19:1–37
Doebley J (1990) Molecular systematics ofZea (Gramineae). Maydica 35:143–150
Doebley J (1992) Mapping the genes that made maize. Trends Genet 8:302–307
Doebley J, Stec A (1993) Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics 134:559–570
Doebley J, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1984) Isoenzymatic variation inZea (Gramincae). Syst Bot 9:203–218
Doebley J, Stec A, Wendel J, Edwards M (1990) Genetic and morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F2 population: implications for the origins of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9888–9892
Dorweiler J, Stec A, Kermicle J, Doebley J (1993)Teosinte glume architecture 1: a genetic locus controlling a key step in maize evolution. Science 262:233–235
Emerson RA, Smith HH (1950) Inheritance of number of kernelrows in maize. Cornell Univ Agr Exp Sta Mem No 296:1–30
Galinat WC (1971) The origin of maize. In: Roman H (ed) Annu Rev Genet 5:447–478
Galinat WC (1983) The origin of maize as shown by key morphological traits of its ancestor, teosinte. Maydica 28:121–138
Galinat WC (1985) The missing links between teosinte and maize: a review. Maydica 30:137–160
Galinat WC (1988) The origin of corn. In: Sprague GF (ed) Corn and corn improvement. Agronomical Society of America, Madison, Wis.), pp 1–31
Goodman MM (1988) The history and evolution of maize. Crit Rev Plant Sci 7:197–720
Harlan JR, De Wet JMJ, Price EG (1973) Comparative evolution of cereals. Evolution 27:311–325
Helentjaris T, Slocum M, Wright S, Schaeffer A, Nienhuis J (1986) Construction of genetic linkage maps in maize and tomato using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 72:761–769
Kato YTA (1976) Cytological studies of maize (Zea mays) and teosinte (Zea mexicana) in relation to their origin and evolution. Mass Agric Exp Stn Bull No 635, Amherst, Mass.
Kermicle JL, Allen JO (1990) Cross-incompatibility between maize and teosinte. Maydica 35:399–408
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly M, Lincoln S, Newburg L (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181
Langham DG (1940) The inheritance of intergeneric differences inZea-Euchlaena hybrids. Genetics 25:88–107
Mangelsdorf PC (1947) The origin and evolution of maize. Adv Genet 1:161–207
Mangelsdorf PC, Roberts LM, Rogers JS (1981) The probable origin of annual teosintes. Publication No 10, Bussey Institution of Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass., pp 36–69
McClintock B, Kato YTA, Blumenschein A (1981) Chromosome constitution of races of maize. Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo, Mexico
Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Amer Naturalist 106:283–292
Randolph LF (1976) Contributions of wild relatives of maize to the evolutionary history of domesticated maize: a synthesis of divergent hypothesis. Econ Bot 30:321–345
Rogers JS (1950a) The inheritance of photoperiodic response and tillering in maize-teosinte hybrids. Genetics 35:514–540
Rogers JS (1950b) The inheritance of inflorescence characters in maize-teosinte hybrids. Genetics 35:541–558
Wilkes HG (1967) Teosinte: the closest relative of maize. Bussey Institution of Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by H. Saedler
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Jean Pernes
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Szabó, V.M., Burr, B. Simple inheritance of key traits distinguishing maize and teosinte. Molec. Gen. Genet. 252, 33–41 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173202
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173202