Skip to main content
Log in

Of cast net and caste identity: Memetic differentiation between two fishing communities of Karnataka

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two fishing castes, Ambiga and Harikantra, of Karnataka employ different techniques for throwing cast nets in the same habitat. Ambigas throw the net from above the head, as opposed to the far easier Harikantra method of throwing at the waist level. These different techniques are described here as memes, transmitted through learning. A logico- deductive hypothesis is developed here to explain the origin and maintenance of the memetic difference between the castes, with the help of circumstantial semiotic and anthropological evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977).Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béteilles, A. (1965).Caste, Class, and Power. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S. (1993). Ecological Organization of Indian Rural Populations. PhD dissertation, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. (1985).Culture and Evolutionary Process. Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. (1883).Gazettier of Bombay Presidency (Vol. XV, Pt. I). Kanare Government Central Press, Bombay, pp. 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, B. N. (1944).Studies in Indian Social Polity. Purabi Publishers, Calcutta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1990).The Selfish Gene (2nd Ed.). Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and Guha, R. (1992).This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India. Oxford University Press, Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and Iyer, P. (1988). On the diversification of common property resource use by Indian society. In Berkes, F. (ed.),Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community-Based Sustainable Development. Belhaven, London, pp. 240–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and Malhotra, K. C. (1983). Adaptive significance of the Indian caste system: An ecological perspective.Human Ecology 10:465–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISST (1986). Postscript toFisherwomen of Tadri: A Socio-Economic Survey. Institute of Social Studies Trust, Banagalore, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, M. (1980).Caste: The Emergence of the South Asian Social System. Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, R. L., and Nandy, A. (1977).The New Vaishyas. Allied Publishers, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1971). The sacred in human evolution.Annual Review of Ecological Systems 2:23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, E., and Rangachari, K. (1909).Castes and Tribes of Southern India (Vol. 1). Government Press, Madras.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deb, D. Of cast net and caste identity: Memetic differentiation between two fishing communities of Karnataka. Hum Ecol 24, 109–123 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02167963

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02167963

Key words

Navigation