Skip to main content
Log in

Impacts of intensive dairy production on smallholder farm women in coastal Kenya

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Welfare impacts of an intensive dairy technology package on women and their families are investigated on 32 smallholder crop-livestock farms in the sub-humid zone off Kilifi District, Coast Province, Kenya. Farms were stratified according to male or female extension contact. A female enumerator interviewed the wife or female head of household on each farm regarding her present and past household responsibilities and the affects of the intensive dairy enterprise on these duties and upon the welfare of the household. On three-quarters of the male contact farms, dairy operators were women. Across all farms, women performed half of all dairy-related activities, but only on female contact farms did income from the dairy enterprise accrue to women in proportion to their labor input. The equitable return of benefits to labor corresponded with better dairy unit performance on female contact farms, where women also indicated greater access to and autonomy over household resources and decision-making. Irrespective of extension contact, there was broad consensus among the women interviewed that intensive dairying has led to improved household welfare, primarily through increased household income and milk consumption. There was also wide agreement, however, that these gains have been achieved at the expense of more work for women. Women on female contact farms were observed spending dairy income on food for the household and childrens' schooling more often than their counterparts on male contact farms. Based on these and other findings, the study concludes that gender of the extension contact, dairy operator and farm owner were determinants of the intra-household impacts of intensive dairying on the smallholder farms in this study. Recommendations for design and delivery of livestock technologies for crop-based farming systems, with special emphasis on how to minimize negative impact on vulnerable household members, are inferred from study findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bekure, S., de Leeuw, P. N., Grandin, B. E., and Neate, J. H. (1991).Maasai Herding: An Analysis of the Livestock Production System of Maasai Pastoralists in Eastern Kajiado District, Kenya. ILCA Systems Study No. 4, International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 154 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavangi, N. A., and Hanssen, A. (1983). Women in Livestock Production with Particular Reference to Dairying.FAO Expert Consultation on Women in Food Production and Marketing, Rome, December 7–14, 1983.

  • Coppock, D. L. (1992). Ethiopian pastoral development.National Geographic Research and Exploration 8(3): 296–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieckmann, N. (1994). The integration of social and gender issues in smallholder dairy production.World Animal Review 79(2): 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittinger, J. P., Chernick, S., Horensein, N., and Saito, K. (1990). Household Food Security and the Role of Women.Report of the Symposium on Household Food Security and the Role of Women, Kadoma, Zimbabwe, January 21–24, 1990.

  • Gladwin, C. H. (1992). Gendered impacts of fertilizer subsidy removal programs in Malawi and Cameroon.Agricultural Economics 7: 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, C. H., and McMillan, D. (1989). Is a turnaround in Africa possible without helping African women to farm?Economic Development and Cultural Change 37(2): 345–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, R., and Salasya, B. (1994). The Gender Factor in Maize Farming and Technology Transfer in Kenya. Paper presented at the Fourth Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Scientific Conference, Nairobi, Kenya, October 24–26, 1994.

  • Huss-Ashmore, R. (1992).Nutritional Impacts of Intensified Dairy Production: An Assessment in Coast Province, Kenya. International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases Technical Report No. 1, ILRAD, Nairobi, 35 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leegwater, P., Ngolo, J., and Hoorweg, J. (1991).Dairy Development and Nutrition in Kilifi District, Kenya. Food and Nutrition Studies Programme Report No. 35/1991, Food and Nutrition Planning Unit, Ministry of Planning and National Development, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, C. (1990). the Role of Women in the Production of Livestock in Third World Countries. Report on the GTZ project: “ThePromotion of Women in the Production of Livestock,” German Technical Assistance Agency, Berlin, Germany, 70 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhebi, A., Mussukuya, E., Perry, B., Thorpe, W., Baya, M., Kruska, R., Rugema, E., and Maloo, S. (1992).Farm Household Economy in Kaloleni Division, Kilifi District, Kenya (in press). International Labouratory for Research on Animal Diseases Occasional Paper Series, ILRAD, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, G. (1992). Dairy production, marketing and consumption in coastal Kenya. InProceedings of the All Africa Conference on Animal Agriculture. Nairobi, Kenya, November 23–27, 1992.

  • Oxby, C. (1983). Women's contribution to animal production and husbandry.World Animal Review September–October: 2–11.

  • Parkin, D. (1991).Sacred Void: Spatial Images of Work and Ritual Among the Giriama of Kenya. The University Press, Cambridge, 259 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, S., and Sanders, J. H. (1992). Technological Change in Agriculture and the Welfare of Sahelian Women: A Case Study in Burkina Faso. Sorghum/Millet Collaborative Research Support Program, Office of Agriculture, Bureau for Science and Technology, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C., 28 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangnekar, S., Vasiani, P., and Rangnekar, D. V. (1994). A study on women in dairy production.World Animal Review 79(2): 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale, M., and Heisey, P. W. (1994). Comment: Gendered impacts of fertilizer subsidy removal programs in Malawi and Cameroon.Agricultural Economics 10(1): 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, H. M. (1984). Women in Agriculture in West Africa—the Research Gaps.Workshop on Women in West Africa, International Livestock Centre for Africa/Ford Foundation, Ibadan, Nigeria, May 7–9, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, A. (1986). Men and women smallholder participants in a stall feeder livestock program in Malawi.Human Organisation 45: 154–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W., Mullins, G., Chabari, F., Maloo, S., Muinga, R., Mukhebi, A., Mureithi, J., Mussukuya, E., Nyambaka, R., ole Maki, M., Otieno, L., Perry, B., Rugema, E., and Wekesa, E. (1991). Smallholder dairy cattle production in coastal Kenya: Resource base assessment and constraint identification. InAnimal Production in Developing Countries. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production, Ashford, Penicuik, Scotland, September 2–4, 1991.

  • von Braun, J., and Webb, P. J. R. (1989). The impact of new crop technology on the agricultural division of labor in a West African setting.Economic Development and Cultural Change April: 513–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters-Bayer, A. (1986). Modernizing milk production in Nigeria: Who benefits?Ceres 113(19): 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, I. (1984). ILCA's Ethiopian highlands programme: Problems and prospectives in expanding participation of women. InWorkshop on Women in Agriculture in West Africa. FF/ILCA. Ibadan, Nigeria, May 7–9, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Formerly International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullins, G., Wahome, L., Tsangari, P. et al. Impacts of intensive dairy production on smallholder farm women in coastal Kenya. Hum Ecol 24, 231–253 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169128

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169128

Key words

Navigation