Skip to main content
Log in

System dynamics: Changing perspectives

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anderton, R. H. (1989). The systems study of human action in a real world. In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.),Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlas, Y., and Carpenter, S. (1990). Philosophical roots of model validation: Two paradigms.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 6, 148–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, R. G. (1977).Management System Dynamics, John Wiley & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, R. G. (1985). A system description of counter insurgency warfare.Policy Sci. 18, 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, R. G. (1989). System dynamics—The next ten years. In Flood, R. L., Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.),Systems Prospects: The Next Ten Years of Systems Research, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, R. L. (1989). Simplification and understanding of models.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 5, 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (1992). America's investment famine.Economist 323 (No. 7765), 79–80.

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991).Creative Problem Solving-Total Systems Intervention, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers.Harvard Bus. Rev. 36, 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961).Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, and John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1975). Industrial dynamics—A response to Ansoff and Selvin. In Forrester, J. W. (ed.),Collected Papers of Jay W. Forrester, Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1985). “The” model versus a modeling “process”.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 1, 133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1987a). Lessons from system dynamic modeling.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 3, 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1987b). 14 “obvious truths”.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 3, 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P. (1988). System dynamics: A methodological perspective.Trans. Inst. M. C. 10, 218–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P. (1990). System dynamics as a system-based problem-solving methodology.Syst. Pract. 3, 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra, P. K. J., and Mandal, P. (1991). System dynamics in India.Productivity 32, 286–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mass, N. J. (1986). Methods of conceptualisation.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 2, 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mass, N. J. (1991). Diagnosing surprise model behavior: A tool for evolving behavioral and policy insights.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 7, 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H. (1989). System dynamics meets the press.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 5, 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. W., III (1974).The Limits to Growth—A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Pan Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft, J. D. W. (1985). The feedback view of business and strategy.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 1, 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. P. (1991). What are we publishing? A view from the editor's desk.Syst. Dynam. Rev. 7, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990).The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday/Currency, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (1985). The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model.Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 28(2), 93–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme, E. F. (1983). System dynamics: A system methodology or a system modelling technique.Dynamica 9, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme, E. F. (1990).System Enquiry: A System Dynamics Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme, E. F., and Coyle, R. G. (1983). The development of system dynamics as a methodology for system description and qualitative analysis.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 34, 569–581.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dash, D.P. System dynamics: Changing perspectives. Systems Practice 7, 87–98 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169167

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169167

Keywords

Navigation