Skip to main content
Log in

Gender and livestock in African production systems: An introduction

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1970s, the study of gender relations and labor and resource use in different production systems has become an important subject of inquiry. While there has been recent interest in gender and livestock issues in pastoral societies, most of the work on gender and agriculture to date has focused primarily upon the role of women in crop production, to the virtual exclusion of the contributions women, children, and the elderly make to the livestock component of the farming system. The topic of gender (broadly defined to include age and sex criteria) and livestock management was addressed at a session at the 1992 Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association entitled, “Gender and Livestock in African Production Systems,” the contributions to which form the basis of the present volume. Topics presented in the papers include: a conceptual framework for investigation of gender and livestock production and disease control, responsibility for productive tasks, livestock ownership and rights to livestock products, and impacts of and responses to change. Nearly all papers in the volume argue explicitly or implicitly for the need to include gender considerations in the planning of livestock development programs, thereby rendering the collection of interest to both scientits and policymakers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Behnke, R., and Kervin, C. (1983). FSR and the attempt to understand the goals and motivations of farmers.Culture and Agriculture 19: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1970).Women's Role in Economic Development. St Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, M. (1989). Forward. In Feldstein, H. S., and Poats, S. V. (eds.),Working Together. Gender Analysis in Agriculture. Volume 1: Case Studies. Kumarian Press, West Hartford, pp. xiii-xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, G. (1987). Women in pastoral production. Some theoretical notes on roles and resources.Ethnos 52: i-ii, 246–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, P. (1975). Kung women: Contrasts in sexual egalitarianism in the foraging and sedentary contexts. In Reiter, R. (ed.),Toward an Anthropology of Women. Monthly Review Press, New York, pp. 77–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrenberger, E. P. (ed.) (1984).Chayanov, Peasants, and Economic Anthropology. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (1988).Peasant Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensminger, J. (1987). Economic and political differentiation among Galole Orma women.Ethnos 52: i-ii, 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, M., and Leacock, E. B. (1980).Women and Colonization. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, H. S., and Poats, S. V. (eds.) (1989).Working Together. Gender Analysis in Agriculture. Volume 1: Case Studies. Kumarian Press, West Hartford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, H. S., Flora, C. B., and Poats, S. V. (1989). The Gender Variable in Agricultural Research. IDRC Manuscript Report IDRC-MR225e, Women in Development Unit, IDRC, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger, T. (1985).Adding a Food Consumption Perspective to Farming Systems Research. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidl, E. (1975).Women and Men: An Anthropologist's View. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, C. H., and McMillan, D. (1989). Is a turnaround in Africa possible without helping African women farm?Economic Development and Cultural Change 37(2): 345–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, J. I. (1986). Intra-houshold processes and farming systems research: Perspectives from anthropology. In Moock, J. L. (ed.),Understanding Africa's Rural Housholds and Farming Systems. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss-Ashmore, R. (1989). Perspectives on the African food crisis. In Huss-Ashmore, R., and Katz, S. H. (eds.),African Food Systems in Crisis. Part One: Microperspectives. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp. 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokwar, F., and Horowitz, M. M. (eds.) (1991). Gender Relations of Pastoral and Agropastoral Production. A Bibliography with Annotations. Working Paper No. 79, Institute for Development Anthropology, Binghampton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, A. R. C. (1986).Agricultural Development in Southern Africa: Farm Houshold Theory and the Food Crisis. James Currey, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K., and Voorhies, B. (1975).The Female of the Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J. W., Delgado, C. L., and Blackie, M. J. (eds.) (1987).Accelerating Food Production in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Food Policy Research Institute, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minge-Kalman, W. (1977). On the theory and measurement of domestic labor intensity.American Ethnologist 4: 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moock, J. L. (ed.) (1986).Understanding Africa's Rural Households and Farming Systems. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgen, S. (ed.) (1989).Gender and Anthropology. Critical Reviews for Research and Teaching. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. McC. (ed.) (1990).Feminist Research Methods. Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oboler, R. S. (1985).Women, Power, and Economic Change: The Nandi of Kenya. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okali, C. and Sumberg, J. E. (1986). Sheep and goats, men and women: Household relations and small ruminent production in southwest Nigeria. In Moock, J. L. (ed.),Understanding Africa's Rural Households and Farming Systems. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P. (1986). Household management in Botswana: Cattle crops, and wage labor. In Moock, J. L. (ed.),Understanding Africa's Rural Households and Farming Systems. Westview Press, Boulder, Co, pp. 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poats, S. V. (1991).The Role of Gender in Agricultural Development Issues in Agriculture No. 3, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poats, S. V., Schmink, M., and Spring, A. (eds.) (1988).Gender Issues in Farming Systems Research and Extension. Westview Special Studies in Agriculture Science and Policy, Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R. R. (1975).Toward an Anthropology of Women. Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, M. Z., and Lamphere, L. (eds.) (1974).Women, Culture, and Society. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, C. E. (1983).The Invisible Farmers. Women in Agricultural Production. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, K. (1979).Sisters and Wives: The Past and Future of Sexual Equality. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1972).Stone Age Economics. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanday, P. (1981).Female Power and Male Dominance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, T. T. (1978).The Kaya Complex: A History of the Mijikenda Peoples of the Kenya Coast to 1900. Kenya Literature Bureau, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, A. (1986). Men and women smallholder participants in a stall feeder livestock program in Malawi.Human Organization 45: 154–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talle, A. (1987). Women as heads of houses: The organization of production and the role of women among pastoral Maasai of Kenya.Ethnos 52: i-ii, 50–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, N. (1984). Chayanov and economic anthropology. In Durrenberger, E. P. (ed.),Chayanov, Peasants, and Economic Anthropology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorner, D., Kerblay, B., and Smith, R. E. F. (1966).Chayanov on the Theory of Peasant Economy. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, M. J., Grindle, J., Nell, A., and Bachmann, M. (1991). Dairy Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Study of Issues and Options. World Bank Technical Paper No. 135, African Technical Department Series, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters-Bayer, A. (1986). Modernizing milk production in Nigeria: Who benefits?Ceres 113(19): 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, G. (1992). Caught in the crisis: women in the economies of Sub-Saharan Africa. In Kahne, H., and Giele, J. Z. (eds.),Women's Work and Women's Lives. The Continuing Struggle Worldwide. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winrock International (1992).Assessment of Animal Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Winrock International, Morrillton, AK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curry, J. Gender and livestock in African production systems: An introduction. Hum Ecol 24, 149–160 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169124

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169124

Key words

Navigation